Frequency-dependent fitness in Silene vulgaris, a gynodioecious plant

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 30-36

  Mccauley, David E ^a,b   Brock, Marcus T ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Frequency dependent selection; Gynodioecy; Population structure; Sex ratio

Indexed keywords

FITNESS; FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE; GYNODIOECY; HERMAPHRODITIS,;

DICOTYLEDONEAE; SILENE VULGARIS;

EID: 0031925781     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05135.x     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. ANTOLIN, M. F. 1993. Genetics of biased sex ratios in subdivided populations: models, assumptions, and evidence. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 9:239-282.
2. BARRETT, S. C. H., AND J. R. KOHN. 1991. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. Pp. 3-30.in D. A. Falk and K. E. Holsinger, eds. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
3. CHARLESWORTH, D. 1989. The population biology of gynodioecy in Silene vulgaris (abstr.) Am. J. Bot. 76 (suppl.):74.
4. CHARLESWORTH, D., AND B. CHARLESWORTH. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
5. CHARLESWORTH, D., AND F. R. GANDERS. 1979. The population genetics of gynodioecy with cytoplasmic-genic male-sterility. Heredity 43:213-218.
6. CHARNOV, E. L. 1982. The theory of sex allocation. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
7. CLARKE, B. C. 1979. The evolution of genetic diversity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 205:453-474.
8. COUVET, D., A. ATLAN, E. BELHASSEN, C. GLIDDON, P.-H. GOUYON, AND F. KJELLBERG. 1990. Coevolution between two symbionts: the case of cytoplasmic male sterility in higher plants. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:225-250.
9. FISHER, R.A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
10. FRANK, S. A. 1989. The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. Am. Nat. 133:345-376.
11. _. 1997. Spatial processes in host-parasite genetics. Pp. 325-352 in I. A. Hanski and M. E. Gilpin, eds. Metapopulation biology, ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
12. GOODNIGHT, C. J., J. M. SCHWARTZ, AND L. STEVENS. 1992. Contextual analysis of models of group selection, soft selection, hard selection, and the evolution of altruism. Am. Nat. 140:743-761.
13. GOUYON, P.-H., F. VICHOT, AND J. VAN DAMME. 1991. Nuclear-cytoplasmic male sterility: single point equilibria versus limit cycles. Am. Nat. 137:498-514.
14. GREGORIUS, H.-R., AND M. D. ROSS. 1984. Selection with genecytoplasm interactions. I. Maintenance of cytoplasm polymorphisms. Genetics 107:165-178.
15. HAMILTON, W. D. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477-488.
16. HUSBAND, B. C., AND D. W. SCHEMSKE. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
17. JOLLS, C. L., AND T. C. CHENIER. 1989. Gynodioecy in Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): progeny success, experimental design, and maternal effects. Am. J. Bot. 76:1360-1367.
18. LANDE, R., D. W. SCHEMSKE, AND S. T. SCHULTZ. 1994. High inbreeding depression, selective interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations. Evolution 48:965-978.
19. LEWIS, D. 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphroditic plants. New Phytol. 40:56-63.
20. LLOYD, D. G. 1974. Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity 32:11-31.
21. _. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45:325-339.
22. MAURICE, S., AND T. H. FLEMING. 1995. The effect of pollen limitation on plant reproductive systems and the maintenance of sexual polymorphisms. Oikos 74:55-60.
23. MCCAULEY, D. E., AND D. R. TAYLOR. 1997. Local population structure and sex ratio: evolution in gynodioecious plants. Am. Nat. 150:406-419.
24. PANNELL, J. 1997. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in a metapopulation. Evolution 51:10-20.
25. PETTERSON, M. W. 1992. Advantages of being a specialist female in nodioecious Silene vulgaris S.L. (Caryophyllaceae) Am. J. Bot. 79:1389-1395.
26. SAUMITOU-LAPRADE, P., J. CUGEN, AND P. VERNET. 1994. Cytoplasmic male sterility in plants: molecular evidence and the nucleocytoplasmic conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:431-435.
27. SEAVEY, S. R., AND K. S. BAWA. 1986. Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 52:195-219.
28. UYENOYAMA, M. K., AND M. W. FELDMAN. 1980. Theories of kin and group selection: a population genetics perspective. Theor. Pop. Biol. 17:380-414.
29. WILSON, D. S. 1979. Structured demes and trait-group variation. Am. Nat. 113:606-610.
30. _. 1980. The natural selection of populations and communities. Benjarnin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
31. WILSON, D. S., AND R. K. COLWELL. 1981. Evolution of sex ratios in structured demes. Evolution 35:882-897.