Measuring Participation Across Impairment Groups Using the Craig Handicap Assessment Reporting Technique

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 82, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 936-941

  Walker, Nancy ^a   Mellick, David ^a   Brooks, C A ^a   Whiteneck, Gale G ^a  

^a CRAIG HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability; Handicap; Outcomes Research; Reliability; Surveys; Validity

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DISEASES; HANDICAPPED PERSONS;

SPINAL CORDS; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; BURN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRAIG HANDICAP ASSESSMENT REPORTING TECHNIQUE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STROKE; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 0344420210     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000098041.42394.9A     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. World Health Organization: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1993
2. World Health Organization: International Classification of Impairments, Activities, and Participation: A Manual of Disablement and Functioning. Beta-1 Draft for Field Trials. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1997
3. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, et al: Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73: 519-26
4. Hall KM, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, et al: The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): Metric properties and scoring. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 1998;4:16-30
5. Dijkers M: Scoring CHART: Survey and sensitivity analysis. J Am Parapl Soc 1991;14:85-6
6. Mellick D, Walker N, Brooks CA, et al: Incorporating the domain of cognitive independence into CHART. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas 1999;3:12-21
7. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Including the FIM Instrument). Buffalo, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1996
8. Granger CV, Fiedler RC: The measurement of disability, in Fuhrer MJ (ed): Assessing Medical Rehabilitation Practices: The Promise of Outcomes Research. Baltimore, Paul Brookes, 1997, pp 103-26
9. Smith M, Illig SB, Fielder RC, et al: Intermodal agreement of follow-up telephone functional assessment using the Functional Independence Measure in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:431-5
10. Bland JM, Altman DG: A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 1990;20:337-40
11. Heinemann AW, Whiteneck GG: Relationships among impairment disability handicap and life satisfaction in persons with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1995;10:54-63