Spatial voting in the 2004 presidential election

American Political Science Review

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 59-81

  Jessee, Stephen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651087230     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S000305540909008X     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Achen, ChristopherH. 1992. "Social Psychology, DemographicVariables, and Linear Regression: Breaking the Iron Triangle inVoting Research." Political Behavior 14 (3): 195-211.
2. Adams, James F. 1999. "Multicandidate Spatial Competition with Probabilistic Voting." Public Choice 100: 103-22.
3. Adams, James F. 2001. "ATheory of Spatial Competition with Biased Voters: Party Policies Viewed Temporally and Comparatively." British Journal of Political Science 31: 121-58.
4. Adams, James F., Samuel Merrill III, and Bernard Grofman. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Alvarez,Michael R., and Jonathan Nagler. 1995. "Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election." American Journal of Political Science 39: 714-44.
6. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Jonathan Rodden, and James M. Snyder. 2008. "The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting." American Political Science Review 102: 215-32.
7. Ansolabehere, Stephen, and James M. Snyder. 2000. "Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Elections Models." Public Choice103: 327-36.
8. Bailey, Michael A. 2007. "Comparable Preference Estimates Across Time and Institutions for the Courts, Congress, and Presidency." American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 433-48.
9. Baker, Frank B. 1992. Item Response Theory. New York: Marcel Dekker.
10. Black, Duncan. 1948. "On the Rationale of Group Decision- Making." The Journal of Political Economy 56: 23.
11. Brody, Richard A., and Benjamin I. Page. 1972. "Comment: The Assessment of Policy Voting." American Political Science Review66 (2): 450-8.
12. Campbell, Angus, Warren E. Converse, Phillip E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. "The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
13. Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1980. "The Two Faces of Issue Voting." American Political Science Review 74: 78-91.
14. Carsey, Thomas M., and Geoffrey C. Layman. 2006. "Changing Sides or ChangingMinds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate." American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 464-77.
15. Chapman, David. 1967. "Models of the Working of a Two-Party Electoral System-i." Public Choice 3: 19-37.
16. Chapman, David. 1968. "Models of the Working of a Two-Party Electoral System-ii." Public Choice 5: 19-37.
17. Clinton, Joshua, Simon Jackman, and Douglas Rivers. 2004. "The StatisticalAnalysis ofRollCallData:AUnifiedApproach." American Political Science Review 98: 355-70.
18. Converse, Philip E. 1964. "The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics." In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David E. Aptar. New York: Free Press.
19. Davis, Otto A.,Melvin J.Hinich, and Peter C.Ordeshook. 1970. "An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process." American Political Science Review 64 (2): 426-48.
20. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
21. Enelow, James, and Melvin J. Hinich. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Erikson, Robert S., and David Romero. 1990. "Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of the Voter." American Political Science Review 84: 1103-26.
23. Erikson, Robert S., and Kent Tedin. 2007. American Public Opinion: Its Origin, Content and Impact. 7th ed. New York: Wiley.
24. Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Gerring, John. 1997. "Ideology: A Definitional Analysis." Political Research Quarterly 50: 957-94.
26. Groseclose, Timothy. 2001. "A Model of Candidate Location when one Candidate has a Valence Advantage." American Journal of Political Science 45: 862-86.
27. Heckman, James J., and James M. Snyder. 1997. "Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators." RAND Journal of Economics 28: 142-89.
28. Hinich, Melvin J., and Michael Munger. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. Hotelling, Harold. 1929. "Stability in Competition." The Economic Journal XXXIX: 41-57.
30. Jackman, SimonD. 2004. "BayesianAnalysis for PoliticalResearch. " Annual Reviews of Political Science 7: 483-505.
31. Jessee, Stephen A., and Douglas Rivers. 2008. "Voter Perceptions of Legislator Positions." Working paper.
32. Jost, John T. 2006. "The End of the End of Ideology." American Psychologist 61 (7): 651-70.
33. Knight, Kathleen. 1985. "Ideology in the 1980 Election: Ideological Sophistication does Matter." Journal of Politics 47: 828-53.
34. Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 1997. "Voting Correctly." American Political Science Review 91: 585-98.
35. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1952. The People's Choice. Columbia University Press.
36. Lin, Tse-min, James M. Enelow, and Han Dorussen. 1999. "Equilibrium in Multiparty Probabilistic Spatial Voting." Public Choice 98: 59-82.
37. Lodge, Milton, and Charles S. Taber. 2000. "Three Steps Toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning." In Elements of Reason: Understanding and Expanding the Limits of Rationality 183-213. Cambridge University Press.
38. Luskin,Robert, and John Bullock. 2008. "Don'tKnow' Means 'Don't Know': Dk Responses and the Public's Level of Political Knowledge." Working paper.
39. Malhotra, Neil M., and John A. Krosnick. 2007. The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Nonprobability Samples. Political Analysis15 (3): 286.
40. Markus, Gregory A., and Philip E. Converse. 1979. "A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice." American Political Science Review 73: 1055-70.
41. Miller,Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes. 1963. "Constituency Influence in Congress." American Political Science Review 57(1): 45-56.
42. Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1999. "Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowledge." Political Analysis 8 (1): 57.
43. Mondak, Jeffrey J. 2001. "Developing Valid Knowledge Scales." American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 224-38.
44. Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political- Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Sanders, David, Harold D. Clarke, Marrianne C. Stewart, and Paul Whiteley. 2007. "Does Mode Matter for Modeling Political Choice? Evidence from the 2005 British Election Study." Political Analysis 15 (3): 257.
47. Schofield, Norman. 2002. "Existence of a General Political Equilibrium." Unpublished manuscript.
48. Schofield, Norman, Andrew Martin, Kevin Quinn, and Andrew Whitford. 2004. "Equilibrium in the Spatial 'valence' Model of Politics." Journal of Theoretical Politics 16: 447-81.
49. Sigelman, Lee, and Yung-Mei Tsai. 1981. "Personal Finances and Voting Behavior: A Reanalysis." American Politics Research 9(4): 371.
50. Spiegelhalter, David J. Andrew Thomas, and Nickey G. Best. 1999. WinBUGS Version 1.4. Cambridge: MRC Biostatistics Unit.
51. Stokes, Donald E. 1963. "Spatial Models of Party Competition." American Political Science Review 57: 368-77.
52. Sturgis, Patrick, Nick Allum, and Patten Smith. 2008. "An Experiment on the Measurement of Political Knowledge in Surveys." Public Opinion Quarterly 85(1): 90-102.
53. Tomz,Michael, and Robert P.VanHouweling. 2008. "Positioning and Voter Choice." American Political Science Review 102(2): 303-18.
54. Van Houweling, Robert P., and Paul M. Sniderman. 2007. "The Political Logic of a Downsian Space." Working paper.
55. Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.