The taxonomic impediment overcome: NSF's partnerships for enhancing expertise in taxonomy (PEET) as a model

Systematic Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 428-435

  Rodman, James E ^a   Cody, Jeannine H ^a  

^a NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; EDUCATION; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; TRAINING SUPPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0038487272     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150309326     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. ABRS (Australian Biological Resources Study). 2002. Available at www.ea.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/index.html
2. ASHE, J. S., AND C. CAMPBELL. 2002. Aleocharine staphylinid image database. Available at www.nhm.ukans.edu/ashe/aleo
3. ASKAY, S., AND B. MISHLER. 2002. PEET IV, expanding PEET to the world and to the Tree of Life. Available at http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/bryolab/peetiv/index.shtml
4. BAPTISTA, A. R. P., AND W. N. MATHIS. 2000. Notes on the genus Cyamops Melander (Diptera, Periscelididae) including description of ten new species. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 102:481-506.
5. BIONET. 2002. Global taxonomy initiative, convention on biological diversity. Available at www.unesco.org/mab/cooperation/taxonomy/workshop.htm
6. BLACKMORE, S. 1996. Knowing the earth's biodiversity: Challenges for the infrastructure of systematic biology. Science 274:63-64.
7. BLACKMORE, S. 2002. Biodiversity update - Progress in taxonomy. Science 298:365.
8. CAIRA, J. N., K. JENSEN, AND C. J. HEALY. 1999. On the phylogenetic relationships among tetraphyllidean, lecanicephalidean and diphyllidean tapeworm genera. Syst. Parasitol. 42:77-151.
9. COBICE (Copenhagen Biosystematics Centre). 2003. Access to COBICE, museum research visits. Available at www.zmuc.dk/commonweb/Cobice.htm
10. CONABIO. 2002. Comision Nacional para el Conocimiento y uso de la Biodiversidad. Available at www.conabio.gob.mx
11. CROSBY, M. R., R. E. MAGILL, AND B. H. ALLEN. 2000. A checklist of the mosses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
12. DAHLSTEN, D. 2001. CityBugs: Urban entomology of the San Francisco Bay area. Available at www.cnr.berkeley.edu/citybugs/
13. DUSZYNSKI, D. W. 2001. Coccidia (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) of the mammalian order Chiroptera. Spec. Publ. Mus. Southwest. Biol. Univ. N.M. 5:1-45.
14. FARR, E. R., AND P. T. DEPRIEST. 2000. PEET III, the monographic process. Available at http://persoon.si.edu/peet3/peet3.htm
15. FAUTIN, D., AND R. W. BUDDEMEIER. 2002. Biogeoinformatics of Hexacorallia. Available at www.kgs.ukans.edu/hexacoral/
16. FORTUNER, R. (ed.). 1993. Advances in computer methods for systematic biology: Artifical intelligence, databases, computer vision. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.
17. GERKEN, S., L. WATLING, AND A. KLITGAARD. 2000. Some contumacious Cumacea from Arctic waters. J. Crustacean Biol. 20:31-43.
18. GODFRAY, H. C. J. 2002. Challenges for taxonomy. Nature 417:17-19.
19. HALLING, R. 2001. Biotic surveys and inventories: Support information. Available at www.nybg.org/bsci/surveys/
20. HENDLER, J. 2003. Science and the semantic web. Science 299:520-521.
21. HUGHES, K. W., AND R. H. PETERSEN. 1998. Relationships among Omphalotus species (Paxillaceae) based on restriction sites in the ribosomal ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region. Plant Syst. Evol. 211:231-237.
22. HUHNDORF, S. 2002. Database of Loculoascomycetes specimens and images. Available at www.fmnh.org/research_collections/botany/ botany_sites/imagemanage/intropage.htm
23. INBIO (Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad). 2002. Available at www.inbio.ac.cr/en/default.html
24. ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System). 2002. Available at www.itis.usda.gov/
25. JOHNSON, N. F., AND L. MUSETTI. 1998. The Hymenoptera online database. Available at iris.biosci.ohio-state.edu/hymenoptera/hym_db.html
26. JULIUS, M. L., G. F. ESTABROOK, M. B. EDLUND, AND E. F. STOERMER. 1997. Recognition of taxonomically significant clusters near the species level, using computationally intense methods, with examples from the Stephanodiscus niagarae complex. J. Phycol. 33:1049-1054.
27. KAMPMEIER, G., AND M. E. IRWIN. 2002. MANDALA, a specimenbased database system. Available at pherocera.inhs.uiuc.edu/index.htm
28. KANE, M. D. 2001. The evolutionary biology of ... everything. Syst. Biol. 50:468-469.
29. KLIMOV, P., AND B. M. OCONNOR. 2001. Visual keys to Acari. Available at insects.ummz.lsa.umich.edu/acari/pklimov/vk/index.html
30. KLOPPER, R. R., G. F. SMITH, AND A. C. CHIKUNI. 2002. The global taxonomy initiative in Africa. Taxon 51:159-165.
31. KOENEMANN, S., AND J. R. HOLSINGER. 2000. Revision of the subterranean amphipod genus Spelaeogammarus (Bodidiellidae) from Brazil, including descriptions of three new species and considerations of their phylogeny and biogeography. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 113:104-123.
32. LICHTWARDT, R. W., M. J. CAFARO, AND M. M. WHITE. 2001. The Trichomycetes: Fungal associates of arthropods. Available at www.nhm.ukans.edu/~fungi/monograph/text/mono.htm
33. LUNDSTROM, M. 2003. Moore's law forever? Science 299:210-211.
34. MADDISON, D. R., AND W. P. MADDISON. 2001. The Tree of Life Web project. Available at tolweb.org/tree/phylogeny.html
35. MARSHALL, E. 1989. NSF opens high-speed computer network. Science 243:22-23.
36. MOE, R. (ed.). 2002. Constancea, University of California electronic publications in botany. Available at ucjeps.berkeley.edu/constancea/
37. MOORE, W., AND R. BRUSCA. 2001. A revision of the family Cirolanidae. Available at tolweb.org/tree/eukaryotes/animals/arthropoda/crustacea/isopoda/ accessory/bruscapeet.html
38. NCBI (National Center for Biological Information). 2002. GenBank. Available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/index.html
39. NSB (NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD). 1989. Loss of biological diversity: A global crisis requiring international solutions. Report NSB 89-171. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.
40. NSF (NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION). 1994. Partnerships for enhancing expertise in taxonomy (PEET). Program announcement NSF 94-106. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia.
41. NSF (NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION). 2002. Biodiversity surveys and inventories (BS&I) including support for planetary biodiversity inventories: Mission to an (almost) unknown planet (PBI). Program solicitation NSF 02-186. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia.
42. NSF (NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION). 2003. Revisionary syntheses in systematics (DEB/BIO). Dear Colleague letter, NSF 03-007. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia.
43. PEET (Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy). 2002. Available at web.nhm.ukans.edu/peet/
44. PLATNICK, N. I. 2002. A revision of the Australasian ground spiders of the families Ammoxenidae, Cithaeronidae, Gallieniellidae, and Trochanteriidae (Araneae: Gnaphosoidea). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 271:1-243.
45. PLOTNIKOVA, J. M., T. L. REUBER, F. AUSUBEL, AND D. H. PFISTER. 1998. Powdery mildew pathogenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mycologia 90:1009-1016.
46. SA2000 (SYSTEMATICS AGENDA 2000). 1994. Charting the biosphere: A global initiative to discover, describe and classify the world's species. Technical report. American Society of Plant Taxonomy, Society of Systematic Biologists and the Willi Hennig Society, New York.
47. SCHELTEMA, A. H. 2000. Two new hydrothermal vent species, Helicoradomenia bisquama and Helicoradomenia acredema, from the eastern Pacific Ocean (Mollusca, Aplacophora). Argonauta 14:15-25.
48. SOCIETY OF SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGISTS COUNCIL. 2002. Report of society business for 2002. Syst. Biol. 51:982-990.
49. SOLBRIG, O. T. (ed.). 1991. From genes to ecosystems: A research agenda for biodiversity. Report of IUBS-SCOPE-UNESCO workshop. International Union for Biological Sciences, Paris.
50. SPECIES 2000. 2002. Indexing the world's known species. Available at www.sp2000.org/
51. SPENGLER, S. J. 2000. Bioinformatics in the information age. Science 287:1221-1223.
52. STOTLER, R. E., AND B. J. CRANDALL-STOTLER. 2001. Classification of Bryophyta-Marchantiophyta. Available at bryophytes. plant.siu.edu/marchantiophyta.html
53. SWEDISH TAXONOMY INITIATIVE. 2001. All Swedish species documented in new large-scale project. Available at www.artdata. slu.se/nationalflorafauna.htm
54. TAYLOR, R. W. 1983. Descriptive taxonomy: Past, present, and future. Pages 93-134 in Australian systematic entomology: A bicentenary perspective (E. Highley and R. W. Taylor, eds.). CSIRO, Canberra.
55. ZANDER, R. H., AND K. L. WILSON. 1998. Four proposals to amend the Code, and a report of the special committee on electronic publishing and databasing. Taxon 47:175-177.