Writing with visual images: Examining the video composition processes of high school students

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 426-450

  Bruce, David L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650079713     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. ALVERMANN, D.E. (ED.) (2005). Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York: Peter Lang.
2. ATWELL, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
3. BEACH, R. (2007). Teachingmedialiteracy.com: A web-linked guide to resources and activities. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. BEGLEITER, M. (2001). From word to image: Storyboarding and the filmmaking process. Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.
5. BERNARD, S.C (2004). Documentary storytelling for film and videomakers. Burlington, MA: Focal Press.
6. BRAGG, S. (2002). Wrestling in woolly gloves: Not just being critically media literate. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 30,41-51.
7. BRANDT, D. (2001 ). Literacy in American lives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. BRASS, JJ. (2008). Local knowledge and digital movie composing in an after-school literacy program. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51,464-473.
9. BRITTON, J. (1982). Spectator role and the beginnings of writing. In G. Pradl (Ed.), Prospect and retrospect: Selected essays of James Britton (pp. 46-67). Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
10. BRUCE, D.L. (2008a). Multimedia production as composition. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.) Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (Volume II) (pp. 13-18). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. BRUCE, D.L. (2008b). Visualizing literacy: Building bridges with media. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24,264-282.
12. COCHRAN-SMITH, M., & LYTLE, S.L. (1993). Inside/Outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. DANESI, M. (1994). Messages and meanings: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
14. DIEFENBACH, D.L. (2008). Video production techniques: Theory and practice from concept to screen. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. DYSON, A.H., & WARSHAUER-FREEDMAN, S. (2003). Writing. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J.R. Squire, & J.M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 967-992). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. ELBOW, P. (1995). Being a writer vs. being an academic: A conflict in goals. College Composition and Communication, 46,72-83.
17. EMIG, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
18. EMIG, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28,122-128.
19. FLOWER, L. (1989). Cognition, context, and theory building. College Composition and Communication, 40,282-311.
20. FLOWER, L., & HAYES, J.R. ( 1981 ). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32,365-387.
21. GALLAS, K. (1994). The languages of learning: How children talk, write, dance, draw, and sing their understanding of the world. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. GALLAS, K. (1998). "Sometimes I can be anything": Power, gender, and identity in a primary classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. GALLAS, K. (2003). Imagination and literacy: A teacher's search for the heart of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. GOODMAN, S. (2003). Teaching youth media: A critical guide to literacy, video production, and social change. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. GOODMAN, S. (2005). The practice and principles of teaching critical literacy at the Educational Video Center. In G. Schwarz & P.U. Brown (Eds.) Media literacy: Transforming curriculum and teaching, 104th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 206-228). Malden, MA: Blackwell,
26. GRAHAME, J. (1991). The production process. In D. Lusted (Ed.), The media studies book: A guide for teachers (pp. 146-170). New York: Routledge.
27. GRAVES, D.H. (1975). An examination of the writing processes of seven year old children. Research in the Teaching of English, 9,227-241.
28. GRAVES, D.H. (1994). Afresh look at writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
29. HAWISHER, G. (1989). Research and recommendations for computers and composition. In G. Hawisher & C Selfe (Eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 44-69). New York: Teachers College Press.
30. HAYES, J., & FLOWER, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. HILLOCKS, G., JR. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: NCTE/ERIC.
32. Hillocks, G., JR. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
33. HILLOCKS, G., JR. (2006). Middle and high school composition. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Research on composition: Multiple perspectives on two decades of change (pp. 48-77). New York: Teachers College Press.
34. HOBBS, R. (1998). The seven great debates in the media literacy movement. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 16-32.
35. HOBBS, R. (2007). Reading the media: Media literacy in high school English. New York: Teachers College Press.
36. HOLZWARTH, P., & MAURER, B. (2001). Aesthetic creativity, reflexivity and the play with meaning: A VideoCulture case study. Journal of Educational Media, 26,185-202.
37. HULL, G. & SCHULTZ, K. (2002). Connecting schools with out-of-school worlds: Insights from recent research on literacy in nonschool settings. In G. Hull & K. Shultz (Eds.) Schools out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice (pp. 32-57). New York: Teachers College Press.
38. KAJDER, S.B. (2006). Bringing the outside in: Visual ways to engage reluctant readers. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
39. KENNY, R.F. (2004). Teaching TV production in a digital world: Integrating media literacy, Student workbook (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
40. KENYON, J. (1996). Media literacy and adolescent education: Curriculum goals assessment. UMI Dissertation Services. (UMI No. 9635988).
41. KING, J.R., & O'BRIEN, D.G. (2005). Adolescents' multiliteracies and their teachers' needs to know: Toward a digital détente. In D.E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp.40-50). New York: Peter Lang.
42. KRESS, G.R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
43. KRESS, G.R., & JEWITT, C. (2003). Introduction. In C Jewitt & G.R. Kress (Eds.) Multimodal literacy (pp. 1-18). New York: Peter Lang.
44. LEWIS, J., & JHALLY, S. (1998). The struggle over media literacy. Journal of Communication, 48,109-120.
45. LOBDELL, J. (1997). Hands-on video: A multimedia approach to multiple literacies in the middle school. UMI Dissertation Services. (UMI No. 9803101).
46. LOCKHEED, M. (1985). Some determinants and consequences of sex segregation in the classroom. In L.C Wilkinson & C.B. Marret (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp, 167-184). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
47. MACCOBY, E.E. (1990). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
48. MESSARIS, Paul. (1994). Visual literacy: Images, mind and reality. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
49. MILLER, S.M. (2007). English teacher learning for new times: Digital video composing as multimodal literacy practice. English Education, 40,61-83.
50. MILLER, S.M. (2008). Teacher learning for new times: Repurposing new multimodal literacies and digital-video composing for schools. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.) Handbook of research in teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (Volume II) (pp. 441-453). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. MILLER, S.M., & BOROWICZ, S. (2005). City voices, city visions: Digital video as literacy/ learning supertool in urban classrooms. In L. Johnson, M.E. Finn, & R. Lewis (Eds.). Urban education with an attitude (pp. 87-105). New York: State University of New York Press.
52. NEW LONDON GROUP. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66,60-92.
53. OHIO, D. (2002). Five essential steps in digital video: A DV moviemaker's tricks of the trade. Indianapolis, IN: Que Publications.
54. PERL, S. (1979). The composing processes of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13,317-336.
55. POWERS, J. (2007). "Designing" in the 21st century English classroom: Processes and influences in creating multimodal video narratives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, OH.
56. RANKER, J. (2008). Making meaning on the screen: Digital video production about the Dominican Republic. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51,410-422.
57. REILLY, B. (1998). New media and new literacies: Understanding the culture of a high school video production classroom. UMI Dissertation Services. (UMI No. 9902212).
58. ROBIN, B. (2008). The effective uses of digital storytelling as a teaching and learning tool. In J. Flood, S.B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.) Handbook of research in teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (Volume II) (pp. 429-440). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. ROMANO, T. (2000). Blending genre, altering style: Writing multigenre papers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
60. ROSE, M. (1989). Lives on the boundary: A moving account of the struggles and achievements of America's educational underclass. New York: Penguin Books.
61. SCHOLES, R. (1998). The rise and fall of English: Reconstructing English as a discipline. New Haven: Yale University Press.
62. SCHOONMAKER, M. (2007). Cameras in the classroom: Educating the post-TV generation. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
63. SMAGORINSKY, P. (2002). Teaching English through principled practice. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
64. SOMMERS, N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31,378-388.
65. STAFFORD, R. (1995). Nonlinear editing and visual literacy. London: BFI Publishing.
66. STROUGH, J., BERG, CA., & MEEGAN, S.P. (2001). Friendship and gender differences in task and social interpretations of peer collaborative problem solving. Social Development, 10,1-22.
67. TYNER, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68. UTZ, P. (2006). Today's video (4th ed.). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
69. VACC, N. (1986). Effects of an advanced word processing program on students' editing a research report. Middle School Journal, 17, 25-27.
70. WARE, P. (2006). From sharing time to showtime! Valuing diverse venues for storytelling in technology-rich classrooms. Language Arts, 84,45-54.
71. WOLFE, E.W., BOLTON, S., FELTOVICH, B., & BANGERT, A. ( 1996). A study of word processing experience and its effects on student essay writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14,269-283.
72. ZETTL, H. (2006). Television production handbook (9th Ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.