A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior

Dose-Response

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 113-183

  Leonard, Bobby E ^a  

^a International Academy   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649903062     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15593258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.07-027.Leonard     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Attix, F.H, 1986, Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y, USA.
2. Azzam, S.M, DeToledo, G.P, Raaphorst, G.P. and Mitchell, R.E,1996, Low-dose ionizing radiation decreases the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a low level below the spontaneous rate in C3H 10T1/2 Cells. Radiation Research, 146, 369-373.
3. BEIR VII. 2006. Health effects from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Research Council of the National Academy of Science. National Academies Press. Washington, D.C.
4. Belyaev, I.Y, Czene, S. and Harms-Ringdahl, M. 2001. Changes in chromatin conformation during radiation-induced apoptosis in human lymphocytes. Radiation Research 156, 355-364.
5. Bond, V.P, Varma, M.N, Sondhaus, C.A. and Feinendegen, L.E. 1985. An alternative to absorbed dose, quality and RBE at low exposures. Radiation Research, 104, S-52-S-57.
6. Booz, J. 1978. Symposium. Microdosimetry. Commission of the European Communities. EUE Report No. 5848.
7. Brenner, D.J. and Elliston, C.R. 2001. The potential impact of bystander effects on radiation risks in a Mars mission. Radiation Research, 156, 612-617.
8. Brenner, D.J, Little, J.B. and Sachs, R.K. 2001, The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis. II. A quantitative model. Radiation Research, 155, 402-408.
9. Brenner, D.J. and Sachs, R.K. 2002. Do low dose-rate bystander effects influence domestic radon risks? International Journal of Radiation Biology. 78, 593-604.
10. Brenner, D.J, Sawant, S.G, Hande, M.P, Miller, R.C, Elliston, C.D, FU, Z, Randers-Pherson, G, and Matino, S.A. 2002. Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 78, 1065-1067.
11. Brenner, D.J, Hei, T.K. and Niwa, O. 2007. Low-dose risk assessment: We still have much to learn. Radiation Research, 167, 7.
12. Brenner, D.J. and Hall, E.J. 2007. Computed Tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure. New England Journal of Medicine. 357, 2277-2284.
13. Brooks, A.L, Newton, G.J, Shyr, I.J, Seiler, F.A.and Scott, B.R. 1990. The combined effects of α-particle and x-rays on cell killing and micronuclei induction in lung epithelial cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 58, 799-811.
14. Brooks, A.L, Khan, M.A, Duncan, A, Buschizom, R.L, Jostes, R.F. and Cross, F.T. 1994. Effectiveness of radon relative to acute 60Co γ-rays for induction of micronuclei in vitro and in vivo. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 66, 801-808.
15. Broome, E.J, Brown, D.L. and Mitchel, R.E.J. 2002. Dose responses for adaption to lowdoses of 60Co γ rays and 3H β particles in normal human fibroblasts. Radiation Research, 158, 181-186.
16. Curtis, S.B. 1986. Lethal and potentially lethal lesions induced by radiation-A unified repair model. Radiation Research. 106, 252-270.
17. Cohen, B.L. 1997. Lung cancer rate vs. mean radon level in U.S. counties of various chraracteristics. Health Physics Journal. 72, 114-119.
18. Day, T.K, Zeng, G, Hooker, A.M, Bhat, M, Scott, B.R, Turner, D.R. and Sykes, P.J. 2006. Extremely low priming doses of X radiation induce an adaptive response for chromosome inversions in pKZ1 mouse prostrate. Radiation Research, 166, 757-766.
19. Day, T.K. Zeng, G, Hooker, A.M, Bhat, M, Scott, B.R, Turner, D.R. and Sykes, P.J. 2007. Adaptive response for chromosome inversions in pKZ1 mouse prostrate induced by low doses of X radiation delivered after a high dose. Radiation Research, 167, 682-692.
20. Elmore, E, Lao, X-Y, Ko, M, Rightnar, S. and Redpath, J.L. 2005. Neoplastic transformation in vitro induced by low doses of 232 MeV protons. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 81, 291-297.
21. Elmore, E, Lao, X.Y, Kapadia, R. and Redpath, J.L. 2006. The effect of dose rate on radiationinduced neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiation Research. 166, 832-838.
22. Ellett, W.H. and Braby, L.A, 1972, The microdosimetry of 250 kVp and 65 kVp × rays, Co60 gamma rays and tritium beta particles, Radiation Research 51, 229-243.
23. Enns, E.G. and Ehler, P.F. 1993. Notes on random chords in convex bodies. Journal of Applied Probability. 30, 889-897.
24. Feinendegen, L.E. 2003. Relative implications of protective responses versus damage induction at low dose and low dose-rate exposures, using microdose approach. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 104, 337-346.
25. Feinendegen, L.E. 2005. Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis. British Journal of Radiology. 75, 3-7.
26. Feinendegen, L.E, Bond, V.P. and Sondhaus, C.A, 2000, The dual response to low-dose irradiation: induction vs. prevention of DNA damage p. 3-17. In: Biological effects of low dose radiation. T. Yamada et al, Editors. Elsevier Sciences B.V. Amsterdam.
27. Feinendegen, L.E, Neumann, R.D , Bond, V.P. and Sondhaus, C.A, 2002, Absorbed dose and the quantification of physical events at low-dose irradiation in tissue. Military Medicine. 167, Supl. I, 36-38.
28. Feinendegen, L.E. and Neumann, R.D. 2006. Physics must join with biology in better assessing risk from low-dose irradiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 117, 346-356.
29. Feinendegen, L.E, Polycove, M. and Neumann, R.D. 2007. Whole body responses to low-level radiation exposure: New concepts in mammalian radiobiology. Experimental Hemotology. 35, 37-46.
30. Goodhead, D.T. 2006. Energy deposition stochastics and track structure: what about the target? Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 122, 3-15.
31. Hall, E.J, 2000, Radiobiology for the Radiologist, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York.
32. Hemdal, B, Herrnsdorf, L, Andersson, I, Bengtsson, G, Heddson, B. and Olsson, M. 2005. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra Microdose Mammography unit. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 114, 436-443.
33. Heyes, G.J. and Mill, A.J. 2004. The neoplastic transformation potential of mammograpgy X rays and atomic bomb spectrum radiation. Radiation Research. 162, 120-127.
34. Heyes, G.J, Mill, A.J. and Charles, M.W. 2006. Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme. British Lournal of Radiology. 79, 195-200.
35. Hoel, D.G. and Li, P. 1998. Threshold models in radiation carcinogrnesis. Health Physics Journal. 75,241-250.
36. Hooker, A.M, Bhat, M, Day, T.K, Lane, J.M, Swinburne, S.J, Morley, A.A. and Sykes, P.J. 2004. The linear no-threshold model does not hold for low-dose ionizing radiation. Radiation Research. 162, 447-452.
37. Huang, L, Kim, P.M, Nickoloff, J.A. and Morgan, W.F. 2007. Targeted and nontargeted effects of low-dose ionizing radiation on delayed genomic instability in human cells. Cancer Research 67, 1099-1104.
38. IAEA, International Atomoc Energy Agency, 2001, Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment, Technical Series No. 405. Vienna, Austria.
39. ICRP, 2006. Low dose extrapolation of radiation related cancer risk. Publication 99. International Commission on Radiation Protection. London, United Kingdom.
40. ICRU, 1983. Microdosimetry. ICRU Report 36, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland.
41. Iyer, R. and Lehnert, B.E. 2002. Alpha-particle-induced increases in the radioresistance of normal human bystander cells. Radiation Research. 157, 3-7.
42. Kellerer, A.M, 1984, Chord-length distributions and related quantities for spheroids, Radiation Research, 98, 425-437.
43. Kellerer, A.M. 2002. Electron spectra and the RBE of X rays. Radiation Research 158, 13-22.
44. Kellerer, A.M. 2003. Error bands for the linear-quadratic dose-effect relation. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 42, 77-85.
45. Kellerer, A.M. and Rossi, H.H, 1972. The theory of dual radiation action. In: Current Topics in Radiation Research Quarterly, Editors M. Ebert and A. Howard, Index Medicus, North-Holland Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8:85-158.
46. Ko, S.J, Liao, X-Y, Molloi, S, Elmore, E. and Redpath, J.L. 2004. Neoplastic transformation in vitro after exposure to low doses of mammographic-energy X rays: Qualitative and mechanistic aspects. Radiation Research, 162, 646-654.
47. Koana, T, Okada, M.O, Ogura, K, Tsujimura, H. and Sakai, K. 2007, Redudtion of background mutations by low-dose X irradiation of Drosophila spermatocytes at a low dose rate. Radiation Research, 167, 217-221.
48. Lee, R. Nasonova, E. and Ritter S. 2005. Chromosomse aberrations yields and apoptosis in human lymphocytes irradiated with Fe-ions of differing LET. Advances in Space Research. 35, 268-275.
49. Leonard, B.E, 2000, Repair of multiple break chromosomal damage - its impact on the use of the linear-quadratic model for low dose and dose rates. In: The Effects of Low and Very Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation on Human Health, University of Versailles, Elsevier Science B.V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 449-462.
50. Leonard, B.E, 2005, Adaptive response by single cell radiation hits - Implications for nuclear workers, Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 116, 387-391.
51. Leonard, B.E, 2007a, Adaptive response and human risks: Part I - A microdosimetry dose dependent model, International Journal of Radiation Biology. 83, 115-131.
52. Leonard, B.E, 2007b, Adaptive response: Part II-Modeling for dose rate and time influences, International Journal of Radiation Biology, 83, 395-409.
53. Leonard, B.E, 2007c, Thresholds and transitions for activation of cellular radioprotective mechanisms - correlations between HRS/IRR and the "inverse" dose-rate effect. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 83, 479-489.
54. Little, M.P. 2004. The bystander effect model of Brenner and Sachs fitted to lung cancer data in 11 cohorts of underground miners, and equivalence of fit oa a linear relative risk model with adjustment for attained age and age at exposure. Journal of Radiological Protection. 24, 243-255.
55. Little, M.P. and Wakeford, R, 2001, The bystander effect in C3H 10T1/2 cells and radon induced lung cancer. Radiation Research, 156, 695-699.
56. Miller, R.C, Randers-Pehrson, G, Geard, C.R, Hall, E.J. and Brenner, D.J, 1999, The oncogenic transforming potential of the passage of single á particles through mammalian cell nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 96, 19-22.
57. Mitchel, R.E.J. 2004. The bystander effect: Recent developments and implications for understanding the dose response. Nonlinearity in Biology, Toxiciology, and Medicine. 2, 173-183.
58. Mitchel, R.E.J, Jackson, J.S. and Carlisle. 2004. Upper dose threshold for radiation-induced adaptive response against cancer in high-dose exposed, cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice. Radiation Research, 162, 20-30.
59. Morgan, W.F. 2003a. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiationinduced genomic instability and bystander effects In Vitro. Radiation Research. 159, 567-580.
60. Morgan, W.F. 2003b. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I. Radiationinduced genomic instability and bystander effects In Vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiation Research. 159, 581-596.
61. Morgan, W.F. 2006. Will radiation-induced bystander effects or adaptive responses impact on the shape of the dose response relationships at low doses of ionizing radiation? Dose-Response. 4, 257-262.
62. Mothersill, C. and Seymour, C.B. 1997. Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 71, 421-427.
63. Mothersill, C. and Seymour, C. 2005. Radiation-induced bystander effects: are they good, bad or both? Medicine, Conflict and Survival. 21, 101-110.
64. Mourad, W.G. 2005. Average glandular dose in FDA-approved FFDM systems. U. S. Food and Drug Administration Bulletin. Department of Health and Human Services.
65. Nagasawa, H. And Little, J.B. 1999. Unexpected sensitivity to the induction of mutations by very low doses of alpha-particle radiation: Evidence of a bystander effect. Radiation Research. 152, 552-557.
66. Papworth, D.G. 1975. 5. Appendix. Curve fitting by maximum likelihood. In: Savage, R.K, Editor. Radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in tradescantia. Radiation Botany, 15. 127-140.
67. Pierce, D.A. and Preston, D.L. 2000. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiation Research. 154, 178-186.
68. Pohl-Ruling, J, Fischer, P, Haas, O, Obe, G, Natarajan, A.T, Van Buul, P.P.W, Buckton, K.E, Bianchi, N.O, Larramendy, M, Kucherova, M, Polikova, Z, Leonard, A, Fabry, L, Palitti, F, Sharma, T, Binder, W, Mukherjee, R.N, and Mikherjee, U, 1983, Effect of low-dose acute xirradiation on the frequencies of chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes in vitro. Mutation Research, 110, 71-82.
69. Pohl-Ruling, 1988, Chromosome aberrations in man in areas with elevated natural radioactivity. In: Bezelius Symposium XV, 103-111.
70. Pohl-Ruling, J. and Fischer, P, 1979, The dose-effect relationship of chromosome aberrations to α and γ irradiation in a population subjected to an increased burden of natural radioactivity, Radiation Research 80, 61-81.
71. Pohl-Ruling, J. and Pohl, 1990. Method for á-irradiation of blood cultures with short-lived radon-222 decay products, Mutat. Res. 234: 43-45.
72. Polycove, M. and Feinendegen, L.E. 2003. Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: possible effect of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage. Human & Experimental Toxiciology. 22, 290-306.
73. Portess, D.J, Bauer, G, Hill, M.A. and O'Neill. 2007. Low-dose irradiation of nontransformed cells stimulates the selective removal of precancerous cells via intercellular induction of apoptosis. 2007. Cancer Research, 67, 1246-1253.
74. Preston, D.L, Ron, E, Tokuoka, S, Funamoto, S, Nishi, N, Soda, M, Mabuchi, K. and Kodama, K. 2007. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiation Research. 168, 1-64.
75. Randers-Pehrson, G, Geard, C.R, Johnson, G, Elliston, C.D. and Brenner, D.J. 2001. The Columbia University single-ion microbeam. Radiation Research. 156, 210-214.
76. Randers-Pehrson, G. 2002. Microbeams, microdosimetry and specific dose. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 99, 471-472.
77. Redpath, J.L. 2007. Health risks of low photon energy imaging. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 122, 528-533.
78. Redpath, J.L. and Antoniono, R.J, 1998, Induction of an adaptive response against spontaneous neoplastic transformation in vitro by low-dose gamma radiation. Radiation Research, 149, 517-520.
79. Redpath, J.L, Liang, D, Taylor, T.H, Christie, C. and Elmore, B, 2001, The shape of the doseresponse curve for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro, evidence for an adaptive response against neoplastic transformation at low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiation Research, 156, 700-707.
80. Redpath, J.L, Lu, Q, Lao, X, Molloi, S. and Elmore, E. 2003, Low doses of diagnostic energy X-rays protect against neoplastic transformation in vitro. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 79, 235-240.
81. Redpath, J.L. and Mitchel, R.E.J. 2006. Letter to Editor: Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme. British Journal of Radiology. 79, 854-855.
82. Redpath, J.L. and Elmore, E. 2007. Radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro, hormesis and risk assessment. Dose-Response Journal, 5, 123-130.
83. Rossi, H.H. 1999. Risks from less than 1.o millisievert. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 83, 277-279.
84. Sawant, S.G, Randers-Pehrson, G, Metting, N.F. and Hall, E.J, 2001, Adaptive response and bystander effect induced by radiation in C3 10T1/2 cells in culture. Radiation Research, 156, 177-180.
85. Schollnberger H, Mitchel REJ, Redpath JL, Crawford-Brown DJ and Hofmann W. 2007. Detrimental and protective bystander effects: A model approach. Radiation Research. 168, 614-626.
86. Schollberger H and Eckl PM, 2007. Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model. Dose-Response, 5, 187-203.
87. Scott, B.R. 2005. Stochastic thresholds: A novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects. Dose Response, 3, 547-567.
88. Shadley, J.K. and Wiencke, J.K. 1989. Induction of the adaptive response by X-rays is dependent on radiation intensity. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 56, 107-118.
89. Shadley, J.H. and Wolff, S. , 1987, Very low doses of x-rays can cause human lymphocytes to become less susceptible to ionizing radiation, Mutagenesis 2, 95-96.
90. Shadley, J.D, Afzal, V, and Wolff, S, 1987, Characterization of the adaptive response to ionizing radiation induced by low doses of x rays to human lymphocytes. Radiation Research, 111, 511-517. (Pubitemid 17144564)
91. Shao, C, Folkard, M, Michael, B.D. and Prise, K.M. 2004. Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces bystander responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 101, 13495-13500.
92. Thames, H.D. 1985. An (incomplete-repair) model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 47, 319-339.
93. Tubiana, M, Aurengo, A, Averbeck, D, Bonnin, a>, Le Guen, B, Masse, R, Monier, R, Valleron, A.J. and de Vathaire, F. 2005. Dose-effect relationships and the estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation. Joint Report no. 2, Academie National de Medicine, Institute de France - Academie des Sciences. Paris, France.
94. Tubiana, M, Aurengo, A, Averbeck, D. and Masse, R. 2006. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses. Journal of Radiation Protection. 26, 317-324.
95. Tubiana, M, Aurengo, A, Averbeck, D. and Masse, R. 2007. Low-dose risk assessment: Comments on the summary of the international workshop. Radiation Research, 167, 742-744.
96. USDOC. 1970. Handbook of mathematical functions. U. S. Department of Commerce. Edited By Milton Abramowitz and Irene Stegum. Supertendent of Documents, Washington, D. C.
97. Wang, B, Ohyama, H, Shang, Y, Kazuko, F, Tanaka, K, Nakajima, T, Aizawa, S, Yukawa, O. and Hayata, I. 2003. Adaptive response in embryogenesis: IV. Protective and detrimental bystander effects induced by X radiation in cultured limb bud cells of fetal mice. Radiation Research, 161, 9-16.
98. Ward, J.F. 1985. Biochemistry of DNA lesions. Radiation Research, 104, S-103-S-111.
99. Ward, J.F. 1988. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: Identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology, 35, 95-124.
100. Ward, J.F. 1995. Commentary - Radiation mutagenesis: The initial DNA lesions responsible. Radiation Research, 142, 362-368.
101. Wiencke, J.K, Afzal, V, Oliveri, G, and Wolff, S, 1986, Evidence That [3H] Thymidine-induced adaptive response of human lymphocytes to subsequent doses of x-ray involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Mutagenesis 1, 375-380.
102. Wolff, S, Wiencke, J.K, Afzal, V, Youngbloom,J. and Cortes, I. 1989. The adaptive response of human lymphocytes to very low doses of ionizing radiation: a case of induced chromosomal repair with induction of specific proteins. In: Low Dose Radiation: Biological Bases of Risk Assessment. K.I. Baverstock and J.W. Stather, Eds. 446-454. Taylor and Francis, London.
103. Zhou, H. Randers-Pehrson, G, Geard, C.R, Brenner, D.J, Hall, E.J and Hei, T, 2003. Interaction between radiation-induced adaptive response and bystander mutagenesis in mammalian cells. Radiation Research, 160, 512-516.