pGenTHREADER and pDomTHREADER: New methods for improved protein fold recognition and superfamily discrimination

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 1761-1767

  Lobley, Anna ^a   Sadowski, Michael I ^b   Jones, David T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEARNING ALGORITHM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SOFTWARE;

EID: 67649887151     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp302     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abagyan,R.A. and Batalov,S. (1997) Do aligned sequences share the same fold? J. Mol. Biol., 273, 355-368.
2. Altschul,S.F. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403-410.
3. Altschul,S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402.
4. Bashton,M. and Chothia,C. (2003) The generation of new protein functions by the combination of domains. Structure, 15, 85-89.
5. Baris,E. et al. (2007) UniRef: Comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters Bioinformatics, 23, 1282-1288
6. Chandonia,J.M. et al. (2004) The ASTRAL compendium in 2004. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D189-D192.
7. Cheng,H. et al. (2008) Discrimination between distant homologs and structural analogs: Lessons from manually constructed, reliable data sets. J. Mol. Biol., 377, 1265-1278.
8. Grishin,N.V (2001) Fold change in evolution of protein structures. J. Struct. Biol., 134, 167-185.
9. Harrison,A. et al. (2002) Quantifying the similarities wtihin fold space. J. Mol. Biol., 323, 909-926.
10. Heygi,H. and Gerstein,M. (2001) Annotation transfer for genomics: measuring functional divergence in multi-domain proteins. Genome Res. 11, 1632-1640.
11. Jaroszewski,L. et al. (2002) In search for more accurate alignments in the twilight zone. Protein Sci., 11, 1702-13.
12. Jones,D.T. (1999a) GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol., 287 797-815.
13. Jones,D.T. (1999b) Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol., 292, 195-202.
14. Jones,D.T. (2001) Predicting novel protein folds by using FRAGFOLD. Proteins Struct. Func. Bioinf., 45, 127-132.
15. Jones,D.T. and Swindells, M.B. (2002) Getting the most from PSI-BLAST. Trends Biochem. Sci., 3, 161-164.
16. Madera,M. and Gough,J. (2002) A comparison of profile hidden Markov model procedures for remote homology detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 4321-4328.
17. Madera,M. (2006) PRC - The Profile Compararer. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.
18. McGuffin,L.J. and Jones,D.T. (2003) Improvement of the GenTHREADER method for genomic fold recognition. Bioinformatics, 19, 874-881.
19. McGuffin,L.J. et al. (2006) High throughput profile-profile based fold recognition for the entire Human proteome. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 288.
20. Mittelman,D. et al. (2003) Porbabilistic scoring measures for profile-profile comparison yield more accuracte short seed alignments. Bioinformatics, 19, 1531-1539.
21. Moult,J. et al. (2007) Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction-Round VII. Proteins, 69 (Suppl. 8), 3-9.
22. Muller,A. et al. (1999) Benchmarking PSI-BLAST in genome annotation. J. Mol. Biol., 293, 1257-1271.
23. Orengo,C.A and Thornton,J.M. (2005) Protein families and their evolution: A structural perspective. Ann. Rev. Biochem., 74, 867-900.
24. Panchenko. (2003) Finding weak similarities between proteins by sequence profile comparison. Nucleic Acids Res, 31, 683-689.
25. Platt,J.C. (1999) Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In Platt,J.C. (ed.) Advances in Large Margin Classifiers. MIT press, pp. 61-71.
26. Read,R.J. and Chavali,G. (2007) Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template-based modeling category. Proteins, 69 (Suppl. 8), 27-37.
27. Redfern,O. et al. (2008) Exploring the structure and function paradigm. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 18, 394-402.
28. Reeves,G.A. et al. (2006) Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH Database. J. Mol. Biol. 360, 725-741.
29. Reid,A.J. et al. (2007). Methods of remote homology detection can be combined to increase coverage by 10% in the midnight zone. Bioinformatics, 23, 2353-2360.
30. Rohl,C.A. et al. (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Meth. Enzymol., 383, 66-93.
31. Rychlewski,L. et al. (2000) Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci., 9, 232-241.
32. Rychlewski,L. and Fischer,D. (2005) LiveBench-8: The large-scale, continuous assessment of automated protein structure prediction Protein. Sci., 14, 240-245
33. Sadowski,M.I. and Jones,D.T. (2007) Benchmarking template selection and model quality assessment for high-resolution comparative modeling. Proteins, 69, 476-485.
34. Sali,A. and Blundell,T.L. (1993) Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol., 234, 779-815
35. Schwede,T. et al. (2003) SWISS-MODEL: An automated protein homology-modeling server Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3381-3385
36. Sheskin,D.A. (1998) Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics. 3rd ed. Addision Wesley Professional, Boston.
37. Siew,N. et al. (2000). MaxSub: An automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 16, 776-785.
38. Soding,J. (2005) Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics, 21, 951-960
39. Suzek,B.E. et al. (2007) UniRef: Comprehensive and non-redundant UniPort reference clusters. Bioinformatics, 23, 1282-1288
40. Swanson,R. et al. (2009) Information theory provides a comprehensive framework for the evaluation of protein structure predictions. Proteins, 74, 701-711.
41. Yona,G. and Levitt,M. (2002) Within the twilight zone: A sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J. Mol. Biol., 315, 1257-1275
42. 5: Improving protein fold recognition by using torsion angle profiles and profile-based gap penalty model. PLoS ONE, 3, e2325.
43. Zhang,Y. and Skolnick,J. (2004) Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins, 57 702-710.
44. Zhang,Y. (2007) Template-based modeling and free modeling by I-TASSER in CASP7. Proteins, S8, 108-117.
45. Zhou,H. et al. (2007) Analysis of TASSER-based CASP7 protein structure prediction results. Proteins, S8, 90-97