Patterns of collaboration in design courses: Team dynamics affect technology appropriation, artifact creation, and course performance

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 486-495

  Maldonado, Heidy ^a   Lee, Brian ^a   Klemmer, Scott R ^a   Pea, Roy D ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE TASKS; COLLABORATIVE TOOLS; COURSE PERFORMANCE; CRITICAL STEPS; DATA COLLECTION; DESIGN COURSE; DESIGN NOTEBOOK; GROUP DYNAMICS;

DYNAMICS; STUDENTS; SURVEYS;

CURRICULA;

EID: 67649645680     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Augustine, N. (Chair) (2005) Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
2. Aron, A., E. N. Aron, D. Smollan. (1992). Inclusion of other in the selfscale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63, 596-612.
3. Bailenson, J.N. & Yee, N. (2006). A Longitudinal Study of Task Performance, Head Movements, Subjective Reports, Simulator Sickness, and Transformed Social Interaction in Collaborative Virtual Environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(6).
4. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
5. Barron, B. (2004). Learning Ecologies for Technological Fluency: Gender and Experience Differences. Journal Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 1-36.
6. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., Duguid, P. (1989) Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. EducationalResearcher. 18 (1), pp. 32-42.
7. Chen, H.L., Cannon, D.M., Gabrio, J., & Leifer, L. (2005, June). Using Wikis and Weblogs to Support Reflective Learning in an Introductory Engineering Design Course. Paper presented at the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon.
8. Colbeck, C.L., Campbell, S.E. and Bjorklund, S.A. (2000). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 60-83.
9. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives.
10. Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., and Leifer, L., (2005) "Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, January 2005, pp. 103-120.
11. Evans, D.L., McNeill, B.W., and Beakley, G.C., (1990) "Design in Engineering Education: Past Views of Future Directions," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 79, No. 4, pp. 517-522.
12. Gillies, R.M. (2004) The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 197-213.
13. Goldman, S., Pea, R. D., Maldonado, H. (2004). Emerging Social Engineering in the Wireless Classroom. In Y. Kafai, W. Saldoval, N. Enyedy, A.S. Nixon, & F. Herrera (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2004), 222-230. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
14. Hinds, P., & Mortensen, M. (2005) Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams: The Moderating Effects of Shared Identity, Shared Context, and Spontaneous Communication. Organization Science, 16(3), pp. 290-307.
15. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26-35.
16. Kelley, T., (2001), The Art of Innovation: Currency. 320 pp.
17. Kelley, T., (2005) The Ten Faces of Innovation: Currency. 288 pp.
18. Klemmer, S., Verplank, B., Ju, W. (2005) "Teaching embodied interaction design practice." In DUX 2005: ACM Conference on Designing for User eXperience, San Francisco, CA, November 2005.
19. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation: Cambridge University Press. 138 pp.
20. Leontiev, A.N. (1981). Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
21. Levesque, L. L., Wilson, J. M., & Wholey, D. R. (2001). Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Special Shared Cognition, 22, pp. 135-144.
22. Mabogunje, A., (2003), "Towards a Conceptual Framework for Predicting Engineering Design Team Performance Based on Question Asking Activity Simulation," in Human Behavior in Design, Lindemann, U. (editor), pp. 154-163, Springer-Verlag, London.
23. Maldonado, H., Lee, B., Klemmer, S. 2006. Technology for Design Education: A Case Study. Work in Progress. In Extended Abstracts of the 2006 Association for Computing Machinery's Conference on Human Computer Interaction (CHI 2006), 1067-1072. New York, NY: ACM Press.
24. Mercier, E.M., & Barron, B. (2003, August) Bunnyworld: Experience within a collaborative programming project in a college computer science class. Presented at the European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI 2003) in Padova, Italy.
25. Mercier, E., Goldman, S. & Booker, A. (2006) Collaborating to Learn, Learning to Collaborate: Finding the balance in a cross-disciplinary design course. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), 467-473. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
26. O'Donnell, A. M. (1999). Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. pp. 179-196. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
27. Pea, R. D. (1992). Augmenting the discourse of learning with computer-based learning environments. In E. de Corte, M. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem-solving (pp. 313-344). New York: Springer-Verlag.
28. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.). Distributed cognitions. pp. 47-87. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Sabelli, N. H., & Pea, R. (2004). Six Years Of Knowledge Networking In Learning Sciences AndTechnologies. CILT Final Report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
30. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society. pp. 67-98. Chicago: Open Court.
31. Scribner, S. (1986). Thinking in action: Some characteristics of practical thought In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. pp. 13-30. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Song, S., and Agogino, A.M., (2004) "Insights on designers' sketching activities in new product design teams," Proceedings, 2004 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Salt Lake City, Utah. pp. 351-360.
33. Verplank, B. and S. Kim. (1986) Graphic invention for user interfaces: an experimental course in user interface design, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, vol. 18(3): pp. 50-66.
34. Yang, M., (2003) "Concept Generation and Sketching: Correlations with Design Outcome," Proceedings, 2003 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Chicago, Ill.
35. Yeh, R. B., Liao, C., Klemmer, S. R., Guimbretière, F., Lee, B., Kakaradov, B., Stamberger, J., and Paepcke, A. (2006) ButterflyNet: A Mobile Capture and Access System for Field Biology Research. CHI 2006: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 571-80.