In-silico wear prediction for knee replacements-methodology and corroboration

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1469-1474

  Strickland, M A ^a   Taylor, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational; Corroboration; Experimental; Knee; Mechanics; TKR; Validation; Wear

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL; CORROBORATION; EXPERIMENTAL; KNEE; TKR; VALIDATION; WEAR;

MECHANICS; TESTING;

JOINT PROSTHESES;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; IN VIVO WEAR; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHEAR STRESS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 67649499840     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.022     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Archard J.F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 24 8 (1953) 981-988
2. Arsene, C., et al., 2008. Comparison of two methods for probabilistic finite element analysis of total knee replacement. In: Eighth International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Porto, Portugal.
3. Barnett P.I., et al. Comparison of wear in a total knee replacement under different kinematic conditions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 12 10-12 (2001) 1039-1042
4. Bruns J., Volkmer M., and Luessenhop S. Pressure distribution at the knee joint. influence of varus and valgus deviation without and with ligament dissection. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 113 1 (1993) 12-19
5. Bruns J., Volkmer M., and Luessenhop S. Pressure distribution in the knee joint. influence of flexion with and without ligament dissection. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 113 4 (1994) 204-209
6. Cottrell J.M., et al. Stair ascent kinematics affect UHMWPE wear and damage in total knee replacements. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 78 1 (2006) 15-19
7. DeHeer, D.C., Hillberry, B.M., 1992. The Effect of Thickness and Nonlinear Material Behavior on Contact Stresses in Polyethylene Tibial Components. In: 38th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Reserch Society, Orthopaedic Research Society, p. 327.
8. Ernsberger, C., Whitaker, D., Chavarria, J., 2007. UHMWPE Wear Rate As A Function Of Contact Area And Stress. In: Transactions of the 53rd Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, San Diego, CA.
9. Essner A., et al. The effect of sagittal conformity on knee wear. Wear 255 7-12 (2003) 1085-1092
10. Fisher J., et al. (i) Wear of polyethylene in artificial knee joints. Curr. Orthop. 15 6 (2001) 399-405
11. Fregly B.J., Bei Y., and Sylvester M.E. Experimental evaluation of an elastic foundation model to predict contact pressures in knee replacements. J. Biomech. 36 11 (2003) 1659-1668
12. Galvin, A.L., et al., 2008. A Low Conforming, Low Wear Solution in Fixed Bearing Total Knee Prostheses. In: Transactions of the 54rd Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA.
13. Godest A.C., et al. Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. J. Biomech. 35 2 (2002) 267-275
14. Haider, H., et al., 2008a. Concern with adhesion and wear of a Titanium Niobium Nitride coating on Total Knee Replacements for metal sensitive patients, In: Transactions of the 54rd Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA.
15. Haider, H., Croson, R.E., Garvin, K.L., 2008b. Is wear truly lower and is it the main benefit of rotating platform mobile bearing total knees? In: Transactions of the 54rd Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA.
16. Halloran J.P., et al. Comparison of deformable and elastic foundation finite element simulations for predicting knee replacement mechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 127 5 (2005) 813-818
17. Hamilton M.A., et al. Quantifying multidirectional sliding motions in total knee replacements. transactions of the ASME. J. Biomech. 127 2 (2005) 280-286
18. ISO 14243-1:2002 Implants for surgery. Wear of total knee joint prostheses. Loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with load control and corresponding environmental conditions for test. 2002, The International Organization for Standardization.
19. Jennings L.M., et al. The influence of femoral condylar lift-off on the wear of artificial knee joints. Proc. IMechE Part H: J. Eng. Med. 221 (2007) 305-314
20. Kang L., et al. Quantification of the effect of cross-shear on the wear of conventional and highly cross-linked UHMWPE. J. Biomech. 41 2 (2008) 340-346
21. Kang, L., et al., 2008b. Enhanced Computational Prediction of UHMWPE Wear by Incorporating Cross-shear and Contact Pressure into Archard Theory. In: Transactions of the 54rd Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA.
22. Knight L.A., et al. Comparison of long-term numerical and experimental total knee replacement wear during simulated gait loading. J. Biomech. 40 7 (2007) 1550-1558
23. Knight, L.A., et al., 2005. Influence of cross shear on the wear of polyethylene: a finite element study. In: 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. Orthopaedic Research Society,Washington D.C., USA.
24. Knight, L.A., et al., 2006. Influence of cross shear on the wear of TKA under various kinematic conditions. In: 52nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. Orthopaedic Research Society,Chicago, USA.
25. Knight, L.A., Taylor, M., 2007. The effect of eccentric loading on the wear of total knee arthroplasty, In: Transactions of the 53rd Annual Meeting. Orthopaedic Research Society, San Diego, CA.
26. Maxian T.A., et al. 3-Dimensional sliding/contact computational simulation of total hip wear. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 333 (1996) 41-50
27. Mazzucco D., and Spector M. Effects of contact area and stress on the volumetric wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. Wear 254 5-6 (2003) 514-522
28. McEwen H.M.J., et al. Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 12 10-12 (2001) 1049-1052
29. McEwen H.M., et al. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J. Biomech. 38 2 (2005) 357-365
30. Muratoglu O.K., et al. Simulated normal gait wear testing of a highly cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert. J. Arthroplasty 22 3 (2007) 435-444
31. Pal S., et al. Probabilistic computational modeling of total knee replacement wear. Wear 264 7-8 (2007) 701-707
32. Schwenke T., et al. Slip velocity direction impacts wear in total knee arthroplasty. J. ASTM Int. 3 7 (2006)
33. Strickland, M.A., Browne, M., Taylor, M., 2007. The Effect of Ligament Variability on TKR Performance-a Probabilistic Study. In: Transactions of the 53rd Annual Meeting. Orthopaedic Research Society, San Diego, CA.
34. Turell M., Wang A., and Bellare A. Quantification of the effect of cross-path motion on the wear rate of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Wear 255 7-12 (2003) 1034-1039
35. Wang A. A unified theory of wear for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in multi-directional sliding. Wear 248 1-2 (2001) 38-47
36. Williams, P.A., Tsukamoto, R., Clarke, I.C., 2008. Wear Debris from Sequentially Crosslinked and Crosslinked PE in a Knee Simulator Model, In: Transactions of the 54rd Annual Meeting. Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA.
37. Willing, R.T., Kim, I.Y., 2008. Validation of a Computational UHMWPE Damage Model for TKR Experiment Simulation. In: Transactions of the 54th Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, CA.