Probabilistic computational modeling of total knee replacement wear

Wear

Volumn 264, Issue 7-8, 2008, Pages 701-707

  Pal, Saikat ^a   Haider, Hani ^b   Laz, Peter J ^a   Knight, Lucy A ^c   Rullkoetter, Paul J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computational wear simulation; Kinematics; Knee mechanics; Probabilistic; TKR

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FRICTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; WEAR RESISTANCE;

COMPUTATIONAL WEAR SIMULATION; KNEE MECHANICS;

POLYETHYLENES;

COMPUTATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FRICTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; POLYETHYLENES; WEAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 38749134570     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Schmalzried T.P., and Callaghan J.J. Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 81 (1999) 115-136
2. Ashraf T., Newman J.H., Desai V.V., Beard D., and Nevelos J.E. Polyethylene wear in a non-congruous unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval analysis. Knee 11 (2004) 177-181
3. Rawlinson J.J., Furman B.D., Li S., Wright T.M., and Bartel D.L. Retrieval, experimental, and computational assessment of the performance of total knee replacements. J. Orthop. Res. 24 (2006) 1384-1394
4. McEwen H.M., Barnett P.I., Bell C.J., Farrar R., Auger D.D., Stone M.H., and Fisher J. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J. Biomech. 38 (2005) 357-365
5. Haider H., Alberts L.R., Laurent M.P., Johnson T.S., Yao J., Gilbertson L.N., Walker P.S., Neff J.R., and Garvin K.L. Comparison between force-controlled and displacement-controlled in vitro wear testing on a widely used TKR implant. Trans. ORS 48 (2002) 1007
6. Muratoglu O.K., Bragdon C.R., Jasty M., O'Connor D.O., Von Knoch R.S., and Harris W.H. Knee-simulator testing of conventional and cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts. J. Arthroplasty 19 (2004) 887-897
7. Schwenke T., Borgstede L.L., Schneider E., Andriacchi T.P., and Wimmer M.A. The influence of slip velocity on wear of total knee arthroplasty. Wear 259 (2005) 926-932
8. Kawanabe K., Clarke I.C., Tamura J., Akagi M., Good V.D., Williams P.A., and Yamamoto K. Effects of A-P translation and rotation on the wear of UHMWPE in a total knee joint simulator. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 54 (2001) 400-406
9. Mazzucco D., and Spector M. Effects of contact area and stress on the volumetric wear of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. Wear 254 (2003) 514-522
10. Haider H., Walker P.S., DesJardins J.D., and Blunn G.W. Effects of patient and surgical alignment variables on kinematics in TKR simulation under force-control. J. ASTM Int. 3 (2006)
11. Maxian T.A., Brown T.D., Pedersen D.R., and Callaghan J.J. A sliding-distance-coupled finite element formulation for polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. J. Biomech. 29 (1996) 687-692
12. Maxian T.A., Brown T.D., Pedersen D.R., and Callaghan J.J. Adaptive finite element modeling of long-term polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 14 (1996) 668-675
13. Archard J.F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J. Appl. Phys. 24 (1953) 981-988
14. Teoh S.H., Chan W.H., and Thampuran R. An elasto-plastic finite element model for polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. J. Biomech. 35 (2002) 323-330
15. Bevill S.L., Bevill G.R., Penmetsa J.R., Petrella A.J., and Rullkoetter P.J. Finite element simulation of early creep and wear in total hip arthroplasty. J. Biomech. 38 (2005) 2365-2374
16. Fregly B.J., Sawyer W.G., Harman M.K., and Banks S.A. Computational wear prediction of a total knee replacement from in vivo kinematics. J. Biomech. 38 (2005) 305-314
17. Knight L.A., Pal S., Coleman J.C., Bronson F., Haider H., Levine D.L., Taylor M., and Rullkoetter P.J. Comparison of long-term numerical and experimental total knee replacement wear during simulated gait loading. J. Biomech. 40 (2007) 1550-1558
18. Godest A.C., Beaugonin M., Haug E., Taylor M., and Gregson P.J. Simulation of a knee joint replacement during a gait cycle using explicit finite element analysis. J. Biomech. 35 (2002) 267-275
19. Halloran J.P., Petrella A.J., and Rullkoetter P.J. Explicit finite element modeling of total knee replacement mechanics. J. Biomech. 38 (2005) 323-331
20. Laz P.J., Pal S., Halloran J.P., Petrella A.J., and Rullkoetter P.J. Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics. J. Biomech. 39 (2006) 2303-2310
21. Laz P.J., Pal S., Fields A., Petrella A.J., and Rullkoetter P.J. Effects of knee simulator loading and alignment variability on predicted implant mechanics: a probabilistic study. J. Orthop. Res. 24 (2006) 2212-2221
22. Walker P.S., Blunn G.W., Perry J.P., Bell C.J., Sathasivam S., Andriacchi T.P., Paul J.P., Haider H., and Campbell P.A. Methodology for long-term wear testing of total knee replacements. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (2000) 290-301
23. Haider H., and Walker P.S. Analysis and recommendations for the optimum spring configurations for the soft tissue restraint in force-control knee simulator testing. Trans. ORS 48 (2002) 912
24. ISO Standard 14243-2, Wear of total knee-joint prostheses. Part 2. Methods of measurement, International Standards Organization, 2000.
25. Muccini R., Baleani M., and Viceconti M. Selection of the best element type in the finite element analysis of hip prostheses. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 24 (2000) 145-148
26. Halloran J.P., Easley S.K., Petrella A.J., and Rullkoetter P.J. Comparison of deformable and elastic foundation finite element simulations for predicting knee replacement mechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 127 (2005) 813-818
27. McGloughlin T.M., Murphy D.M., and Kavanagh A.G. A machine for the preliminary investigation of design features influencing the wear behaviour of knee prostheses. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H] 218 (2004) 51-62
28. Wu Y.T., Millwater H.R., and Cruse T.A. Advanced probabilistic structural-analysis method for implicit performance functions. AIAA J. 28 (1990) 1663-1669
29. Haldar A., and Mahadevan S. Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design (2000), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY
30. Catani F., Fantozzi S., Ensini A., Leardini A., Moschella D., and Giannini S. Influence of tibial component posterior slope on in vivo knee kinematics in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J. Orthop. Res. 24 (2006) 581-587
31. Mahaluxmivala J., Bankes M.J., Nicolai P., Aldam C.H., and Allen P.W. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. J. Arthroplasty 16 (2001) 635-640