Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, and their relation with leadership styles

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 657-661

  Nicol, Adelheid A M ^a  

^a ROYAL MILITARY COLLEGE OF CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Consideration; Leadership; Persuasiveness; Production Emphasis; Representation; Right Wing Authoritarianism; Social Dominance Orientation; Tolerance of Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649464182     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adorno T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D.J., and Sanford R.N. The authoritarian personality (1950), Harper, New York
2. Altemeyer B. Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism (1988), Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, CA
3. Altemeyer B. The other "Authoritarian Personality". In: Zanna M.P. (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 30 (1998), Academic Press, San Diego, CA
4. Bass B.M. Leadership and performance beyond expectations (1985), Free Press, New York
5. Burke C.S., Stagl K.C., Klein C., Goodwin G.F., Salas E., and Halpin S.M. What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2006) 288-307
6. De Cremer D., Cornelis I., and Van Hiel A. To whom does voice in groups matter? Effects of voice on affect and procedural fairness judgments as a function of Social Dominance Orientation. The Journal of Social Psychology 148 (2008) 61-76
7. Duckitt J. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (2006) 684-696
8. Duckitt J., Wagner C., du Plessis I., and Birum I. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice. Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (2002) 75-93
9. Duriez B., and Van Hiel A. The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences 32 (2002) 1199-1213
10. Eagly A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt M.C., and van Engen M.L. Transformational, transactional, and Laissez-Faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin 129 (2003) 569-591
11. García-Morales V.J., Matías-Reche F., and Hurtado-Torres N. Influence of transformational leadership on organizational innovation and performance depending on the level of organizational learning in the pharmaceutical sector. Journal of Organizational Change Management 21 (2008) 188-212
12. Haley H., and Sidanius J. Person-organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 8 (2005) 187-203
13. Heaven P.C.L., and Connors J.R. A note on the value correlates of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences 31 (2001) 925-930
14. Heaven P.C.L., Organ L.A., Supavadeeprasit S., and Leeson P. War and prejudice. A study of social values, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences 40 (2006) 599-608
15. Judge T.A., Piccolo R.F., and Ilies R. The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 1 (2004) 36-51
16. Kavanagh M.H., and Ashkanasy N.M. The impact of leadership and change management strategy on organizational culture and individual acceptance of change during a merger. British Journal of Management 17 (2006) S81-S103
17. Kristof A.L. Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology 1 (1996) 49
18. Kristof-Brown A.L., Zimmerman R.D., and Johnson E.C. Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology 58 (2005) 281-342
19. Lippa R., and Arad S. Gender, personality, and prejudice. The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality 33 (1999) 463-493
20. Muchinsky P.M., and Monahan C.J. What is Person-Environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior 31 (1987) 268-277
21. Nicol A.A.M. Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and their relation with alienation and spheres of control. Personality and Individual Differences 43 (2007) 891-899
22. Nicol A.A.M., Charbonneau D., and Boies K. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation in a Canadian Military Sample. Military Psychology 19 (2007) 239-257
23. Northouse P.G. Leadership: Theory and practice (2004), Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
24. Packard S.H., and Kauppi D.R. Rehabilitation agency leadership style: Impact on subordinates' job satisfaction. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 43 (1999) 5-11
25. Paunonen S.V. Hierarchical organization of personality and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (1998) 538-556
26. Paunonen S.V., and Ashton M.C. Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 524-539
27. Paunonen S.V., and Nicol A.A.M. The personality hierarchy and the prediction of work behaviors. In: Roberts B.W., and Hogan R. (Eds). Personality psychology in the workplace (2001), American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 161-191
28. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., and Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 879-903
29. Pratto F., Sidanius J., and Levin S. Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology 17 (2006) 271-320
30. Pratto F., Sidanius J., Stallworth L.M., and Malle B.F. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (1994) 741-763
31. Sheridan J.E., and Vredenburgh D.J. Usefulness of leadership behaviour and social power variables in predicting job tension, performance, and turnover of nursing employees. Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (1978) 89-95
32. Sibley C.G., and Duckitt J. Personality and prejudice. A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12 (2008) 248-279
33. Sidanius J., Levin S., Liu J., and Pratto F. Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (2000) 41-67
34. Sidanius J., and Pratto F. Social dominance (1999), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
35. Sidanius J., Pratto F., Sinclair S., and van Laar C. Mother Teresa meets Genghis Khan: The dialectics of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating career choice. Social Justice Research 9 (1996) 145-170
36. Stogdill R.M. Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire (1963), Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University, Form XII. Columbus, OH
37. Tsui A.S., Zhang Z., Wang H., Xin K.R., and Wu J.B. Unpacking the relationship between CEO leadership behavior and organizational culture. The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2006) 113-137
38. Umphress E.E., Simmons A.L., Boswell W.R., and Triana M. Managing discrimination in selection: The influence of directives from an authority and Social Dominance Orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (2008) 982-993
39. Umphress E.E., Smith-Crowe K., Brief A.P., Dietz J., and Watkins M.B. When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: Status composition, Social Dominance Orientation, and organizational attractiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (2007) 396-409
40. Vecchio R.P., Justin J.E., and Pearce C.L. The utility of transactional and transformational leadership for predicting performance and satisfaction within a path-goal theory framework. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 81 (2008) 71-82