To whom does voice in groups matter? Effects of voice on affect and procedural fairness judgments as a function of social dominance orientation

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 148, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 61-76

  De Cremer, David ^a   Cornelis, Ilse ^b   Van Hiel, Alain ^b  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Affect; Procedural fairness; Social dominance orientation; Voice

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; VOICE;

AFFECT; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 43849113944     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.148.1.61-76     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York: Sage.
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
3. Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality." In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Ashkanasy, N. M., Zerbe, W. J., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2002). Managing emotions in the workplace. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
5. Baden, J. A. (1998). A new primer for the management of common resources and public goods. In J. A. Baden & D. S. Noonan (Eds.), Managing the common (2nd ed., pp. 51-62). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
7. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
8. Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (2002). "Hot flashes, open wounds": Injustice and the tyranny of its emotions. In D. D. Steiner, D. P. Skarlicki, & S. W. Gilliland (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice (pp. 203-221). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
9. Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., & Fairchild, G. (2001). When do elements of procedural fairness make a difference? A classification of moderating influences. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Siegel, P. A., Wiesenfeld, B., Martin, C., Grover, S., et al. (1998). The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 394-407.
11. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
12. De Cremer, D. (2003). Why inconsistent leadership is regarded as procedurally unfair: The importance of social self-esteem concerns. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 535-550.
13. De Cremer, D., & Alberts, H. J. E. M. (2004). When procedural fairness does not influence how positive I feel: The effects of voice and leader selection as a function of belongingness need. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 333-344.
14. De Cremer, D., Brockner, J., Van den Bos, K., & Chen, Y. (2005). To whom does the relational model of procedural fairness apply? The moderating influence of interdependent self-construal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 155-167.
15. De Cremer, D., & Sedikides, C. (2005). Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 157-173.
16. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 151-218.
17. De Cremer, D., & Van Hiel, A. (2006). Effects of another person's fair treatment on one's own emotions and behaviors: The moderating role of how much the other cares for you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 231-249.
18. De Cremer, D., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 858-866.
19. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Duckitt, J., & Fisher, K. (2003). The impact of social threat on worldview and ideological attitudes. Political Psychology, 24, 199-222.
21. Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213.
22. Earley, P. C., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1148-1160.
23. Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24. Folger, R. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of "voice" and improvement of experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
25. Folger, R. (2001). Fairness as deonance. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (pp. 3-33). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
26. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Jost, J., & Major, B. (2001). The psychology of legitimacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657-669.
29. Korsgaard, M. A., & Sapienza, H. J. (2002). Economic and noneconomic mechanisms in interpersonal work relationships: Toward an integration of agency and procedural justice theories. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice (pp. 3-34). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
30. Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58-75.
31. Leung, K., & Tong, K.-K. (2003). Toward a normative model of justice. In S. W. Gilliland, D. D. Steiner, & D. P. Skarlicki (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on values in organizations (pp. 97-120). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
32. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange theory (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
33. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
34. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
35. Lippa, R., & Arad, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463-493.
36. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
37. Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769-783.
38. Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1053-1060.
39. Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252-283.
40. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
41. Posner, E. A. (2000). Law and social norms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: Piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 191-263). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
43. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
44. Schmitt, M., & Sabbagh, C. (2004). Synergistic person × situation interaction in distributive justice judgment and allocation behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 359-371.
45. Schroeder, D. A., Steel, J. E., Woodell, A. J., & Bembenek, A. F. (in press). Justice within social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
46. Sidanius, J., Liu, J., Pratto, F., & Shaw, J. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy-attenuators and hierarchy-enhancers: Social dominance theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338-366.
47. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 100-108.
49. Sniderman, P. M., Crosby, G. C., & Howell, W. G. (2000). The politics of race. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 236-279). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
50. Snyder, M., & Cantor, N. (1998). Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 635-679). New York: McGraw-Hill.
51. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 333-344.
53. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: The antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 850-863.
54. Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246.
55. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
56. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57. Tyler, T. R., & Smith, H. J. (1999). Justice, social identity, and group processes. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 223-264). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Van den Bos, K. (1999). What are we talking about when we talk about no-voice procedures? On the psychology of the fair outcome effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 560-577.
59. Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931-941.
60. Van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 1-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61. Van den Bos, K., & Spruijt, N. (2002). Appropriateness of decisions as a moderator of the psychology of voice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 57-72.
62. Van Hiel, A., & Duriez, B. (2002). Een meetinstrument voor individuele verschillen in sociale dominantie oriëntatie [A scale to measure individual differences in social dominance orientation]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psycholgie en haar Grensgebieden, 57, 114-116.
63. Van Hiel, A., & Kossowska, M. (2003). Lack of positive emotions, or too many negative feelings? Emotions as moderating variables for dispositional effects on prejudice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
64. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965-976.
65. Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 786-794.
66. Wilson, M. S. (2003). Social dominance and ethical ideology: The end justifies the means? The Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 549-558.