Hierarchical Organization of Personality and Prediction of Behavior

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 538-556

  Paunonen, Sampo V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032352795     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.538     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ashton, M. C. (in press). Personality and job performance: The importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
2. Ashton, M. C., Jackson, D. N., Paunonen, S. V., Helmes, E., & Rothstein, M. G. (1995). The criterion validity of broad factor scales versus specific trait scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 432-442.
3. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
4. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
5. Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. (1970). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
6. Cattell, R. B., & Krug, S. E. (1986). The number of factors in the 16PF: A review of the evidence with special emphasis on methodological problems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 509-522.
7. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Erlbaum.
8. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258-265.
9. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.
10. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Reply to Eysenck. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 861-865.
11. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992c). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
13. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
14. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
15. Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
16. Eysenck, H. J. (1992a). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
17. Eysenck, H. J. (1992b). A reply to Costa and McCrae: P or A and C - The role of theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 867-868.
18. Goldberg, L. R. (1972). Parameters of personality inventory construction and utilization: A comparison of prediction strategies and tactics. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 72(2).
19. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of personality traits: Vertical and horizontal aspects. In D. C. Funder, R. D. Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasey, & K. Widaman (Eds.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (pp. 169-188). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. Hampson, S. E., John, O. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 37-54.
21. Hase, H. D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1967). The comparative validity of different strategies of deriving personality inventory scales. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 231-248.
22. Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 627-637.
23. Hough, L. M. (1992). The "Big Five" personality variables-construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139-155.
24. Jackson, D. N. (1976). Jackson Personality Inventory manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
25. Jackson, D. N. (1977). Reliability of the Jackson Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 40, 613-614.
26. Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality Research Form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
27. Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson Personality Inventory-Revised manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
28. Jackson, D. N., & Paunonen, S.V. (1985). Construct validity and the predictability of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 554-570.
29. Jackson, D. N., Paunonen, S. V., Fraboni, M., & Goffin, R. G. (1996). A five-factor versus a six-factor model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 33-45.
30. John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Springer-Verlag.
31. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1992). Discriminant validity of the NEO-PI-R facet scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 229-237.
32. McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
33. Mershon, B., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Number of factors in the personality sphere: Does increase in factors increase the predictability of real-life criteria? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 675-680.
34. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford Press.
35. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Ones, D.S., Schmidt, F. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (1994, April). Do broader personality variables predict job performance with higher validity? Paper presented at the Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.
37. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609-626.
38. Paunonen, S. V. (1993, August). Sense, nonsense, and the Big Five factors of personality. Paper presented at the 101st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
39. Paunonen, S. V., & Gardner, R. C. (1991). Biases resulting from the use of aggregated variables in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 520-523.
40. Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1985). The validity of formal and informal personality assessments. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 331-342.
41. Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1996). The Jackson Personality Inventory and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 42-59.
42. Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., Trzebinski, J., & Forsterling, F. (1992). Personality structure across cultures: A multimethod evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 447-456.
43. Paunonen, S. V., Rothstein, M. G., & Jackson, D. N. (in press). Narrow reasoning about the use of broad personality measures in personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
44. Schneider, R. J., Hough, L. M., & Dunnette, M. D. (1996). Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 639-655.
45. Schönemann, P. H. (1990). Facts, fictions, and common sense about factors and components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 47-51.
46. Smith, G. M. (1969). Relations between personality and smoking behavior in preadult subjects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 710-715.
47. Stumpf, H. (1993). The factor structure of the Personality Research Form: A cross-national evaluation. Journal of Personality, 61, 27-48.
48. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. G. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
49. Velicer, W. F., Govia, J. M., Cherico, N. P., & Corriveau, D. P. (1985). Item format and the structure of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory. Aggressive Behavior, 11, 65-82.
50. Velicer, W. F., & Stevenson, J. F. (1978). The relation between item format and the structure of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 293-304.