Hip resurfacing - Keys to success

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 142-145

  Maguire, Cara M ^a   Seyler, Thorsten M ^a   Boyd, Harold S ^b   Lai, Lawrence P ^a   Delanois, Ronald E ^c   Jinnah, Riyaz H ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Willamette Orthopedic Group   (United States)

^c SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORTICOSTEROID; METAL;

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BODY MASS; BODY POSITION; BONE NECROSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CYST; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMUR HEAD; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; IMMATURITY; IMMUNE DEFICIENCY; KIDNEY FAILURE; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; MUSCLE ATROPHY; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE; OBESITY; OSTEOPENIA; OSTEOPOROSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; METALS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649460936     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jinnah RH, et al. Femoral neck fractures after metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing; a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:66-71. (Pubitemid 47494612)
2. Nunley RM, Delia Valle CJ, Barrack RL. Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;(467):56-65.
3. Stulberg BN, Trier KK, Naughton M, Zadzilka JD. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90(Suppl 3):21-26
4. Mont MA, Ragland PS, Etienne G, et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:454-463 (Pubitemid 44916635)
5. Mont MA, Schmalzried TP. Modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: important observations from the first ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:3-11.
6. Quesdada MJ, Marker DR, Mont MA. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:69-73.
7. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Zustin J, et al. Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):89-95.
8. Nizam I, Kohan L, Kerr D. Hip resurfacing in an 88-year-old patient? Highlighting selection criteria for hip resurfacings in patients older than 65 years. J Arthroplasty. 2008, Aug 1 Epub ahead of print.
9. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:436-441
10. Della Valle CJ, Nunley RM, Raterman SJ, Barrack RL. Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;(467):72-78
11. Yue EJ, Cabanela ME, Duffy GP, et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; Epub ahead of print.
12. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:463-464
13. McGrath MS, Desser DR, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Mont MA. Total hip resurfacing in patients who are sixty years of age or older. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):27-31.
14. Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC, Dorey, FJ. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(12):2705-2711 (Pubitemid 350230625)
15. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(6 Suppl 1):36-43.
16. Jameson SS, Langton DJ, Natu S, Nargol TV. The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an independent center analysis. J Arthroplasty 2008;23 (6 Suppl 1):50-55
17. McBryde CW, Shears E, O'Hara JN, Pynsent PB. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in developmental dysplasia: a case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(6):708-714
18. Beaule PE, Antoniades J. Patient selection and surgical technique for surface arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36 (2):177-185, viii-ix. (Pubitemid 40503995)
19. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff M, et al. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(418):87-93. (Pubitemid 38140428)
20. Griffiths DE, Acton K, Hull JB. Hip resurfacing with preservation of femoral head blood supply. Surgeon. 2008;6:115-119
21. Amarasekera HW, Costa MI, Foguet P, et al. The blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction during resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparison of two approaches using Laser Doppler flowmetry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:442-445 (Pubitemid 351542859)
22. Beaule PE, Campbell P, Shim P. Femoral head blood flow during hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;(456):148-52.
23. Steffen RT, Fern D, Norton M, et al. Femoral oxygenation during hip resurfacing through the trochanteric flip approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; Epub ahead of print.
24. McBryde CW, Revell MP, Thomas AM, et al. The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;(466):920-926
25. Boraiah S, Dyke JP, Hettrich C, et al. Assessment of vascularity of the femoral head using gadolinium (Gd-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:131-137
26. Steffen R, O'Rourke K, Gill HS, Murray DW. The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(10):1293-1298 (Pubitemid 350157308)
27. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;(465):63-70. (Pubitemid 350306495)
28. Radcliffe IAJ, Taylor M. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. Clinical Biomechanics. 2007;22:780-786 (Pubitemid 47017498)
29. Beaule PE, Le Duff M, Campbell P, et al. Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7-10 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec;19(8 Suppl 3):17-22. (Pubitemid 39575822)
30. Beckmann J, Goldapp C, Ringleff K, et al. Cementing technique in femoral resurfacing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008; Epub ahead of print.
31. Bitsch RG, Heisel C, Silva M, Schmalzried TP. Femoral cementing technique for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:423-431 (Pubitemid 46542028)
32. Ong KL, Manley MT, Kurtz SM. Have contemporary hip resurfacing designs reached maturity? A review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):81-88
33. Little JP, Gray HA, Murray DW, et al. Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:454-458
34. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Dorey FJ. The effects of technique changes on aseptic loosening of the femoral component in hip resurfacing: results of 600 conserve plus with a 3 to 9 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:481-489 (Pubitemid 46880181)
35. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Cementing the metaphyseal stem in metal-on-metal resurfacing: when and why. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;(467):79-83.