Multifocal visual evoked potential responses to pattern-reversal, pattern-onset, pattern-offset, and sparse pulse stimuli

Visual Neuroscience

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 227-235

  Fortune, Brad ^a   Demirel, Shaban ^a   Bui, Bang V ^b  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Contrast; Electrophysiology; Gain control; Multifocal VEP; Visual evoked potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STIMULATION; STIMULUS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 67649405038     PISSN: 09525238     EISSN: 14698714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952523808080954     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BASELER, H.A., SUTTER, E.E., KLEIN, S.A. & CARNEY, T. (1994). The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90, 65-81.
2. BRIGELL, M.G. (2001). The visual evoked potential. In Electrophysiological Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic Nerve, and Visual Pathway, ed. FISHMAN, G.A., BIRCH, D.G., HOLDER, G.E. & BRIGELL, M.G., pp. 237-279. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology.
3. FORTUNE, B., DEMIREL, S., ZHANG, X., HOOD, D.C. & JOHNSON, C.A. (2006). Repeatability of normal multifocal VEP: Implications for detecting progression. Journal of Glaucoma 15, 131-141.
4. FORTUNE, B., DEMIREL, S., ZHANG, X., HOOD, D.C., PATTERSON, E., JAMIL, A., MANSBERGER, S.L., CIOFFI, G.A. & JOHNSON, C.A. (2007). Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 48, 1173-1180.
5. FORTUNE, B. & HOOD, D.C. (2003). Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 44, 1364-1375.
6. FORTUNE, B., ZHANG, X., HOOD, D.C., DEMIREL, S. & JOHNSON, C.A. (2004). Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP. Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology 109, 87-100.
7. FORTUNE, B., ZHANG, X., HOOD, D.C., DEMIREL, S., PATTERSON, E., JAMIL, A., MANSBERGER, S.L., CIOFFI, G.A. & JOHNSON, C.A. (2008). Effect of recording duration on the diagnostic performance of multifocal visualevoked potentials in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma 17, 175-182.
8. FRASER, C.L., KLISTORNER, A., GRAHAM, S.L., GARRICK, R., BILLSON, F.A. & GRIGG, J.R. (2006). Multifocal visual evoked potential analysis of inflammatory or demyelinating optic neuritis. Ophthalmology 113, e321-e323.
9. GOLDBERG, I., GRAHAM, S.L. & KLISTORNER, A.I. (2002). Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. American Journal of Ophthalmology 133, 29-39.
10. GRAHAM, S.L., KLISTORNER, A.I. & GOLDBERG, I. (2005). Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Archives of Ophthalmology 123, 729-739. (Pubitemid 41056594)
11. GRAHAM, S.L., KLISTORNER, A.I., GRIGG, J.R. & BILLSON, F.A. (2000). Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: Asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. Journal of Glaucoma 9, 10-19.
12. HOFFMANN, M.B., STRAUBE, S. & BACH, B. (2003). Pattern-onset stimulation boosts central multifocal VEP responses. Journal of Vision 3, 432-439.
13. HOOD, D.C. & GREENSTEIN, V.C. (2003). Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: Applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 22, 201-251.
14. HOOD, D.C., ODEL, J.G. & ZHANG, X. (2000a). Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41, 4032-4038.
15. HOOD, D.C., THIENPRASIDDHI, P., GREENSTEIN, V.C.,WINN, B.J., OHRI, N., LIEBMANN, J.M. & RITCH, R. (2004). Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: A comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 45, 492-498.
16. HOOD, D.C., ZHANG, X., GREENSTEIN, V.C., KANGOVI, S., ODEL, J.G., LIEBMANN, J.M. & Ritch, R. (2000b). An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: A possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41, 1580-1587.
17. HOOD, D.C., ZHANG, X., HONG, J.E. & CHEN, C.S. (2002). Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology 104, 303-320.
18. HOOD, D.C., ZHANG, X. & WINN, B.J. (2003). Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: How can a monocular test work? Journal of Glaucoma 12, 3-15.
19. JAMES, A.C. (2003). The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 44, 879-890. (Pubitemid 36159741)
20. JAMES, A.C., MADDESS, T., GOH, X.L. & WINKLES, N. (2005a). Spatially sparse pattern - pulse stimulation enhances multifocal visual evoked potential analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 46, E-Abstract 3602.
21. JAMES, A.C., RUSECKAITE, R. & MADDESS, T. (2005b). Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials. Visual Neuroscience 22, 45-54. (Pubitemid 40675764)
22. KLISTORNER, A. & GRAHAM, S.L. (2000). Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107, 2283-2299.
23. KLISTORNER, A.I. & GRAHAM, S.L. (2001). Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: Effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 42, 2145-2152.
24. KLISTORNER, A.I., GRAHAM, S.L., GRIGG, J.R. & BILLSON, F.A. (1998). Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 39, 937-950.
25. MADDESS, T., JAMES, A.C. & BOWMAN, E.A. (2005). Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials. Visual Neuroscience 22, 153-162. (Pubitemid 40897400)
26. MADDESS, T., JAMES, A.C., RUSECKAITE, R. & BOWMAN, E.A. (2006). Hierarchical decomposition of dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials. Visual Neuroscience 23, 703-712. (Pubitemid 46031683)
27. REGAN, D. (1989). Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine. New York: Elsevier.
28. RUSECKAITE, R., MADDESS, T., DANTA, G., LUECK, C.J. & JAMES, A.C. (2005). Sparse multifocal stimuli for the detection of multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 57, 904-913.
29. SUTTER, E.E. (1991). The fast m-transform: Fast computation of crosscorrelations with binary m-sequences. SIAM Journal on Computing 20, 686-694.
30. SUTTER, E.E. & TRAN, D. (1992). The field topography of ERG components in man - I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Research 32, 433-446.
31. ZHANG, X. & HOOD, D.C. (2004a). Increasing the sensitivity of the multifocal visual evoked-potential (mfVEP) technique: Incorporating information from higher order kernels using a principal component analysis method. Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology 108, 211-222.
32. ZHANG, X. & HOOD, D.C. (2004b). A principal component analysis of multifocal pattern reversal VEP. Journal of Vision 4, 32-43. (Pubitemid 39047423)
33. ZHANG, X., HOOD, D.C., CHEN, C.S. & HONG, J.E. (2002). A signal-tonoise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: An objective definition for poor records. Documenta Ophthalmologica. Advances in Ophthalmology 104, 287-302.