Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials

Visual Neuroscience

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 45-54

  James, Andrew C ^a   Ruseckaite, Rasa ^a   Maddess, Ted ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular suppression; Dichoptic; mfVEP; Multifocal; Pattern pulse; Sparse; System identification; Visual evoked potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 18744391076     PISSN: 09525238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952523805221053     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ARTES, P.H., IWASE, A., OHNO, Y., KITAZAWA, Y. & CHAUHAN, B.C. (2002). Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 43, 2654-2659.
2. ATKIN, A., WOLKSTEIN, M., BODIS-WOLLNER, I., ANDERS, M., KELS, B. & PODOS, S.M. (1980). Interocular comparison of contrast sensitivities in glaucoma patients and suspects. British Journal of Ophthalmology 64, 858-862.
3. BASELER, H.A., SUTTER, E.E., KLEIN, S.A. & CARNEY, T. (1994). The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90, 65-81.
4. BENARDETE, E.A. & KAPLAN, E. (1999). The dynamics of primate retinal ganglion cells. Visual Neuroscience 16, 344-368.
5. BENARDETE, E.A., KAPLAN, E. & KNIGHT, B.W. (1992). Contrast gain control in the primate retina: P cells are not X-like, some M cells are. Visual Neuroscience 8, 483-486.
6. DRAPER, N.R. & SMITH, H. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis. New York: Wiley.
7. FORTUNE, B. & HOOD, D.C. (2003). Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 44, 1364-1375.
8. FORTUNE, B., JOHNSON, C.A. & CIOFFI, G.A. (2001). The topographic relationship between multifocal electroretinographic and behavioral perimetric measures of function in glaucoma. Optometry and Vision Science 78, 206-214.
9. FORTUNE, B., SCHNECK, M.E. & ADAMS, A.J. (1999). Multifocal electroretinogram delays reveal local retinal dysfunction in early diabetic retinopathy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 40, 2638-2651.
10. GOLDBERG, I., GRAHAM, S.L. & KLISTORNER, A.I. (2002). Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. American Journal of Ophthalmology 133, 29-39.
11. GREENSTEIN, V.C., HOLOPIGIAN, K., HOOD, D.C., SEIPLE, W & CARR, R.E. (2000). The nature and extent of retinal dysfunction associated with diabetic macular edema. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 41, 3643-3654.
12. HOFFMANN, M.B., STRAUBE, S. & BACH, B. (2003). Pattern-onset stimulation boosts central multifocal VEP responses. Journal of Vision 3, 432-439.
13. HOOD, D. & ZHANG, X. (2000). Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: Comparing disease-related changes. Documenta Ophthalmologica 100, 115-137.
14. HOOD, D.C., ODEL, J.G. & ZHANG, X. (2000a). Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 41, 4032-4038.
15. HOOD, D.C., ZHANG, X., GREENSTEIN, V.C., KANGOVI, S., ODEL, J.G., LIEBMANN, M.J. & RITCH, R. (2000b). An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: A possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 41, 1580-1587.
16. JAMES, A.C. (2003). The pattern pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 44, 879-890.
17. JAMES, A.C. & MADDESS, T. (2000). Method and apparatus for assessing neural function by sparse stimuli; Australia Patent No. PQ 6465-00.
18. JAMES, A.C., MADDESS, T., PRICE, N. & YE, N. (2000). Dichoptic multiregion VEP kernels from short binary and ternary sequences. In ARVO, Vol. 41, pp. S490. Ft. Lauderdale, Florida: Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science.
19. JEFFREYS, D.A. (1971). Cortical source locations of pattern-related visual evoked potentials recorded from the human scalp. Nature 229, 502-504.
20. JEFFREYS, D.A. & AXFORD, J.G. (1972). Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin. Experimental Brain Research 16, 1-21.
21. KLISTORNER, A.I. & GRAHAM, S.L. (1999). Multifocal pattern VEP perimetry: Analysis of sectoral waveform. Documenta Ophthalmologica 98, 183-196.
22. KLISTORNER, A.I., GRAHAM, S.L., GRIGG, J.R. & BILLSON, F.A. (1998a). Electrode position and the multi-focal visual-evoked potential: Role in objective visual field assesement. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 26, 91-94.
23. KLISTORNER, A.I., GRAHAM, S.L., GRIGG, J.R. & BILLSON, F.A. (1998b). Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 39, 937-950.
24. MADDESS, T. & JAMES, A.C. (1998). Simultaneous binocular assessment of multiple optic nerve and cortical regions in diseases affecting nerve conduction. USA Patent No. 6,315,414.
25. MADDESS, T., JAMES, A.C., GOLDBERG, I., WINE, S. & DOBINSON, J. (2000a). Comparing a parallel PERG, automated perimetry, and frequency-doubling thresholds. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 41, 3827-3832.
26. MADDESS, T., JAMES, A.C., GOLDBERG, I., WINE, S. & DOBINSON, J. (2000b). A spatial frequency-doubling illusion-based pattern electro-retinogram for glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 41, 3818-3826.
27. MADDESS, T. & SEVERT, W.L. (1999). Testing for glaucoma with the frequency-doubling illusion in the whole, macular and eccentric visual fields. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 27, 194-196.
28. PALMOWSKI, A.M., SUTTER, E.E., BEARSE, M.A., JR. & FUNG, W. (1997). Mapping of retinal function in diabetic retinopathy using the multifocal electroretinogram. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 38, 2586-2596.
29. PALMOWSKI, A.M., SUTTER, E.E., BEARSE, M.A., JR. & FUNG, W. (1999). Multifocal electroretinogram (MF-ERG) in diagnosis of macular changes. Example: Senile macular degeneration. Ophthalmologe 96, 166-173.
30. PRESS, W.H., TEUKOLSKY, S.A., VETTERLING, W.T. & FLANNERY, B.P. (1992). Numerical Recipes in C - The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. REGAN, M.P. & REGAN, D. (1989). Objective investigation of visual function using a nondestructive zoom-FFT technique for evoked potential analysis. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 16, 168-179.
32. SUTTER, E. (1992). A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis. In Nonlinear Vision: Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Function, and Networks, ed. PINTER, R. B. & NABET, B., pp. 31-74. Ann Arbor, Michigan: CRC Press.
33. SUTTER, E. & TRAN, D. (1992). The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Research 32, 433-446.
34. VICTOR, J.D. & SHAPLEY, R.M. (1979a). The nonlinear pathway of Y ganglion cells in the cat retina. Journal of General Physiology 74, 671-689.
35. VICTOR, J.D. & SHAPLEY, R.M. (1979b). Receptive field mechanism of cat X and Y retinal ganglion cells. Journal of General Physiology 74, 275-298.
36. VICTOR, J.D., SHAPLEY, R.M. & KNIGHT, B.W. (1977). Nonlinear analysis of cat retinal ganglion cells in the frequency domain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 74, 3068-3072.
37. WALSH, T. (1990). The fields of vision. In Visual Fields, Examination and Interpretation, ed. WALSH, T., pp. 1-29. La Jolla, California: American Academy of Ophthalmology.