Increasing the sensitivity of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique: Incorporating information from higher order kernels using a principal component analysis method

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 211-222

  Zhang, Xian ^a   Hood, Donald C ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Higher order kernels; Multifocal VEP; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RECORDING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 7244261806     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-004-5323-3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 90(1): 65-81.
2. Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39(6): 937-50.
3. Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: A possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41(6): 1580-7.
4. Hood DC, Odel JG, Zhang X. Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41(12): 4032-8.
5. Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner AI. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 133(1): 29-39.
6. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003; 22(2): 201-51.
7. Hood DC, Zhang X, Winn BJ. Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: How can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma 2003; 12(1): 3-15.
8. Hood DC, Zhang X. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 100(2-3): 115-37.
9. Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, Zhang X, Ritch R, Liebmann JM, Hong JE, Chen CS, Thienprasiddhi P. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: Evidence of a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120(12): 1672-81.
10. Zhang X, Hood DC, Chen CS, Hong JE. A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: An objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol 2002; 104(3): 287-302.
11. Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man - I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 1992; 32(3): 433-46.
12. Baseler HA, Sutter EE. M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution. Vision Res 1997; 37(6): 675-90.
13. Slotnick SD, Klein SA, Carney T, Sutter E, Dastmalchi S. Using multi-stimulus VEP source localization to obtain a retinotopic map of human primary visual cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 110(10): 1793-800.
14. James AC. The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44(2): 879-90.
15. Zhang X, Hood DC. A principal component analysis of multifocal VEP. Vision, in press.
16. Hood DC. Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000; 19(5): 607-46.
17. Sutter EE. Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique. Vision Res 2001; 41(10-11): 1241-55.
18. Horton JC, Hoyt WF. The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109(6): 816-24.
19. Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Winn BJ, Ohri N, Liebmann JM et al. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: A comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2004; 45(2): 492-498.
20. Hood DC, Zhang X, Hong JE, Chen CS. Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol 2002; 104(3): 303-20.
21. Hood DC, Zhang X, Ohri N, Thienprasiddhi P, Xu L, Liebmann JM. Possible indices for minimizing false positives on the multifocal VEP test. ARVO Abstract, 2004; 3302.