Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials

Visual Neuroscience

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 153-162

  Maddess, Ted ^a   James, Andrew Charles ^a   Bowman, Elizabeth Anne ^a,b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Biology and Environment   (Australia)

Author keywords

Contrast gain control; Contrast response; Multifocal; Sparse stimuli; VEP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 21244505325     PISSN: 09525238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952523805222046     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ANDREISSEN, J. & BOUMA, H. (1976). Eccentric vision: Adverse interactions between line segments. Vision Research 16, 71-78.
2. ATKIN, A., WOLKSTEIN, M., BODIS-WOLLNER, I., ANDERS, M., KELS, B. & PODOS, S.M. (1980). Interocular comparison of contrast sensitivities in glaucoma patients and suspects. British Journal of Ophthalmology 64, 858-862.
3. BASELER, H.A. & SUTTER, E.E. (1997). M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution. Vision Research 37, 675-690.
4. BASELER, H.A., SUTTER, E.E., KLEIN, S.A. & CARNEY, T. (1994). The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 90, 65-81.
5. BENARDETE, E.A. & KAPLAN, E. (1999). The dynamics of primate retinal ganglion cells. Visual Neuroscience 16, 344-368.
6. BENARDETE, E.A., KAPLAN, E. & KNIGHT, B.W. (1992). Contrast gain control in the primate retina: P cells are not X-like, some M cells are. Visual Neuroscience 8, 483-486.
7. DI RUSSO, F., MARTINEZ, A., SERENO, M.I., PITZALIS, S. & HILLYARD, S.A. (2002). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping 15, 95-111.
8. FORTUNE, B. & HOOD, D.C. (2003). Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 44, 1364-1375.
9. GOLDBERG, I., GRAHAM, S.L. & KLISTORNER, A.I. (2002). Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. American Journal of Ophthalmology 133, 29-39.
10. HASEGAWA, S. & ABE, H. (2001). Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 42, 3341-3348.
11. HOFFMANN, M.B., STRAUBE, S. & BACH, B. (2003). Pattern-onset stimulation boosts central multifocal VEP responses. Journal of Vision 3, 432-439.
12. HOOD, D.C., ODEL, J.G. & ZHANG, X. (2000a). Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41, 4032-4038.
13. HOOD, D.C., ZHANG, X., GREENSTEIN, V.C., KANGOVI, S., ODEL, J.G., LIEBMANN, M.J. & RITCH, R. (2000b). An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: A possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41, 1580-1587.
14. JAMES, A.C. (2003). The pattern pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 44, 879-890.
15. JAMES, A.C. & MADDESS, T. (2000). Method and apparatus for assessing neural function by sparse stimuli; PCT Patent No. WO 0172211.
16. JAMES, A.C., RUSECKAITE, R. & MADDESS, T. (2005). Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials. Visual Neuroscience in press.
17. JEFFREYS, D.A. (1971). Cortical source locations of pattern-related visual evoked potentials recorded from the human scalp. Nature 229, 502-504.
18. JEFFREYS, D.A. & AXFORD, J.G. (1972). Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin. Experimental Brain Research 16, 1-21.
19. KAPLAN, E. & SHAPLEY, R.M. (1986). The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the U.S.A. 83, 2755-2557.
20. KITTERLE, F.L. & CORWIN, T.R. (1979). Enhancement of apparent contrast in flashed sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research 19, 33-39.
21. KLEIN, S. (1992). Optimizing the estimation of nonlinear kernels. In Nonlinear Vision: Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Function, and Networks, ed. PINTER, R. & NABET, B., pp. 31-74. Ann Arbor, Michigan: CRC Press.
22. KLISTORNER, A., CREWTHER, D.P. & CREWTHER, S.G. (1997). Separate magnocellular and parvocellular contributions from temporal analysis of the multifocal VEP. Vision Research 37, 2161-2169.
23. KLISTORNER, A.I., GRAHAM, S.L., GRIGG, J.R. & BILLSON, F.A. (1998). Electrode position and the multi-focal visual-evoked potential: Role in objective visual field assesment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 26, 91-94.
24. KULIKOWSKI, J.J. (1972). Relation of psychophycis and electrophysiology. Trace 6, 64-69.
25. LEE, Y.W. & SCHETZEN, M. (1965). Measurement of Wiener kernels of a non-linear system by cross-correlation. International Journal of Control 2, 237-254.
26. MADDESS, T. & JAMES, A.C. (1998). Simultaneous binocular assessment of multiple optic nerve and cortical regions in diseases affecting nerve conduction. USA Patent No. 6,315,414.
27. MADDESS, T, JAMES, A.C., RUSECKAITE, R. & BOWMAN, E. (2003). Hierarchical decomposition of multifocal visual evoked potential responses to dichoptic contrast reversing and temporally sparse stimuli. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 44, 4198.
28. MADDESS, T. & KULIKOWSKI, J.J. (1999). Apparent fineness of stationary compound gratings. Vision Research 39, 3404-3416.
29. MADDESS, T., MCCOURT, M.E., BLAKESLEE, B. & CUNNINGHAM, R.B. (1988). Factors governing the adaptation of cells in Area-17 of the cat visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics 59, 229-236.
30. MADDESS, T. & SEVERT, W. (1999). Testing for glaucoma with the frequency-doubling illusion in the whole, macular and eccentric visual fields. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 27, 194-196.
31. MCCLURKIN, J.W., OPTICAN, L.M. & RICHMOND, B.J. (1994). Cortical feedback increases visual information transmitted by monkey parvocellular lateral geniculate nucleus neurons. Visual Neuroscience 11, 601-617.
32. PRZYBYSZEWSKI, A.W., GASKA, J.P., FOOTE, W. & POLLEN, D.A. (2000). Striate cortex increases contrast gain of macaque LGN neurons. Visual Neuroscience 17, 485-494.
33. REPUCCI, M.A., SCHIFF, N.D. & VICTOR, J.D. (2001). General strategy for hierarchical decomposition of multivariate time series: Implications for temporal lobe seizures. Journal of Vision 29, 1135-1149.
34. RUSECKAITE, R., MADDESS, T. & JAMES, A. (2004). Sparse multifocal stimuli for the detection of multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology (submitted).
35. SCLAR, G., LENNIE, P. & DEPRIEST, D.D. (1989). Contrast adaptation in striate cortex of macaque. Vision Research 29, 747-755.
36. SCLAR, G., MAUNSELL, J.H.R. & LENNIE, P. (1990). Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Research 30, 1-10.
37. SNIPPE, H.P., FOOT, L. & VAN HATEREN, J.H. (2004). Asymmetric dynamics of adaptation after onset and offset of flicker. Journal of Vision 4, 1-12.
38. SOLOMON, S.G., WHITE, A.J. & MARTIN, PR. (2002). Extraclassical receptive field properties of parvocellular, magnocellular, and koniocellular cells in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience 22, 338-349.
39. VICTOR, J.D. & SHAPLEY, R.M. (1979a). The nonlinear pathway of Y ganglion cells in the cat retina. Journal of General Physiology 74, 671-689.
40. VICTOR, J.D. & SHAPLEY, R.M. (1979b). Receptive field mechanism of cat X and Y retinal ganglion cells. Journal of General Physiology 74, 275-298.
41. VICTOR, J.D., SHAPLEY, R.M. & KNIGHT, B.W. (1977). Nonlinear analysis of cat retinal ganglion cells in the frequency domain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 74, 3068-3072.
42. ZENGER-LANDOLT, B. & HEEGER, D.J. (2003). Response suppression in v1 agrees with psychophysics of surround masking. Journal of Neuroscience 23, 6884-6893.