Intrinsic dynamics of restriction endonuclease EcoO109I studied by molecular dynamics simulations and X-ray scattering data analysis

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 96, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 2808-2822

  Oroguchi, Tomotaka ^a   Hashimoto, Hiroshi ^a   Shimizu, Toshiyuki ^a   Sato, Mamoru ^a   Ikeguchi, Mitsunori ^a  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASE; WATER; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; RGGNCCY SPECIFIC TYPE II DEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; RGGNCCY-SPECIFIC TYPE II DEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; TYPE II SITE SPECIFIC DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE;

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA BINDING; ENZYME STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; RADIATION SCATTERING; SIMULATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; ENZYMOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; METABOLISM; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; SMALL ANGLE SCATTERING; TIME; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

DEOXYRIBONUCLEASES, TYPE II SITE-SPECIFIC; DNA; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOVEMENT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; SCATTERING, SMALL ANGLE; TIME FACTORS; WATER; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 67649373298     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3914     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Roberts, R. J., M. Belfort, T. Bestor, A. S. Bhagwat, T. A. Bickle, et al. 2003. A nomenclature for restriction enzymes, DNA methyltransferases, homing endonucleases and their genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:1805-1812.
2. Hashimoto, H., T. Shimizu, T. Imasaki, M. Kato, N. Shichijo, et al. 2005. Crystal structures of type II restriction endonuclease EcoO109I and its complex with cognate DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 280:5605-5610.
3. Koshland, D. E. 1958. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 44:98-104.
4. Tsai, C. J., S. Kumar, B. Ma, and R. Nussinov. 1999. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci. 8:1181-1190.
5. Boehr, D. D., D. McElheny, H. J. Dyson, and P. E. Wright. 2006. The dynamic energy landscape of dihydrofolate reductase catalysis. Science. 313:1638-1642.
6. Ådén, J., and M. Wolf-Watz. 2007. NMR identification of transient complexes critical to adenylate kinase catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:14003-14012.
7. Henzler-Wildman, K. A., V. Thai, M. Lei, M. Ott, M. Wolf-Watz, et al. 2007. Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory. Nature. 450:838-844.
8. Kitao, A., and N. Gō. 1999. Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:164-169.
9. Van Aalten, D. M. F., A. Amadei, A. B. M. Linssen, V. G. H. Eijsink, G. Vriend, et al. 1995. The essential dynamics of thermolysin: confirmation of the hinge-bending motion and comparison of simulations in vacuum and water. Proteins. 22:45-54.
10. Berendsen, H. J. C., and S. Hayward. 2000. Collective protein dynamics in relation to function. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 10:165-169.
11. +-induced domain closure in horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase. Biophys. J. 91:1823-1831.
12. Snow, C., G. Qi, and S. Hayward. 2007. Essential dynamics sampling study of adenylate kinase: comparison to citrate synthase and implication for the hinge and shear mechanisms of domain motions. Proteins. 67:325-337.
13. Krebs, W. G., V. Alexandrov, C. A. Wilson, N. Echols, H. Yu, et al. 2002. Normal mode analysis of macromolecular motions in a database framework: developing mode concentration as useful classifying statistic. Proteins. 48:682-695.
14. Tama, F., and C. L. Brooks III. 2002. The mechanism and pathway of pH induced swelling in cowpea chlorotic motte virus. J. Mol. Biol. 318:733-747.
15. Valadié, H., J. J. Lacapčre, Y. -H. Sanejouand, and C. Etchebest. 2003. Dynamical properties of the MscL of Escherichia coli: a normal mode analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 332:657-674.
16. Chunyan, X., D. Tobi, and I. Bahar. 2003. Allosteric changes in protein structure computed by a simple mechanical model: hemoglobin T ↔ R2 transition. J. Mol. Biol. 333:153-168.
17. Tobi, D., and I. Bahar. 2005. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:18908-18913.
18. 1-ATPase. J. Mol. Biol. 340:345-372.
19. Ikeguchi, M., J. Ueno, M. Sato, and A. Kidera. 2005. Protein structural change upon ligand binding: linear response theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94:078102.
20. Karplus, M., and J. A. McCammon. 2002. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:646-652.
21. Karplus, M., and J. Kuriyan. 2005. Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 102:6679-6685.
22. Bernadó , P., E. Mylonas, M. V. Petoukhov, M. Blackledge, and D. I. Svergun. 2007. Structural characterization of flexible proteins using small-angle x-ray scattering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:5656-5664.
23. Seki, Y., T. Tomizawa, N. N. Khechinashvili, and K. Soda. 2002. Contribution of solvent water to the solution x-ray scattering profile of proteins. Biophys. Chem. 95:235-252.
24. Merzel, F., and J. C. Smith. 2002. SASSIM: a method for calculating small-angle x-ray and neutron scattering and the associated molecular envelope from explicit-atom models of solvated proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58:242-249.
25. Shih, A. Y., L. G. Denisov, J. C. Phillips, S. G. Sligar, and K. Schulten. 2005. Molecular dynamics simulations of discoidal bilayers assembled from truncated human lipoproteins. Biophys. J. 88:548-556.
26. Lau, A. Y., and B. Roux. 2007. The free energy landscapes governing conformational changes in a glutamate receptor ligand-binding domain. Structure. 15:1203-1214.
27. Putnam, C. D., M. Hammel, G. L. Hura, and J. A. Tainer. 2007. X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation: defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in solution. Q. Rev. Biophys. 40:191-285.
28. Vachette, P., and D. I. Svergun. 2000. Small-angle x-ray scattering by solutions of biologicalmacromolecules. In Structure andDynamics of Biomolecules. E. Fanchon, G. Geissler, J. -L. Hodeau, J. -R. Regnard, and P. A. Timmins, editors. Oxford University Press, New York. 199-237.
29. Guinier, A., and G. Fournet. 1955. Small-angle scattering of X-rays. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
30. Kitao, A., F. Hirata, and N. Gō. 1991. The effect of solvent on the conformation and the collective motions of protein: normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulations of melitin in water and in vacuum. Chem. Phys. 158:447-472.
31. García, A. E. 1992. Large-amplitude nonlinear motions in proteins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68:2696-2699.
32. Amadei, A., A. B. M. Linssen, and H. J. C. Berendsen. 1993. Essential dynamics of proteins. Proteins. 17:412-425.
33. Ikeguchi, M. 2004. Partial rigid-body dynamics in NPT, NPAT and NPγT ensembles for proteins and membranes. J. Comput. Chem. 25:529-541.
34. MacKerell, A. D., Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack, Jr., J. D. Evanseck, et al. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 102:3586-3616.
35. Jorgensen, W. L., J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, R. W. Impey, and M. L. Klein. 1983. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79:926-935.
36. Essmann, U., L. Perera, M. L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee, et al. 1995. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103:8577-8593.
37. Martyna, G. J., D. J. Tobias, and M. L. Klein. 1994. Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms. J. Chem. Phys. 101:4177-4189.
38. Stuhrmann, H. B. 1970. Interpretation of small-angle scattering functions of dilute solutions and gases. A representation of the structures related to a one-particle-scattering function. Acta Crystallogr. A. 26:297-306.
39. Svergun, D. I., C. Barberato, and M. H. J. Koch. 1995. CRYSOL: a program to evaluate x-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J. Appl. Cryst. 28:768-773.
40. Svergun, D. I., S. Richard, M. H. J. Koch, Z. Sayers, S. Kuprin, et al. 1998. Protein hydration in solution: experimental observation by x-ray and neutron scattering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:2267-2272.
41. Merzel, F., and J. C. Smith. 2002. Is the first hydration shell of lysozyme of higher density than bulk water? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:5378-5383.
42. Rosenberg, J. M. 1991. Structure and function of restriction endonucleases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1:104-113.
43. Doruker, P., L. Nilsson, and O. Kurkcuoglu. 2006. Collective dynamics of EcoRI-DNA complex by elastic network model and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 24:1-15.
44. Pingoud, A., and A. Jeltsch. 2001. Structure and function type II restriction endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:3705-3727.
45. Maslen, E. N., A. G. Fox, and M. A. O'Keefe. 1999. X-ray scattering. In International Tables for Crystallography. A. J. C. Wilson and E. Prince, editors. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 548-575.
46. Abramowitz, M., and I. A. Stegun. 1970. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York.
47. Soda, K., Y. Miki, T. Nishizawa, and Y. Seki. 1997. New method for incorporating solvent influence into the evaluation of x-ray scattering intensity of proteins in solution. Biophys. Chem. 65:45-53.