Using mobile phone messaging as a response medium in classroom experiments

Journal of Economic Education

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 51-67

  Cheung, Stephen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Classroom experiments; Mobile phones; Text messaging

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649313343     PISSN: 00220485     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JECE.39.1.51-67     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, L. R. 2001. Public choice as an experimental science. In The Elgar companion to public choice, ed. W. Shugart and L. Razzolini. 497-511. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
2. Andreoni, J., and E. Blanchard. 2006. Testing subgame perfection apart from fairness in ultimatum games. Experimental Economics 9 (4): 307-21.
3. Andreoni, J., M. Castillo, and R. Petrie. 2003. What do bargainers' preferences look like? Experiments with a convex ultimatum game. American Economic Review 93 (3): 672-85.
4. Andreoni, J., and R. Croson. Forthcoming. Partners versus strangers: Random rematching in public goods experiments. In Handbook of experimental economics results, ed. C. Plott and V. L. Smith. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. A. T. Kearney Inc. 2002. Mobinet index #5. http://www.atkearney. com/shared-res/pdf/ Mobinet-5-S.pdf.
6. Ball, S. B., and C. C. Eckel. 2004. Using technology to facilitate active learning in economics through experiments. Social Science Computer Review 22 (4): 469-78.
7. Brenner, T., and N. J. Vriend. 2006. On the behavior of proposers in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61 (4): 617-31.
8. Cheung, S. L. 2005. Mobile simulation gaming in economics education: Progress and prospects. In Mobile learning 2005, ed. P. Isaias, C. Borg, P. Kommers, and P. Bonanno. Lisbon, Portugal: IADIS.
9. Dawes, R. M., and R. H. Thaler. 1988. Anomalies: Cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (3): 187-97.
10. Dickenson, D. L. 2002. A bargaining experiment to motivate discussion on fairness. Journal of Economic Education 33 (2): 136-51.
11. Elliott, C. 2003. Using a personal response system in economics teaching. International Review of Economics Education 1 (1): 80-86.
12. Forsythe, R., J. L. Horowitz, N. E. Savin, and M. Sefton. 1994. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 6 (3): 347-69.
13. Harrison, G. W., and K. A. McCabe. 1996. Expectations and fairness in a simple bargaining experiment. International Journal of Game Theory 25 (3): 303-27.
14. Holt, C. A. 2007. Markets, games, and strategic behavior. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
15. Kreps, D. M., P. Milgrom, J. Roberts, and R. Wilson. 1982. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory 27 (2): 245-52.
16. Kvavik, R. B., and J. B. Caruso. 2005. ECAR study of students and information technology 2005: Convenience, connection, control, and learning. Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research.
17. Leuthold, J. H. 1993. A free-rider experiment for the large class. Journal of Economic Education 24 (3): 353-63.
18. Sanfey, A. G., J. K. Rilling, J. A. Aronson, L. E. Nystrom, and J. D. Cohen. 2003. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science 300 (5626): 1755-58.
19. Sulock, J. M. 1990. The free rider and voting paradox "games." Journal of Economic Education 21 (1): 65-69.
20. Thaler, R. H. 1988. Anomalies: The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (4): 195-206.
21. Williams, A. W., and J. M. Walker. 1993. Computerized laboratory exercises for microeconomics education: Three applications motivated by experimental economics. Journal of Economic Education 24 (3): 291-315.