Responsibilities of theorists: The case of communicative planning theory

Progress in Planning

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-51

  Sager, Tore ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Communicative planning; Dual theory; Misuse of theory; Planning theory; Responsibility; Unintended effects

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; PLANNING THEORY;

EID: 67649200374     PISSN: 03059006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2009.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (214)

1. Adams St. Pierre E. The responsibilities of readers: Toward an ethics of responses. Qualitative Sociology 19 4 (1996) 533-538
2. AESOP (2007). Research ethics in planning: Proposal for an AESOP thematic group. Accessed 28 May 2007.
3. Alic J.A. The dual use of technology: Concepts and policies. Technology in Society 16 2 (1994) 155-172
4. Allmendinger P. Planning theory (2002), Palgrave, Basingstoke, UK
5. Allmendinger P., and Gunder M. Applying Lacanian insight and a dash of Derridean deconstruction to planning's 'dark side'. Planning Theory 4 1 (2005) 87-112
6. Allmendinger P., and Tewdwr-Jones M. The communicative turn in urban planning: Unravelling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions. Space and Polity 6 1 (2002) 5-24
7. Alpern K.D. Engineers as moral heroes. In: Weil V. (Ed). Beyond whistleblowing: Defining engineers' responsibilities (Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Ethics in Engineering) (1983), Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 40-51
8. Amnesty International (2002a). Israel and the occupied territories. Shielded from scrutiny: IDF violations in Jenin and Nablus. 4 November 2002. Amnesty International Library, online documentation archive Accessed 27 March 2007.
9. Amnesty International (2002b). Israel and the occupied territories. The heavy price of Israeli incursions. Amnesty International Library, online documentation archive. Accessed 27 March 2007.
10. Arnett R.C. The responsive 'I': Levinas's derivative argument. Argument and Advocacy 40 1 (2003) 39-50
11. Arnstein S. But which advocate planner?. Social Policy 1 2 (1970) 33-34
12. Ashkinazy A. Are engineers responsible for the uses and effects of technology?. Professional Engineer 42 8 (1972) 46-47
13. Baldwin T. Foresight and responsibility. Philosophy 54 209 (1979) 347-360
14. Barnett C. Ways of relating: Hospitality and the acknowledgement of otherness. Progress in Human Geography 29 1 (2005) 5-21
15. Bates D. Crisis between the wars: Derrida and the origins of undecidability. Representations 90 (2005) 1-27
16. Bavetta S., and Guala F. Autonomy-freedom and deliberation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 4 (2003) 423-443
17. Behnegar N. The intellectual legacy of Leo Strauss (1899-1973). Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1999) 95-116
18. Bengs C. Time for a critique of planning theory. European Journal of Spatial Development (2005). http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/editorials.html Editorial No. 3. Accessed 29 April 2009
19. Bengs C. Planning theory for the naïve?. Comment in European Journal of Spatial Development (2005). http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/debate%20050718.pdf Accessed 29 April 2009
20. Bennett D.M., and Taylor D.McD. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emergency Medicine 15 3 (2003) 263-270
21. Bernstein R.J. The new constellation. The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
22. Berger P.L., and Luckman T. The social construction of reality (1966), Doubleday, Garden City, NY
23. Bohman J. Deliberative toleration. Political Theory 31 6 (2003) 757-779
24. In: Bohman J., and Rehg W. (Eds). Deliberative democracy (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Bok D. Beyond the ivory tower. Social responsibilities of the modern university (1982), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
26. Borradori G. Philosophy in a time of terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida (2003), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
27. Borry P., Schotsmans P., and Dierickx K. Author, contributor or just a signer? A quantitative analysis of authorship trends in the field of bioethics. Bioethics 20 4 (2006) 213-220
28. Bourdieu P. Acts of resistance: Against the new myths of our time (1998), Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
29. Bråten S. Model monopoly and communication: Systems theoretical notes on democratization. Acta Sociologica 16 2 (1973) 98-107
30. Bridgman P.W. Science and responsibility. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 4 3 (1948) 69-72
31. Brown N., Crawford I., Carley S., and Mackway-Jones K. A Delphi-based consensus study into planning for biological incidents. Journal of Public Health 28 3 (2006) 238-241
32. Burby R.J. Unleashing the power of planning to create disaster-resistant communities. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 3 (1999) 247-258
33. Christopher A.J. Apartheid planning in South Africa: The case of Port Elizabeth. Geographical Journal 153 2 (1987) 195-204
34. Churchill R.P. On the difference between non-moral and moral conceptions of toleration: The case for toleration as an individual virtue. In: Razavi M.E., and Ambuel D. (Eds). Philosophy, religion, and the question of intolerance (1997), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY 189-211
35. Clegg S., Kornberger M., and Rhodes C. Organizational ethics, decision making, undecidability. Sociological Review 55 2 (2007) 393-409
36. Cohen A.J. What toleration is. Ethics 115 1 (2004) 68-95
37. Collier P., and Hoeffler A. Unintended consequences: Does aid promote arms races?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69 1 (2007) 1-27
38. Connelly S., and Richardson T. Exclusion: The necessary difference between ideal and practical consensus. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47 1 (2004) 3-17
39. Cooke M. Authenticity and autonomy. Taylor, Habermas, and the politics of recognition. Political Theory 25 2 (1997) 258-288
40. Coole D. Habermas and the question of alterity. In: Passerin d'Entrèves M., and Benhabib S. (Eds). Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity (1996), Polity Press, Cambridge, UK 221-244
41. Critchley S. The ethics of deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas. 2nd ed. (1999), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
42. Critchley S. Five problems in Levinas's view of politics and the sketch of a solution to them. Political Theory 32 2 (2004) 172-185
43. Critchley S. Frankfurt impromptu-Remarks on Derrida and Habermas. In: Thomassen L. (Ed). The Derrida-Habermas reader (2006), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 98-110
44. Cuhls K., and Georghiou L. Evaluating a participative foresight process: 'Futur-the German research dialogue'. Research Evaluation 13 3 (2004) 143-153
45. Davidoff P. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31 4 (1965) 596-615
46. Davidoff P., and Davidoff L. Advocacy planning polarizes issues. Social Policy 1 2 (1970) 34-35
47. De Certeau M. The practice of everyday life (1984), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
48. Deetz S., and White W.J. Relational responsibility or dialogic ethics?. In: McNamee S., and Gergen J. (Eds). Relational responsibility (1999), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 111-120
49. DeLeon P., and deLeon L. What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 4 (2002) 467-492
50. Derrida J. The principle of reason: The university in the eyes of its pupils. Diacritics 13 3 (1983) 2-20
51. Derrida J. Jacques Derrida on the university. An interview (with Imre Salusinszky). Southern Review 19 1 (1986) 3-12
52. Derrida J. A certain 'madness' must watch over thinking. Educational Theory 45 3 (1995) 273-291
53. Derrida J. Adieu to Emmanuel Levinas (1999), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA
54. Derrida J. The university without condition. In: Derrida J. (Ed). Without Alibi (2002), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA 202-237
55. Derrida J. Following theory. In: Payne M., and Schad J. (Eds). Life after theory (2003), Continuum, London 1-51
56. Derrida J. Mochlos, or the conflict of the faculties. In: Derrida J. (Ed). Eyes of the university. Right to philosophy, Vol. 2 (2004), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA 83-112
57. Derrida J. The antinomies of the philosophical discipline: Letter preface. In: Derrida J. (Ed). Eyes of the university. Right to philosophy, Vol. 2 (2004), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA 165-174
58. Derrida J. Hostipitality. In: Thomassen L. (Ed). The Derrida-Habermas reader (2006), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 208-230
59. Derrida J., and Dufourmantelle A. Of hospitality (2000), Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA
60. Diesing P. Reason in society: Five types of decisions and their social conditions (1962), University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL
61. DiNardo J., and Lemieux T. Alcohol, marijuana, and American youth: The unintended consequences of government regulation. Journal of Health Economics 20 6 (2001) 991-1010
62. Dvir D., and Lechler T. Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: The impact of changes on project success. Research Policy 33 1 (2004) 1-15
63. Egéa-Kuehne D. Deconstruction revisited and Derrida's call for academic responsibility. Educational Theory 45 3 (1995) 293-309
64. Egéa-Kuehne D. The teaching of philosophy: Renewed rights and responsibilities. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 3 (2003) 271-284
65. Elwood S. Neighborhood revitalization through 'collaboration': Assessing the implications of neoliberal urban policy at the grassroots. GeoJournal 58 2-3 (2002) 121-130
66. Fischler R. Communicative planning theory: A Foucauldian assessment. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 4 (2000) 358-368
67. Flores A. Ethical problems in engineering. 2nd ed. (1980), Center for the Study of the Human Dimensions of Science and Technology, Troy, NY
68. Flyvbjerg B. The dark side of planning: Rationality and realrationalität. In: Mandelbaum S.J., Mazza L., and Burchell R.W. (Eds). Explorations in planning theory (1995), Rutgers, New Brunswick, NJ 383-394
69. Flyvbjerg B. Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society?. British Journal of Sociology 49 2 (1998) 210-233
70. Flyvbjerg B., and Richardson T. Planning and Foucault. In search of the dark side of planning theory. In: Allmendinger P., and Tewdwr-Jones M. (Eds). Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (2002), Routledge, London 44-62
71. Forester J. Listening: The social policy of everyday life (critical theory and hermeneutics in practice). Social Praxis 7 3-4 (1980) 219-232
72. Forester J. Planning in the face of power (1989), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
73. Forester J. Critical theory, public policy, and planning practice. Toward a critical pragmatism (1993), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
74. Friedmann J. Retracking America. A theory of transactive planning (1973), Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY
75. Friedmann J. Planning in the public domain. From knowledge to action (1987), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
76. Friedmann J. Empowerment. The politics of alternative development (1992), Blackwell, Oxford, UK
77. Friedmann J. Why do planning theory?. Planning Theory 2 1 (2003) 7-10
78. Friedmann J. The uses of planning theory. A bibliographic essay. Journal of Planning Education and Research 28 2 (2008) 247-257
79. Gabriel Y. On paragrammatic uses of organizational theory-A provocation. Organization Studies 23 1 (2002) 133-151
80. Gargiulo M., and Ertug G. The dark side of trust. In: Bachman R., and Zaheer A. (Eds). Handbook of trust research (2006), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK 165-186
81. Gauthier D.J. Levinas and the politics of hospitality. History of Political Thought 28 1 (2007) 158-180
82. Gerring J., and Thacker S.C. Do neoliberal economic policies kill or save lives?. Business and Politics 10 3 (2008). http://www.bepress.com/bap/vol10/iss3/art3 Article 3. Accessed 29 April 2009
83. Ghose R. The complexities of citizen participation through collaborative governance. Space and Polity 9 1 (2005) 61-75
84. Gottschalk P. Descriptions of responsibility for implementation: A content analysis of strategic information systems/technology planning documents. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 68 2 (2001) 207-221
85. In: Graham S. (Ed). Cities, war and terrorism. Towards an urban geopolitics (2004), Blackwell, Oxford, UK
86. Graham S. Remember Fallujah: Demonising place, constructing atrocity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23 1 (2005) 1-10
87. Graham S. Cities and the 'War on Terror'. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 2 (2006) 255-276
88. Gregory D. 'In another time-zone, the bombs fall unsafely...'. Targets, civilians and late modern war. Arab World Geographer 9 2 (2006) 88-111
89. Grunwald A. Technology assessment or ethics of technology?. Ethical Perspectives 6 2 (1999) 170-182
90. Gunder M. Passionate planning for the others' desire: An agonistic response to the dark side of planning. Progress in Planning 60 3 (2003) 235-319
91. Gunder M. Obscuring difference through shaping debate: A Lacanian view of planning for diversity. International Planning Studies 10 2 (2005) 83-103
92. Gunder M., and Hillier J. Problematising responsibility in planning theory and practice: On seeing the middle of the string?. Progress in Planning 68 2 (2007) 57-96
93. Habermas J. The idea of the university: Learning processes. New German Critique 41 (1987) 3-22
94. Habermas J. Moral consciousness and communicative action (1990), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
95. Habermas J. Justification and application. Remarks on discourse ethics (1993), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
96. Habermas J. In: Cooke M. (Ed). On the pragmatics of communication (1999), Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
97. Habermas J. Religious tolerance-The pacemaker for cultural rights. In: Thomassen L. (Ed). The Derrida-Habermas reader (2006), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 195-207
98. Hägglund M. The necessity of discrimination: Disjoining Derrida and Levinas. Diacritics: A Review of Contemporary Criticism 34 1 (2004) 40-71
99. Hansen D. Exploring the moral heart of teaching (2001), Teachers College Press, New York
100. Harper T.L., and Stein S. Dialogical planning in a fragmented society (2006), Rutgers/CUPR Press, New Brunswick, NJ
101. In: Harper T.L., Gar-On Yeh A., and Costa H. (Eds). Dialogues in urban and regional planning, Vol. 3 (2008), Routledge, New York
102. Hartman C. The advocacy planner: From 'hired gun' to political partisan. Social Policy 1 2 (1970) 37-38
103. Helman S. Monologic results of dialogue: Jewish-Palestinian encounter groups as sites of essentialization. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 9 3 (2002) 327-354
104. Hendley S. From communicative action to the face of the Other. Levinas and Habermas on language, obligation, and community (2000), Lexington Books, Lanham, MD
105. Hendley S. Speech and sensibility: Levinas and Habermas on the constitution of the moral point of view. Continental Philosophy Review 37 2 (2004) 153-173
106. Hillier J. 'Agon'izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be 'real'. Planning Theory 2 1 (2003) 37-59
107. Howitt R. Scale and the other: Levinas and geography. Geoforum 33 3 (2002) 299-313
108. Huxley M., and Yiftachel O. New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 4 (2000) 333-342
109. Innes J.E., and Booher D. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 4 (1999) 412-423
110. ISSS (2006). Sensitive areas of study and the US Department of State's Technology Alert List (last updated 21 December 2006). Accessed 24 March 2007.
111. Jacobs J. The death and life of great American cities (1965), Pelican Books, Harmondsworth, UK
112. Jonas H. The imperative of responsibility (1984), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
113. Jones C. Theory after the postmodern condition. Organization 10 3 (2003) 503-525
114. Jones P. Toleration, recognition and identity. Journal of Political Philosophy 14 2 (2006) 123-143
115. Jones P. Making sense of political toleration. British Journal of Political Science 37 3 (2007) 383-402
116. Joss S. Toward the public sphere-Reflections on the development of participatory technology assessment. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 22 3 (2002) 220-231
117. Kamete A.Y. Cold-hearted, negligent and spineless? Planning, planners and the (r)ejection of 'filth' in urban Zimbabwe. International Planning Studies 12 2 (2007) 153-171
118. Kessing S.G., Konrad K.A., and Kotsogiannis C. Foreign direct investment and the dark side of decentralization. Economic Policy 22 49 (2007) 6-70
119. Krumholz N., and Forester J. Making equity planning work (1990), Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA
120. Laburn-Peart C. Holding the knife on the sharp side. Rural women and planning in Mogopa, South Africa. Third World Planning Review 19 1 (1997) 71-90
121. LaCapra D. The university in ruins?. Critical Inquiry 25 1 (1998) 32-55
122. Ladenson R.F. The social responsibility of engineers and scientists: A philosophical approach. In: Flores A. (Ed). Ethical problems in engineering. 2nd ed. (1980), Center for the Study of the Human Dimensions of Science and Technology, Troy, NY 238-245
123. Lakoff S.A. Moral responsibility and the 'Galilean Imperative'. Ethics 91 1 (1980) 100-116
124. Levinas E. Totality and infinity. An essay on exteriority (1969), Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA
125. Levinas E. Otherwise than being or beyond essence (1981), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague
126. Levinas E. Entre nous: On thinking-of-the-other (1998), Columbia University Press, New York
127. Levinas E., and Kearney R. Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. In: Cohen R.A. (Ed). Face to face with Levinas (1986), SUNY Press, Albany, NY 13-33
128. LeVine M. Planning to conquer: Modernity and its antinomies in the 'New-old Jaffa'. In: Yacobi H. (Ed). Constructing a sense of place. Architecture and the Zionist discourse (2004), Ashgate, Aldershot 192-224
129. Lipari L. Listening for the Other: Ethical implications of the Buber-Levinas encounter. Communication Theory 14 2 (2004) 122-141
130. Mallon R. A field guide to social construction. Philosophy Compass 2 1 (2007) 93-108
131. Mandelbaum S. Reading plans. Journal of the American Planning Association 56 3 (1990) 350-356
132. Mann M. The dark side of democracy: The modern tradition of ethnic and political cleansing. New Left Review I/235 May-June (1999) 18-45
133. March J.G., and Olsen J.P. Garbage can models of decision making in organizations. In: March J.G., and Weissinger-Baylon R. (Eds). Ambiguity and command. Organizational perspectives on military decision making (1986), Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, MA 11-35
134. Marris P. Advocacy planning as a bridge between the professional and the political. Journal of the American Planning Association 60 2 (1994) 144-145
135. Mason R. Oppenheimer's choice. Reflections from moral philosophy (2006), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY
136. McCloskey D.N. The bourgeois virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce (2006), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
137. McGuirk P.M. Situating communicative planning theory: Context, power and knowledge. Environment and Planning A 33 2 (2001) 195-217
138. In: McNamee S., and Gergen K.J. (Eds). Relational responsibility: Resources for sustainable dialogue (1999), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
139. Merton R.K. Social theory and social structure (1957), Free Press, London
140. Misselwitz, P., & Weizman, E. (2003). Military operations as urban planning. Mute Magazine-Culture and Politics after the Net. accessed 1 November 2006. Also in A. Franke (Ed.), Territories. Berlin: KW Institute for Contemporary Art.
141. Mitcham C. Responsibility and technology: The expanding relationship. In: Durbin P.T. (Ed). Technology and responsibility (1987), D. Reidel, Dordrecht 3-39
142. Mohl R.A. Stop the road: Freeway revolts in American cities. Journal of Urban History 30 5 (2004) 674-706
143. Molas-Gallart J. Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of 'dual-use' technology transfer. Research Policy 26 3 (1997) 367-385
144. Morell J.A. Why are there unintended consequences of program action, and what are the implications for doing evaluation?. American Journal of Evaluation 26 4 (2005) 444-463
145. Murray J.W. Bakhtinian answerability and Levinasian responsibility: Forging a fuller dialogical communicative ethics. Southern Communication Journal 65 2-3 (2000) 133-150
146. Murray J.W. The dialogical prioritization of calls: Toward a communicative model of justice. New Jersey Journal of Communication 11 1 (2003) 2-23
147. Murray J.W. Face to face in dialogue. Emmanuel Levinas and (the) communication (of) ethics (2003), University Press of America, New York
148. Myerson G. Democracy, argument and the university. Studies in Higher Education 20 2 (1995) 125-133
149. Neiman M. Urban operations: Social meaning, the urban built form, and economic function. In: Desch M.C. (Ed). Soldiers in cities: Military operations on urban terrain (2001), Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College, Carlisle, PA 139-148. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm%3FpubID=294 Accessed 13 April 2007
150. New Scientist (2006). Editorial. New Scientist, 14 October 2006.
151. O'Neill O. The dark side of human rights. International Affairs 81 2 (2005) 427-439
152. Oniščik M. The postmodern idea of the university and responsibility. Logos 47 (2006) 171-183
153. Palm E., and Hansson S.O. The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73 5 (2006) 543-558
154. Perry N. Travelling theory/nomadic theorizing. Organization 2 1 (1995) 35-54
155. Piven F.F. Whom does the advocacy planner serve?. Social Policy 1 1 (1970) 32-37
156. Pløger J. Strife: Urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory 3 1 (2004) 71-92
157. Popke E.J. Poststructuralist ethics: Subjectivity, responsibility and the space of community. Progress in Human Geography 27 3 (2003) 298-316
158. Popper K. Conjectures and refutations. 4th ed. (1972), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
159. Potts D. 'Restoring order'? Operation Murambatsvina and the urban crisis in Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies 32 2 (2006) 273-291
160. Raffoul F. On hospitality, between ethics and politics. Research in Phenomenology 28 1 (1998) 274-283
161. Reade E. Review article: The barefoot technocrat. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 8 3 (1991) 185-192
162. Rhodes C., and Brown A.D. Writing responsively: Narrative fiction and organization studies. Organization 12 4 (2005) 467-491
163. Richardson L., and Adams St. Pierre E. Writing: A method of inquiry. In: Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. (2005), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 959-978
164. Rogers T. The end-use problem in engineering ethics. PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association (1980), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL 464-480
165. Rowe G., and Frewer L.J. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 25 1 (2000) 3-29
166. Saad-Filho A., and Johnston D. Neoliberalism. A critical reader (2005), Pluto Press, London
167. Sager T. Communicative planning theory (1994), Avebury, Aldershot, UK
168. Sager T. Teaching planning theory as order or fragments?. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14 3 (1995) 166-173
169. Sager T. Loyalty and the impossibility of Paretian advocacy planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 18 2 (1998) 103-112
170. Sager T. Democratic planning and social choice dilemmas (2002), Ashgate, Aldershot, UK
171. Sager T. Communicative planners as naïve mandarins of the neo-liberal state?. Comment in European Journal of Spatial Development (2005). http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/ Accessed 29 April 2009
172. Sager T. The logic of critical communicative planning: Transaction cost alteration. Planning Theory 5 3 (2006) 223-254
173. Sager T. Communicative planners as naïve mandarins of the neo-liberal state?. Paper to the 47th annual ACSP conference. 9-12 November 2006, Fort Worth, TX (2006)
174. Sager T., and Ravlum I.-A. The political relevance of planners' analysis: The case of a parliamentary standing committee. Planning Theory 4 1 (2005) 33-65
175. Sanyal B. Globalization, ethical compromise and planning theory. Planning Theory 1 2 (2002) 116-123
176. Sartre J.-P. Critique of dialectical reason (1982), Verso, London
177. Schot J. Towards new forms of participatory technology development. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 13 1 (2001) 39-52
178. Schot J., and Rip A. The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 2-3 (1996) 251-268
179. Scott A.J. The urban land nexus and the state (1980), Pion, London
180. Scott A.J., and Roweis S.T. Urban planning in theory and practice: A reappraisal. Environment and Planning A 9 10 (1977) 1097-1119
181. Simmons W. The Third: Levinas' theoretical move from an-archical ethics to the realm of justice and politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 6 (1999) 83-104
182. Sokoloff W.W. Between justice and legality: Derrida on decision. Political Research Quarterly 58 2 (2005) 341-352
183. Spivak G.C. Responsibility. Boundary 2 21 3 (1994) 19-64
184. Tamari D. Military operations in urban environments: The case of Lebanon, 1982. In: Desch M.C., and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). Soldiers in cities: Military operations on urban terrain (2001), Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College, Carlisle, PA 29-55. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm%3FpubID=294 Accessed 13 April 2007
185. Tarnow E. Coauthorship in physics. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 1 (2002) 175-190
186. Taylor C. The politics of recognition. In: Gutman A. (Ed). Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 25-73
187. Tengland P.-A. Empowerment: A conceptual discussion. Health Care Analysis 16 2 (2008) 77-96
188. Tewdwr-Jones M., and Allmendinger P. Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A 30 11 (1998) 1975-1989
189. In: Thomassen L. (Ed). The Derrida-Habermas reader (2006), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
190. Thomassen L. The inclusion of the other? Habermas and the paradox of tolerance. Political Theory 34 4 (2006) 439-462
191. Thompson D.F. Restoring responsibility (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York
192. Trey G.A. Communicative ethics in the face of alterity: Habermas, Levinas and the problem of post-conventional universalism. Praxis International 11 4 (1992) 412-427
193. Trifonas P.P. Technologies of reason. Academic responsibility beyond the principle of reason as the metaphysical foundation of the university. In: Trifonas P.P. (Ed). The ethics of writing. Derrida, deconstruction, and pedagogy (2000), Rowman and Littlefield, Oxford, UK 89-133
194. Trifonas P.P. The ethics of science and/as research: Deconstruction and the orientations of a new academic responsibility. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 3 (2003) 285-295
195. Tsivacou I. The written form of planning. Scandinavian Journal of Management 12 1 (1996) 69-88
196. Unger S.H. Controlling technology. Ethics and the responsible engineer. 2nd ed. (1994), John Wiley, New York
197. Vernon R. Unintended consequences. Political Theory 7 1 (1979) 57-73
198. Wang H. Aporias, responsibility and the im/possibility of teaching multicultural education. Educational Theory 55 1 (2005) 45-60
199. Watson V. The usefulness of normative planning theories in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa. Planning Theory 1 1 (2002) 27-52
200. Watson V. Deep difference: Diversity, planning and ethics. Planning Theory 5 1 (2006) 31-50
201. Weizman E. Lethal theory. Log 7 Winter/Spring (2006) 53-78
202. Weizman E. Walking through walls. Soldiers as architects in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Radical Philosophy 136 March/April (2006) 8-22
203. Weizman E. Hollow land. Israel's architecture of occupation (2007), Verso, London
204. Weltzin J.F., Belote R.T., Williams L.T., Keller J.K., and Engel E.C. Authorship in ecology: Attribution, accountability and responsibility. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4 8 (2006) 435-441
205. Wikipedia (2007). Technology. Accessed 2 May 2007.
206. Wolf S. Moral saints. Journal of Philosophy 79 8 (1982) 419-439
207. Yiftachel O. The dark side of modernism: Planning as control of an ethnic minority. In: Watson S., and Gibson K. (Eds). Postmodern cities and spaces (1995), Blackwell, Oxford 216-242
208. Yiftachel O. Planning as control: Policy and resistance in a deeply divided society. Progress in Planning 44 2 (1995) 115-184
209. Yiftachel O. Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Journal of Planning Literature 12 4 (1998) 395-406
210. Yiftachel O. Planning theory at a crossroad: The third Oxford conference. Journal of Planning Education and Research 18 3 (1999) 267-270
211. Yiftachel O. Social control, urban planning and ethno-class relations: Mizrahi Jews in Israel's 'development towns'. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 2 (2000) 418-438
212. Yiftachel O. Re-engaging planning theory? Towards 'South-Eastern' perspectives. Planning Theory 5 3 (2006) 211-222
213. Young I.M. Inclusionary democracy (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
214. Zaborowski H. On freedom and responsibility: Remarks on Sartre, Levinas and Derrida. Heythrop Journal 41 1 (2000) 47-65