Neighborhood revitalization through 'collaboration': Assessing the implications of neoliberal urban policy at the grassroots

GeoJournal

Volumn 58, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 121-130

  Elwood, Sarah ^a  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative governance; Community based planning; Neoliberal urban policy

Indexed keywords

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; URBAN PLANNING;

DOWNSIZING; NEOLIBERAL POLICIES;

PUBLIC POLICY;

LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NEOLIBERALISM; PLANNING PROCESS; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLITICS; URBAN RENEWAL;

MINNEAPOLIS; MINNESOTA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1642312804     PISSN: 03432521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/b:gejo.0000010831.73363.e3     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Atkinson R., 1999: Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration. Urban Studies 36: 59-72.
2. Barber B., 1984: Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics For a New Age. University of California Press, Berkeley.
3. Berger R., Campbell C., Kasper G., Mayer N., & Sylvan J., 2000: Neighborhood Revitalization Program Evaluation Report, Executive Summary, Phase 1: 1990-1999.: Teamworks: San Francisco, 9 Van Buren Street, San Francisco, CA 94131.
4. Boyte H., 1989: Commonwealth: A Return To Citizen Politics. Free Press: New York.
5. Brenner N. and Theodore N., 2001: The urbanization of neoliberalism. Conference proceedings: Neoliberalism and the City. Chicago, Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois-Chicago.
6. Brauer D., 2001: Why NRP? Because, despite flaws, it has energized people and neighborhoods. Southwest Journal [electronic edition], 25 July 2001.
7. Day E., 2001: There goes the neighborhood. Pulse of the Twin Cities 5: 1 (cover story). 11 July 2001.
8. Elwood S., 2002: GIS and collaborative urban governance: Understanding their implications for community action and power. Urban Geography 22: 737-759.
9. Fainstein S. and Hirst C., 1996: Neighborhood organizations and community planning: The Minneapolis neighborhood revitalization program. In: Keating W., Krumholz N., and Star P. (eds), Revitalizing Urban Neighborhoods, pp. 96-111. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.
10. Fisher R., 1994: Let the People Decide: Neighborhood Organizing in America, 2nd ed. Maxwell Macmillan: New York.
11. Goetz E. and Sidney M., 1994, Revenge of the property owners: Community development and the politics of property. Journal of Urban Affairs 16: 319-334.
12. Goetz, E. and Sidney, M., 1997: Local policy subsystems and issue definition. Urban Affairs Review 32(4): 490-513.
13. Gough J., 2001: Neoliberalism and socialization in the contemporary city: Opposites, complements and instabilities. Conference proceedings: Neoliberalism and the City. Chicago, Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois-Chicago.
14. Grieder, W., 1992: Who Will Tell The People: The Betrayal Of American Democracy. Touchstone Press, New York.
15. Handler J., 1996: Down From Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
16. Harvey D., 1989: From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler 71B: 3-17.
17. Hasson S. and Ley D., 1994: Neighbourhood Organizations and the Welfare State. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
18. Healy P., 1997: Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
19. Hula R., 2001: Governing non-profits and local political processes. Urban Affairs Review 36: 324-359.
20. Jacobs B., 1992: Fractured Cities: Capitalism, Community, And Empowerment In Britain And America. Routledge, New York.
21. Jessop B., 2001: Good governance and the urban question: On managing the contradictions of neoliberalism. Conference proceedings: Neoliberalism and the City. Chicago, Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois-Chicago.
22. Kearns A. and Paddison R., 2000: New challenges for urban governance: Introduction to the review issue. Urban Studies 37: 845-850.
23. Killackey B., 2000: Neighborhood organizations gained power in 10 years of NRP. Southwest Journal [electronic edition], 26 June 2000.
24. Krieger J., 1986: Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Decline. Oxford University Press, London & New York.
25. Lake R. and Newman K., 2002: Differential citizenship in the shadow state. Conference proceedings: Rights to the City. Rome, Italy, May 2002. International Geographical Union.
26. Leitner H. and Garner M., 1993: The limits of local initiatives: A reappraisal of urban entrepreneurialism for urban development. Urban Geography 14: 57-77.
27. Mack L., 2001: Neighborhood program gears up for second phase. Minneapolis Star-Tribune, 25 February 2001, section 2, p. 1.
28. Maloney W., Jordan G., and McLaughlin A., 1994: Interest groups and public policy: The insider/outsider model revisited. Journal of Public Policy 14: 17-38.
29. Marcy-Holmes Phase I Neighborhood Action Plan, 2000. Generated 2 December 2002, Http://nrp.org/r2/PlanNetNRP/default.html.
30. Moody K., 1997: Workers In A Lean World: Unions In The International Economy. Verso Books, New York.
31. Nickel D., 1995: The progressive city? Urban redevelopment in Minneapolis. Urban Affairs Review 30: 355-377.
32. North P., 2003, forthcoming: Community action and partnerships for urban regeneration: New sites of struggle? In Imrie R. and Raco M. (eds), Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community, and Urban Policy. The Policy Press, Bristol.
33. Peck J. and Tickell A., 1994: Too many partnerships. . .the future for regeneration partnerships. Local Economy 9: 251-265.
34. Peck J. and Tickell A., 2001: Neoliberalizing space: The free economy and the penal state. Conference proceedings: Neoliberalism and the City. Chicago, Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois-Chicago.
35. Phillips Phase I Neighborhood Action Plan, 2000. Generated 2 December 2002, Http://nrp.org/r2/PlanNetNRP/default.html.
36. Picone L., 2001: Why we care about NRP - it gave every neighborhood a reason to look at its needs and priorities. Southwest Journal [electronic edition], 9 July 2001.
37. Pitcoff W., 1999: Planning power. Shelterforce: The Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Building, Vol. 108. Available at http://www.nhi.org.
38. Piven F. and Cloward R., 1977: Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. Pantheon Books, New York.
39. Prospect Park Phase 1 Neighborhood Action Plan, 2000. Generated 2 December 2002, Http://nrp.org/r2/PlanNetNRP/default.html.
40. Purcell M., 2002: Urban enfranchisement and the right to the city: The politics of scale and of difference in implementing Lefebvre. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of American Geographers. Los Angeles, CA, March 2002.
41. Putnam R., 1995: Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6: 65-78.
42. Russell S., 2002: Whittier approves draft 7.4 million NRP Phase II plan. Southwest Journal [electronic edition]. 6 August 2002.
43. Sartin L., 2002: Powderhorn Park leads the way in NRP planning. Southside Pride (Phillips-Powderhorn Edition). October 2002, p. 3.
44. SCCO Neighborhood Revitalization Program Phase 2 Action Plan. 2002. Http://ssco-online.org/docs/NRPplansummary.htm. 20 October 2002.
45. Seward Phase I Neighborhood Action Plan. 2000. Generated 2 December 2002, Http://nrp.org/r2/PlanNefNRP/default.html.
46. Smith N., 2001: New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. Conference proceedings: Neoliberalism and the City. Chicago, Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois-Chicago.
47. St. Anthony N., 1999: Latin American business initiative ready to revive Bloomington and Lake. Minneapolis Star-Tribune, 20 April 1999, section 2, p. 1.
48. Staeheli L., Kodras J. and Flint C. (eds), 1997: State Devolution in America: Implications for a Diverse Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Stoker G., 1995: Regime theory and urban politics. In: Judge D. (ed), Theories of Urban Politics. Sage, London.
50. Stoecker R., 1994: Defending Community: The Struggle For Alternative Redevelopment in Cedar-Riverside. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
51. Stoecker R., 1997: The CDC model of urban redevelopment: A critique and an alternative. Journal of Urban Affairs 19: 1-22.
52. Taylor, M., 1999: Influencing policy: a UK voluntary sector policy perspective. In: Lewis, D. (ed.), International Perspectives on Voluntary Action: Reshaping the Third Sector, pp. 182-201. Earthscan, London.
53. Taylor M., 2000: Communities in the lead: Power, organisational capacity and social capital. Urban Studies 37: 1019-1036.
54. Tellijohn S., 2001: NRP Phase II plan puts $20 million to affordable housing, business corridors. Southwest Journal [electronic edition], 12 June 2001.
55. Wacquant L., 2001: The punishing City: The metropolis as incubator of neoliberal penality. Conference proceedings: Neoliberalism and the City. Chicago, Great Cities Institute, University of Illinois-Chicago.