Evaluating a participative foresight process: 'Futur - The German research dialogue'

Research Evaluation

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 143-153

  Cuhls, Kerstin ^a   Georghiou, Luke ^b  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22944447400     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154404781776437     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. H Banthien, K Cuhls and N Ludewig (2003), 'Introduction of Futur - the German research dialogue, about the Futur process', in Cuhis and Jaspers, 2003.
2. T J Buisseret, H M Cameron and L Georghiou (1995), 'What difference does it make? - additionally in the public support of R&D in large firms', International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4-6), pages 587-600.
3. K Cuhls (2003), 'Government foresight activities in Germany - the Futur process', paper prepared for the NISTEP Conference: The Third Generation Foresight and Prioritization in Science and Technology Policy - The Second International Conference on Technology Foresight - NISTEP/APEC Center for Technology Foresight, Tokyo, 27-28 February 2003.
4. K Cuhls and M Jaspers (eds) (2003), Participatory Priority-Setting for Research and Innovation Policy -Concepts, Tools and Implementation in Foresight Processes, Proceedings of the International Expert Workshop in Berlin, Karlsruhe/Berlin/Bensheim, 13-14 December 2002.
5. L Georghiou (2003a), 'Evaluation of Futur - intermediate results', in Cuhls and Jaspers, 2003.
6. L Georghiou (2003b), 'Evaluating foresight and lessons for its future impact, the third generation - foresight and prioritisation in science and technology policy', Second International Conference on Technology Foresight, NISTEP/ APEC Center for Technology Foresight, Tokyo, 27-28 February 2003.
7. L Georghiou and M Keenan (2004), 'Towards a typology for evaluating foresight exercises', Proceedings of EU-US Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting and Assessment Methods, IPTS, Joint Research Centre, Commission of the European Communities, Seville, 13-14 May 2004.
8. M Gibbons and L Georghiou (1987), Evaluation of Research (OECD: Paris).
9. E G Guba and Y S Lincoln (1989), Fourth Generation Evaluation (Sage: Newbury Park, CA).
10. D H Guston (2003), 'The expanding role of peer review processes in the United States', in P Shapira and S Kuhlmann (eds) Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe, (Edward Elgar: Cheltenham and Northampton, MA).
11. M Keenan (2000), An Evaluation of the Implementation of the UK Technology Foresight Programme, doctoral thesis, University of Manchester
12. S Kuhlmann (1998), 'Moderation of policy-making? science and technology policy evaluation beyond impact measurement: the case of Germany, Evaluation 4(2), pages 130-148, April.
13. S Kuhlmann, P Boekholt, L Georghiou, K Guy, J-A Héraud, P Larédo, T Lemola, D Loveridge, T Luukkonnen, W Polt, A Rip, L Sanz-Menendez and R Smits (1999), Improving Distributed Intelligence Systems in Complex Innovation Systems (Office for Official Publications of the European Union: Brussels and Luxembourg).
14. M Nedeva, L Georghiou, D Loveridge and H Cameron (1996), 'The use of co-nomination to identify expert participants for technology foresight', R&D Management, 26(2), pages 155-168.
15. Technology Futures Analysis Methods Working Group (2004), 'Technology futures analysis: toward integration of the field and new methods', Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, pages 287-303.