The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system at the nexus of plant biology

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 385-397

  Vierstra, Richard D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA 26S; ETHYLENE; F BOX PROTEIN; GIBBERELLIN DERIVATIVE; JASMONIC ACID; PHYTOHORMONE; PROTEASOME; UBIQUITIN;

ARABIDOPSIS; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HORMONE RESPONSE; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIGHT JUNCTION;

ARABIDOPSIS; CHROMATIN; ETHYLENES; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MORPHOGENESIS; PHOTOPERIOD; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEOME; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITIN;

ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; EUKARYOTA;

EID: 67349254570     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm2688     Document Type: Review

References (139)

1. [No authors listed.] Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (N. E. Merriam-Webster Publishers, springfield, Massachusetts, 1987).
2. Wilkinson, K. D., urban, M. K. & Haas, A. L. ubiquitin is the ATP-dependent proteolysis factor I of rabbit reticulocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 255, 7529-7532 (1980).
3. Downes, B. & Vierstra, R. D. Post-translational regulation in plants employing a diverse set of polypeptide tags. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 33, 393-399 (2005).
4. Kerscher, O., Felberbaum, R. & Hochstrasser, M. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 22, 1 59-180 (2006).
5. smalle, J. & Vierstra, R. D. The ubiquitin 26s proteasome proteolytic pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 555-590 (2004).
6. Harper, J. W. & schulman, B. A. structural complexity in ubiquitin recognition. Cell 124, 1133-1136 (2006).
7. Mukhopadhyay, D. & Riezman, H. Proteasome-independent functions of ubiquitin in endocytosis and signaling. Science 315, 201-205(2007).
8. Dreher, K. & Callis, J. ubiquitin, hormones and biotic stress in plants. Ann. Bot. 99, 787-822 (2007).
9. Raasi, s. & Wolf, D. H. ubiquitin receptors and ERAD: a network of pathways to the proteasome. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 18, 780-791 (2007).
10. Shen, G., Adam, Z. & Zhang, H. The E3 ligase AtCHIP ubiquitylates FtsH 1, a component of the chloroplast FtsH protease, and affects protein degradation in chloroplasts. Plant J. 52, 309-321 (2007).
11. Yan, N., Doelling,J. H., Falbel, T. G., Durski, A. M. & Vierstra, R. D. The ubiquitin-specific protease family from Arabidopsis. AtUBP1 and 2 are required for the resistance to the amino acid analog canavanine. Plant Physiol. 124, 1828-1843(2000).
12. schwechheimer, C. & Calderon Villalobos, L. I. Cullin-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases in plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 677-686 (2004).
13. Gingerich, D. J. et al. Cullins 3a and 3b assemble with members of the broad complex/tramtrack/bric-a-brac (BTB) protein family to form essential ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s) in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 18810-18821 (2005).
14. Downes, B. P.,stupar, R. M., Gingerich, D. J. & Vierstra, R. D. The HECT ubiquitin-protein ligase (uPL) family in Arabidopsis: uPL3 has a specific role in trichome development. Plant J. 35, 729-742 (2003).
15. Capron, A., Okresz, L. & Genschik, P. First glance at the plant APC/C, a highly conserved ubiquitin-protein ligase. Trends Plant Sci. 8, 83-89 (2003).
16. Kraft, E. et al. Genome analysis and functional characterization of the E2 and RING-type E3 ligase ubiquitination enzymes of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 139, 1597-1611 (2005).
17. stone, s. L. et al. Functional analysis of the RING-type ubiquitin ligase family of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 137, 13-30(2005).
18. Lee, J. H. et al.Characterization of Arabidopsis and rice DWD proteins and their roles as substrate receptors for CuL4-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases. Plant Cell 20, 152-167(2008).
19. Gagne, J. M., Downes, B. P.,shiu, s.-H., Durski, A. M. & Vierstra, R. D. The F-box subunit of the sCF E3 complex is encoded by a diverse superfamily of genes in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 11519-11524(2002).
20. Mudgil, Y, Shiu, s. H., stone, s. L., salt, J. N. & Goring, D. R. A large complement of the predicted Arabidopsis ARM repeat proteins are members of the u-box E3 ubiquitin ligase family. Plant Physiol. 134, 59-66 (2004).
21. Wiborg, J., O'shea, C. & skriver, K. Biochemical function of typical and variant Arabidopsis thaliana U-box E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases. Biochem. J. 413, 447-457 (2008).
22. Gingerich, D. J., Hanada, K., shiu, s. H. & Vierstra, R. D. Large-scale, lineage-specific expansion of a bric-a-brac/tramtrack/broad complex ubiquitin-ligase gene family in rice. Plant Cell 19, 2329-2348 (2007).
23. Jain, M. et al. F-box proteins in rice. Genome-wide analysis, classification, temporal and spatial gene expression during panicle and seed development, and regulation by light and abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. 143, 1467-1483(2007).
24. Yang, X. et al. The F-box gene family is expanded in herbaceous annual plants relative to woody perennial plants. Plant Physiol. 148, 1189-1200 (2008).
25. Stone, s. L., Williams, L. A., Farmer, L. M., Vierstra, R. D. & Callis, J. KEEP ON GOING, a RING E3 ligase essential for Arabidopsis growth and development, is involved in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 18, 3415-3428(2006).
26. Hotton,s. K. & Callis, J. Regulation of cullin RING ligases. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 467-489 (2008).
27. TIRIR1 complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8470-8475 (2008).
28. Wei, N. & Deng, X. W. The COP9 signalosome. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 261-286 (2003).
29. Yang, P. et al. Purification of the Arabidopsis 26s proteasome: biochemical and molecular analyses revealed the presence of multiple isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 6401-6413 (2004).
30. Book, A. J. et al. The RPN5 subunit of the 26s proteasome is essential for gametogenesis, sporophyte development, and complex assembly in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 460-478 (2009).
31. Voges, D., Zwickl, P. & Baumeister, W. The 26s proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 1015-1068(1999).
32. Husnjak, K. et al. Proteasome subunit Rpn13 isa novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 453, 481 -488 (2008).
33. Lyapina, s. et al. Promotion of NEDD-CuL1 conjugate cleavage by COP9 signalosome. Science 292, 1382-1385(2001).
34. Fu,H. et al. Multiubiquitin chain binding and protein degradation are mediated by distinct domains within the 26 s proteasome subunit Mcb 1. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1970-1981 (1998).
35. Smalle, J. et al. The pleiotropic role of the 26s proteasome subunit RPN10 in Arabidopsis growth and development supports a substrate-specific function in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15, 965-980 (2003).
36. smalle, J. et al. Cytokinin growth responses in Arabidopsis involve the 26s proteasome subunit RPN 12. Plant Cell 14, 17-32 (2002).
37. Brukhin, V., Gheyselinck, J., Gagliardini, V., Genschik, P. & Grossniklaus, u. The RPN 1 subunit of the 26s proteasome in Arabidopsisis essential for embryogenesis. Plant Cell 17, 2723-2737 (2005).
38. Ueda, M. et al. The HALTED ROOT gene encoding the 26s proteasome subunit RPT2a is essential for the maintenance of Arabidopsismeristems. Development 131, 2101-2111 (2004).
39. Zhang, F. X. et al. O-GIcNAc modification is an endogenous inhibitor of the proteasome. Cell 115, 715-725(2003).
40. Schmidt, M., Hanna, J., Elsasser, s. & Finley, D. Proteasome-associated proteins: regulation of a proteolytic machine. Biol. Chem. 386, 725-737 (2005).
41. Kurepa, J., Toh, E. A. & smalle, J. A. 26s proteasome regulatory particle mutants have increased oxidative stress tolerance. Plant J. 53, 102-114 (2008).
42. Ustrell, V., Hoffman, L., Pratt, G. & Rechsteiner, M. PA200, a nuclear proteasome activator involved in DNA repair. EMBO J. 21, 3516-3525 (2002).
43. Doelling,J. H., Yan, N., Kurepa, J., Walker, J. & Vierstra, R. D. The ubiquitin-specific protease uBP14 is essential for early embryo development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 27, 393-405 (2001).
44. Hanna, J. et al.Deubiquitinating enzyme ubp6 functions noncatalytically to delay proteasomal degradation. Cell 127, 99-111 (2006).
45. Doelling, J. H. et al. The ubiquitin-specific protease subfamily uBP3/uBP4 is essential for pollen development and transmission in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 145, 801-813 (2007).
46. Yang, P. et al. ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases 1 and 2 affect shoot architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 51, 441-457(2007).
47. Sridhar, V. V. et al.Control of DNA methylation and heterochromatic silencing by histone H2B deubiquitination. Nature 447, 735-738 (2007).
48. Luo, M. et al. uBIQuITIN-sPECIFIC PROTEAsE 26 is required for seed development and the repression of PHERES1 in Arabidopsis. Genetics 180, 229-236 (2008).
49. Hatfield, P. M., Gosink, M. M., Carpenter, T. B. & Vierstra, R. D. The ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1) gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 11, 213-226(1997).
50. Jin, J. et al. systematic analysis and nomenclature of mammalian F-box proteins. Genes Dev. 18, 2573-2580(2004).
51. Vierstra, R. D. The ubiquitin/26s proteasome pathway, the complex last chapter in the life of many plant proteins. Trends Plant Sci. 8, 135-142 (2003).
52. schubert, u. et al. Rapid degradation of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins by proteasomes. Nature 404, 770-774 (2000).
53. Bowers, J. E., Chapman, B. A., Rong, J. & Paterson, A. H. unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422, 433-438 (2003).
54. Simillion, C., Vandepoele, K., Van Montagu, M. C., Zabeau, M. & Van de Peer, Y. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13627-13632(2002).
55. Clark, R. M. et al.Common sequence polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 317, 338-342 (2007).
56. Szemenyei, H., Hannon, M. & Long, J. A. TOPLEss mediates auxin-dependent transcriptional repression during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Science 319, 1384-1386(2008).
57. Kepinski, s. & Leyser, O. The ArabidopsisF-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435, 446-451 (2005).
58. Dharmasiri, N. et al.Plant development is regulated by a family of auxin receptor F box proteins. Dev. Cell 9, 109-119(2005).
59. Dharmasiri, N., Dharmasiri, s. & Estelle, M. The F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435, 441-445(2005).
60. Tan,X. et al. Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nature 446, 640-645 (2007).
61. Hayashi, K. et al.small-molecule agonists and antagonists of F-box protein-substrate interactions in auxin perception and signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5632-5637 (2008).
62. Xie, D. X., Feys, B. F., James, s., Nieto-Rostro, M. & Turner, J. G. COI1: an Arabidopsis gene required for jasmonate-regulated defense and fertility. Science 280, 1091-1094(1998).
63. col11 complex during jasmonate signalling. Nature 448, 661-665 (2007).
64. Chini, A. et al. The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature 448, 666-671 (2007).
65. Katsir, L, Schilmiller, A. L., staswick, P. E., He, s. Y. & Howe, G. A. COI1 is a critical component of a receptor for jasmonate and the bacterial virulence factor coronatine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 7100-7105(2008).
66. Willige, B. C. et al.The DELLA domain of GA INsENsITIVE mediates the interaction with the GA INsENsITIVE DWARF1A gibberellin receptor of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 1209-1220 (2007).
67. Ueguchi-Tanaka, M. et al. Molecular interactions of a soluble gibberellin receptor, GID1, with a rice DELLA protein, sLR1, and gibberellin. Plant Cell 19, 2140-2155(2007).
68. Shimada, A. et al.structural basis for gibberellin recognition by its receptor GID1. Nature 456, 520-523 (2008).
69. Murase, K., Hirano, Y., sun, T. P. & Hakoshima, T. Gibberellin-induced DELLA recognition by the gibberellin receptor GID1. Nature 456, 459-463 (2008).
70. Joo, s., Liu, Y., Lueth, A. & Zhang, s. MAPK phosphorylation-induced stabilization of ACs6 protein is mediated by the non-catalytic C-terminal domain, which also contains the cis-determinant for rapid degradation by the 26s proteasome pathway. Plant J. 54, 129-140 (2008).
71. Yoshida, H. et al. The ACCsynthase TOE sequence is required for interaction with ETO1 family proteins and destabilization of target proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. 62, 427-437 (2006).
72. Chae, H. s., Faure, F. & Kieber, J. J. The eto 1, eto2, and eto3 mutations and cytokinin treatment increase ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsisby increasing the stability of ACs protein. Plant Cell 15, 545-559 (2003).
73. Wang, K. L., Yoshida, H., Lurin, C. & Ecker, J. R. Regulation of ethylene gas biosynthesis by the ArabidopsisETO1 protein. Nature 428, 945-950 (2004).
74. Christians, M. J. et al. The BTB ubiquitin ligases ETO1, EOL1 and EOL2 act collectively to regulate ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidosis by controlling type-2 ACC synthase levels. Plant J. 57, 332-345 (2009).
75. Chen, Y. F. et al. Ligand-induced degradation of the ethylene receptor ETR2 through a proteasome-dependent pathway in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 24752-24758 (2007).
76. Qiao, H., Chang, K. N.,Yazaki, J. & Ecker, J. R. Interplay between ethylene, ETP1/ETP2 F-Box proteins, and degradation of EIN2 triggers ethylene responses in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 23, 512-521 (2009).
77. Binder, B. M. et al. The Arabidopsis EIN3 binding F-Box proteins EBF1 and EBF2 have distinct but overlapping roles in ethylene signaling. Plant Cell 19, 509-523 (2007).
78. Gagne, J. M. et al. Arabidopsis EIN3-binding F-BOX 1 and 2 form ubiquitin-protein ligases that repress ethylene action and promote growth by directing EIN3 degradation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101,6803-6808(2004).
79. EBF1-EBF-2-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell 115, 667-677 (2003).
80. Potuschak, T. et al. EIN3-dependent regulation of plant ethylene hormone signaling by two ArabidopsisF box proteins: EBF1 and EBF2. Cell 115, 679-689 (2003).
81. Yanagisawa, s., Yoo, s. D. & sheen, J. Differential regulation of EIN3 stability by glucose and ethylene signalling in plants. Nature 425, 521-525 (2003).
82. 4 signalling. Nature 451, 789-795 (2008).
83. Potushak, T. et al.The exonuclease XRN4 is a component of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18, 3047-3057 (2006).
84. Konishi, M. & Yanagisawa, s. Ethylene signaling in Arabidopsisinvolves feedback regulation via the elaborate control of EBF2 expression by EIN3. Plant J. 55,821-831 (2008).
85. Olmedo, G. et al. ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE5 encodes a 5'→3' exoribonuclease required for regulation of the EIN3-targeting F-box proteins EBF1/2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13286-13293 (2006).
86. Stirnberg, P., Furner, I. J. & Ottoline Leyser, H. M. MAX2 participates in an sCF complex which acts locally at the node to suppress shoot branching. Plant J. 50, 80-94 (2007).
87. Gomez-Roldan, V. et al.strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching. Nature455, 189-194 (2008).
88. umehara, M. et al.Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones. Nature 455, 195-200(2008).
89. Zhang, X., Garreton, V. & Chua, N. H. The AIP2 E3 ligase acts as a novel negative regulator of ABA signaling by promoting ABI3 degradation. Genes Dev. 19,1532-1543(2005).
90. Qin, F. et al. Arabidopsis DREB2A-interacting proteins function as RING E3 ligases and negatively regulate plant drought stress-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 20, 1693-1707 (2008).
91. Disch, s. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase BIG BROTHER controls Arabidopsisorgan size in a dosage-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 16, 272-279 (2006).
92. Li, Y., Zheng, L., Corke, F., smith, C. & Bevan, M. W. Control of final seed and organ size by the DA1 gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 22, 1331-1336(2008).
93. FBL17 degradation of cell cycle inhibitors. Nature 455, 1134-1137(2008).
94. McKim, s.M. et al. The BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes are essential for abscission zone formation in Arabidopsis. Development 135, 1537-1546 (2008).
95. Hepworth, S. R., Klenz, J. E. & Haughn, G. W. uFO in the Arabidopsisinflorescence apex is required for floral-meristem identity and bract suppression. Planta 223, 769-778 (2006).
96. Stirnberg, P., van De sande, K. & Leyser, H. M. MAX1 and MAX2 control shoot lateral branching in Arabidopsis. Development 129, 1131-1141 (2002).
97. Schwager, K. M. et al. Characterization of the VIER F-BOX PROTEINE genes from Arabidopsisreveals their importance for plant growth and development. Plant Cell 19, 1163-1178 (2007).
98. Yin, X. J. et al. ubiquitin lysine 63 chain forming ligases regulate apical dominance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell1 19, 1898-1911 (2007).
99. Hoecker, u. Regulated proteolysis in light signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 469-476 (2005).
100. Clough, R. C. et al. sequences within both the N- and C-terminal domains of phytochrome A are required for PFR ubiquitination and degradation. Plant J. 17, 155-167 (1999).
101. Yu, X. et al. Arabidopsiscryptochrome 2 completes its posttranslational life cycle in the nucleus. Plant Cell 19, 3146-3156(2007).
102. Al-sady, B., Ni, W., Kircher, s., schafer, E. & Quail, P. H. Photoactivated phytochrome induces rapid PIF3 phosphorylation prior to proteasome-mediated degradation. Mol. Cell 23, 439-446 (2006).
103. Osterlund, M. T., Hardtke, C. s., Wei, N. & Deng, X. W. Targeted destabilization of HY5 during light-regulated development of Arabidopsis. Nature 405, 462-466 (2000).
104. Jang, s. et al. ArabidopsisCOP1 shapes the temporal pattern of CO accumulation conferring a photoperiodic flowering response. EMBOJ. 27, 1277-1288(2008).
105. Mas, P., Kim, W. Y., somers, D. E. & Kay, s. A. Targeted degradation of TOC1 by ZTL modulates circadian function in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 426, 567-570 (2003).
106. sawa, M., Nusinow, D. A., Kay, s. A. & Imaizumi, T. FKF1 and GIGANTEA complex formation is required for day-length measurement in Arabidopsis. Science 318,261-265(2007).
107. Imaizumi, T, Schultz, T. F., Harmon, F. G., Ho, L. A. & Kay, s. A. FKF1 F-box protein mediates cyclic degradation of a repressor of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis. Science 309, 293-297 (2005).
108. Kim, W. Y. et al.ZEITLuPE is a circadian photoreceptor stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light. Nature 449, 356-360 (2007).
109. Jones, J. D. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323-329 (2006).
110. Azevedo, C. et al.The RAR1 interactorsGT1,an essential component of R gene-triggered disease resistance. Science 295, 2073-2076 (2002).
111. Austin, M.J. et al. Regulatory role of SGT1 in early R gene-mediated plant defenses. Science 295, 2077-2080 (2002).
112. Gonzalez-Lamothe, R. et al. The u-box protein CMPG1 is required for efficient activation of defense mechanisms triggered by multiple resistance genes in tobacco and tomato. Plant Cell 18, 1067-1083 (2006).
113. Trujillo, M., Ichimura, K., Casais, C. & shirasu, K. Negative regulation of PAMP-triggered immunity by an E3 ubiquitin ligase triplet in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 18, 1396-1401 (2008).
114. Tada, Y. et al. Plant immunity requires conformational charges of NPR1 via s-nitrosylation and thioredoxins. Science 321, 952-956 (2008).
115. Janjusevic, R., Abramovitch, R. B., Martin, G. B. & stebbins, C. E. A bacterial inhibitor of host programmed cell death defenses is an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Science 311, 222-226 (2006).
116. Rosebrock, T. R. et al. A bacterial E3 ubiquitin ligase targets a host protein kinase to disrupt plant immunity. Nature 448, 370-374 (2007).
117. Bortolamiol, D., Pazhouhandeh, M., Marrocco, K., Genschik, P. & Ziegler-Graff, V. The polerovirus F box protein P0 targets ARGONAuTE1 to suppress RNA silencing. Curr. Biol. 17, 1615-1621 (2007).
118. Baumberger, N., Tsai, C. H., Lie, M., Havecker, E. & Baulcombe, D. C. The polerovirus silencing suppressor P0 targets ARGONAuTE proteins for degradation. Curr. Biol. 17, 1609-1614 (2007).
119. Angot, A. et al. Ralstonia solanacearum requires F-box-like domain-containing type III effectors to promote disease on several host plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14620-14625 (2006).
120. Tzfira, T., Vaidya, M. & Citovsky, V. Involvement of targeted proteolysis in plant genetic transformation by Agrobacterium. Nature 431, 87-92 (2004).
121. Stone, S. L., Anderson, E. M., Mullen, R. T. & Goring, D. R. ARC1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and promotes the ubiquitination of proteins during the rejection of self-incompatible Brassica pollen. Plant Cell 15, 885-898 (2003).
122. Samuel, M. A. et al. Interactions between the s-domain receptor kinases and AtPuB-ARM E3 ubiquitin ligases suggest a conserved signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 147, 2084-2095 (2008).
123. Sijacic, P. et al. Identification of the pollen determinant of s-RNase-mediated self-incompatibility. Nature 429, 302-305 (2004).
124. Huang, J., Zhao, L., Yang, Q. & Xue, Y. AhssK1, a novel sKP1 -like protein that interacts with the s-locus F-Box protein sLF. Plant J. 46, 780-793 (2006).
125. Hua, Z. & Kao, T. H. Identification and characterization of components of a putative petunia S-locus F-box-containing E3 ligase complex involved in s-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Plant Cell 18, 2531-2553(2006).
126. Hua, Z., Meng, X. & Kao, T. H. Comparison of Petunia inflata S-locus F-box protein (Pi sLF) with Pi sLF like proteins reveals its unique function in s-RNase based self-incompatibility. Plant Cell 19, 3593-3609 (2007).
127. Weake, V. M. & Workman, J. L. Histone ubiquitination: triggering gene activity. Mol. Cell 29, 653-663 (2008).
128. Fleury, D. et al. The Arabidopsis thaliana homolog of yeast BRE1 has a function in cell cycle regulation during early leaf and root growth. Plant Cell 19, 417-432(2007).
129. Liu, Y., Koornneef, M. & soppe, W. J. The absence of histone H2B monoubiquitination in the Arabidopsis hub 1 (rdo4) mutant reveals a role for chromatin remodeling in seed dormancy. Plant Cell 19, 433-444 (2007).
130. Kraft, E., Bostick, M., Jacobsen, s. E. & Callis, J. ORTH/VIM proteins that regulate DNA methylation are functional ubiquitin E3 ligases. Plant J. 56, 704-715(2008).
131. Peng, J. et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nature Biotech. 21, 921-926 (2003).
132. Kirkpatrick, D. s., Weldon, s. F., Tsaprailis, G., Liebler, D. C. & Gandolfi, A. J. Proteomic identification of ubiquitinated proteins from human cells expressing His-tagged ubiquitin. Proteomics 5, 2104-2111 (2005).
133. Matsumoto, M. et al. Large-scale analysis of the human ubiquitin-related proteome. Proteomics 5, 4145-4151 (2005).
134. Mayor, T., Graumann, J., Bryan, J., MacCoss, M.J. & Deshaies, R. J. Quantitative profiling of ubiquitylated proteins reveals proteasome substrates and the substrate repertoire influenced by the Rpn 10 receptor pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6,1885-1895 (2007).
135. Hitchcock, A. L., Auld, K., Gygi, s. P. & silver, P. A. A subset of membrane-associated proteins is ubiquitinated in response to mutations in the endoplasmic reticulum degradation machinery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12735-12740 (2003).
136. Maor, R. et al. Multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) analysis of ubiquitinated proteins in plants. Mol. Cell Proteomics 6, 601 -610 (2007).
137. saracco, s. A. et al. Tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometric analysis of ubiquitylated proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 9 Mar 2009 (doi: 10.1111 /j. 1365-313×.2009.03862.×).
138. Ding, X. et al. A rice kinase-protein interaction map. Plant Physiol. 149, 1478-1492 (2009).
139. Vijay-Kumar, s. et al.Comparison of the three-dimensional structures of human, yeast, and oat ubiquitin. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 6396-6399 (1987).