Separate influences in learning: Evidence from artificial grammar learning with traumatic brain injury patients

Brain Research

Volumn 1275, Issue , 2009, Pages 67-72

  Pothos, Emmanuel M ^a   Wood, Rodger L ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AGL; Categorization; COVIS; Learning; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL GRAMMAR LEARNING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LEARNING; MALE; PREDICTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349229382     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.019     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ashby G.F., Alfonso-Reese L.A., Turken A.U., and Waldron E.M. A Neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychol. Rev. 105 (1998) 442-481
2. Baddeley A.D. Fractionating the central executive. In D.T. Stuss and R. T. Knight (Eds.) Principles of Frontal Lobe Function (2002), Oxford University Press, New York
3. Baddeley A.D., and Della Sala S. Dual-task performance in dysexecutive and nondysexecutive patients with a frontal lesion. Neuropsychology 11 (1997) 187-194
4. Bailey T.M., and Pothos E.M. AGL StimSelect: software for automated selection of stimuli for artificial grammar learning. Behav. Res. Methods 40 (2008) 164-176
5. Banich, M.T., (in press). Executive function: the search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Science.
6. Banich M.T., Milham M.P., Atchley R., Cohen N.J., Webb A., Wszalek T., Kramer A.F., Liang Z., Wright A., Shenker J., and Magin R. fMRI studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12 (2000) 988-1000
7. Berry D.C., and Dienes Z. Implicit Learning: Theoretical and Empirical Issues (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, England
8. Bigler E.D. The lesion(s) in traumatic brain injury: implications for clinical neuropsychology. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 16 (2001) 95-131
9. Burgess P.W. Strategy application disorder: the role of the frontal lobes in human multitasking. Psychol. Res. 63 (2000) 279-288
10. Chang G.Y., and Knowlton B.J. The effect of surface feature manipulations on artificial grammar learning. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30 (2004) 714-722
11. Conway C.M., and Christiansen M.H. Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus specific representations. Psychol. Sci. 17 (2006) 905-912
12. Dienes Z., and Perner J. A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behav. Brain Sci. 22 (1999) 735-808
13. Dulany D.E., Carlson R.A., and Dewey G.I. A case of syntactical learning and judgment: how conscious and how abstract?. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113 (1984) 541-555
14. Fletcher P., Buechel C., Josephs O., Friston K., and Dolan R. Learning-related neuronal responses in prefrontal cortex studied with functional neuroimaging. Cereb. Cortex 9 (1999) 168-178
15. Friederici A.D., Bahlmann J., Heim S., Schubotz R.J., and Anwander A. The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: functional localization and structural connectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103 (2006) 2458-2463
16. Gomez R.L. Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychol. Sci. 13 (2002) 431-436
17. Johnstone T., and Shanks D.R. Two mechanisms in implicit grammar learning? Comment on Meulemans and Van der Linden (1997). J. Exper. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25 (1999) 524-531
18. Knowlton B.J., and Squire L.R. The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20 (1994) 79-91
19. Knowlton B.J., and Squire L.R. Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn. Mem. Cogn. 22 (1996) 169-181
20. Lieberman M.D., Chang G.Y., Chiao J., Bookheimer S.Y., and Knowlton B.J. An event-related fMRI study of artificial grammar learning in a balanced chunk strength design. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 427-438
21. Mathews R.C., Buss R.R., Stanley W.B., Blanchard-Fields F., Cho J.R., and Druhan B. Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: a synergistic effect. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15 (1989) 1083-1100
22. Minda J.P., Desroches A.S., and Church B.A. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34 (2008) 1518-1533
23. Nosofsky R.M., and Kruschke J.K. Single-system models and interference in category learning: commentary on Waldron and Ashby (2001). Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9 (2002) 169-174
24. Op de Beeck H., Torfs K., and Wagemans J. Perceived shape similarity among unfamiliar objects and the organization of the human object vision pathway. J. Neurosci. 28 (2008) 10111-10123
25. Opitz B., and Friederici A.D. Interactions of the hippocampal system and the prefrontal cortex in learning language-like rules. NeuroImage 19 (2003) 1730-1737
26. Opitz B., and Friederici A.D. Brain correlates of language learning: the neuronal dissociation of rule-based versus similarity-based learning. J. Neurosci. 24 (2004) 8436-8440
27. Pothos E.M. The rules versus similarity distinction. Behav. Brain Sci. 28 (2005) 1-49
28. Pothos E.M. Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychol. Bull. 133 (2007) 227-244
29. Pothos E.M., and Bailey T.M. The importance of similarity in artificial grammar learning. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26 (2000) 847-862
30. Pothos E.M., Chater N., and Ziori E. Does stimulus appearance affect learning?. Am. J. Psychol. 119 (2006) 277-301
31. Reber A.S. Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge (1993), Oxford University Press, New York
32. Reber A.R., and Allen R. Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: a functional interpretation. Cognition 6 (1978) 189-221
33. Redington F.M., and Chater N. Transfer in artificial grammar learning: methodological issues and theoretical implications. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125 (1996) 123-138
34. Skosnik P.D., Mirza F., Gitelman D.R., Parrish T.B., Mesulam M.M., and Reber P.J. Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 1306-1314
35. Sloman S.A., and Rips L.J. Similarity as an explanatory construct. Cognition 65 (1998) 87-101
36. Smith J.G., and McDowall J. The implicit sequence learning deficit in patients with Parkinson's disease: a matter of impaired sequence integration?. Neuropsychologia 44 (2005) 275-288
37. Smith J., and McDowall J. When artificial grammar acquisition in Parkinson's disease is impaired: the case of learning via trial-by-trial feedback. Brain Res. 1067 (2006) 216-228
38. Stanton R.D., and Nosofsky R.M. Feedback interference and dissociations of classification: evidence against the multiple-learning-systems hypothesis. Mem. Cogn. 35 (2007) 1747-1758
39. Taber K.H., Warden D.L., and Hurley R.A. Blast-related traumatic brain injury: what is known?. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 18 (2006) 141-145
40. Tunney R.J., and Altmann G.T.M. Two models of transfer in artificial grammar learning. J. Exper. Psychol., Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27 (2001) 614-639
41. Tunney R.J., and Shanks D.R. Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition. Mem. Cogn. 31 (2003) 1060-1071
42. Zeithamova D., and Maddox W.T. Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning. Mem. Cogn. 34 (2006) 387-398
43. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (1998), The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX
44. Wechsler D. The Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (2001), The Psychological Corporation, England
45. Wilson, B.A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P., Emslie, H., Evans, J.,1996. Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk: Thames Valley Test Company.
46. Wood R.L. Understanding neurobehavioural disability. In: Wood R.L., and McMillan T. (Eds). Neurobehavioural Disability & Social Handicap, after Head Injury (2001), Psychology Press, London