Visual feature learning in artificial grammar classification

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 714-722

  Chang, Grace Y ^a   Knowlton, Barbara J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VISION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 2442420932     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.714     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abrams, M., & Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning: Robustness in the face of psychiatric disorders. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 425-439.
2. Altmann, G., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 899-912.
3. Baddeley, A., Emslie, H., Kolodny, J., & Duncan, J. (1998). Random generation and the executive control of working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 51, 819-852.
4. Buchner, A. (1994). Indirect effects of synthetic grammar learning in an identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 550-566.
5. Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., & Gao, S.-J. (1999). Mapping across domains without feedback: A neural network model of transfer of implicit knowledge. Cognitive Science, 23, 53-82.
6. Dienes, Z., Broadbent, D., & Berry, D. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 875-887.
7. Dulany, D. E., Carlson, R. A., & Dewey, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
8. Gibson, J. M., Brooks, J. O., Friedman, L., & Yesavage, J. A. (1993). Typography manipulations can affect priming of word stem completion in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 481-489.
9. Gomez, R. L. (1997). Transfer and complexity in artificial grammar learning. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 154-207.
10. Gomez, R. L., Gerken, L., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (2000). The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition, 28, 253-263.
11. Gomez, R. L., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1994). What is learned from artificial grammars? Transfer tests of simple association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 396-410.
12. Graf, P., & Ryan, L. (1990). Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 978-992.
13. Higham, P. A. (1997a). Chunks are not enough: The insufficiency of feature frequency-based explanations of artificial grammar learning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 126-137.
14. Higham, P. A. (1997b). Dissociations of grammaticality and specific similarity effects in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1029-1045.
15. Knowlton, B. J., Ramus, S. J., & Squire, L. R. (1992). Intact artificial grammar learning in amnesia: Dissociation of classification learning and explicit memory for specific instances. Psychological Science, 3(3), 172-179.
16. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 79-91.
17. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 169-181.
18. Lieberman, M. D., Chang, G. Y., Chiao, J., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Knowlton, B. J. (in press). An event-related fMRI study of artificial grammar learning in a balanced chunk design. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
19. Meulemans, T., & Van der Linden, M. (1997). Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1007-1028.
20. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
21. Raven, J. C. (1941). Standardization of progressive matrices, 1938. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 19, 137-150.
22. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammar. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
23. Reber, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 115-119.
24. Reber, P. J., & Squire, L. R. (1999). Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's Disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 235-242.
25. Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123-138.
26. Roediger, H. L., & Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion. Memory & Cognition, 15, 379-388.
27. Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). On the relations among priming, conscious recollection, and intentional retrieval: Evidence from neuroimaging research. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 70, 284-303.
28. Seger, C. A. (1997). Two forms of sequential implicit learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 108-131.
29. Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592-608.
30. Shanks, D. R., Johnstone, T., & Staggs, L. (1997). Abstraction processes in artificial grammar learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50, 216-252.
31. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
32. Skosnik, P. D., Mirza, F., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., Mesulam, M.-M., & Reber, P. J. (2002). Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning. NeuroImage, 17, 1306-1314.
33. Tunney, R., & Altmann, T. M. (2001). Two modes of artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 614-639.
34. Vokey, J. R., & Brooks, L. R. (1992). The salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 328-344.
35. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Dorken, M. D. (1993). Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 227-248.