Scanning probe recognition microscopy investigation of tissue scaffold properties

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 651-661

  Fan, Yuan ^a   Chen, Qian ^a   Ayres, Virginia M ^a   Baczewski, Andrew D ^a   Udpa, Lalita ^a   Kumar, Shiva ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Image processing; Regenerative medicine; Scanning probe recognition microscopy; Tissue engineering; Tissue scaffold

Indexed keywords

CARBON NANOTUBE; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NANOFIBER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELASTICITY; ELECTRON DIFFRACTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY; SCANNING PROBE RECOGNITION MICROSCOPY; SCANNING TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ELASTICITY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HARDNESS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, SCANNING PROBE; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOTUBES, CARBON; PARTICLE SIZE;

EID: 67349223035     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. A-Hassan E, Heinz WF, Antonik MD, et al. 1998. Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J, 74:1564-78.
2. Ahmed I, Liu H-Y, Mamiya PC, et al. 2006. Three-dimensional nanofibrillar surfaces covalently modified with tenascin-C-derived peptides enhance neuronal growth in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 76A:851-60.
3. Micoulet A, Spatz JP, Ott A. 2005. Mechanical response analysis and power generation by single-cell stretching. Chem Phys Chem, 6:663-70.
4. Andrea A, Paolo F. 2005. AFM: a versatile tool in biophysics. Measurement Science and Technology, 16:R65-92.
5. Arnold M, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Glass R, et al. 2004. Activation of integrin function by nanopattemed adhesive interfaces. Chem Phys Chem, 5:383-8.
6. Atala A. 2005. Technology insight: applications of tissue engineering and biological substitutes in urology. Nat Clin Pract Urol, 2:143-9.
7. Bear JE, Svitkina TM, Krause M, et al. 2002. Antagonism between Ena/VASP proteins and actin filament capping regulates fibroblast motility. Cell, 109:509-21.
8. Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C. 1986. Atomic force microscope. Physical Review Letters, 56:930.
9. Biyasheva A, Svitkina T, Kunda P, et al. 2004. Cascade pathway of filopodia formation downstream of SCAR. J Cell Sci, 117:837-48.
10. Bonnell DA. 2001. Scanning probe microscopy and spectroscopy: theory, techniques, and applications, New York: Wiley-VCH.
11. Braga PC, Ricci D. 2003. Atomic force microscopy: biomedical methods and applications. New Jersey: Humana Press.
12. Butt H-J, Cappella B, Kappl M. 2005. Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: Technique, interpretation and applications. Surface Science Reports, 59:1-152.
13. Cappelta B, Dietler G. 1999. Force-distance curves by atomic force microscopy. Surface Science Reports, 34:1-104.
14. Chung HY, Hall JRB, Gogins MA, et al. 2004. Polymer, polymer microfiber, polymer nanofiber and applications including filter structures. United States Patent No. 6743 273, Donaldson Company, Inc.
15. Deligianni DD, Katsala ND, Koutsoukos PG, et al. 2001. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials, 22:87-96.
16. Digital. Instruments 2003. Chapter 14.6. Command reference manual. p. 381-400.
17. Discher DE, Jamney P, Wang Y-I. 2005. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science, 310:1139-43.
18. Dzenis Y. 2004. Spinning continuous fibers for nanotechnology. Science, 304:1917-19.
19. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, et al. 2004. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J, 86:617-28.
20. Engler AJ, Richert L, Wong JY, et al. 2004. Surface probe measurements of the elasticity of sectioned tissue, thin gels and polyelectrolyte multilayer films: Correlations between substrate stiffness and cell adhesion. Surface Science, 570:142-54.
21. Fan Y, Chen Q, Ayres VM, et al. 2005. Scanning probe recognition microscopy investigation of cell elastic properties. 2005 APS March Meeting. Los Angeles, CA.
22. Gaudet C, Marganski WA, Kim S, et al. 2003. Influence of type I collagen surface density on fibroblast spreading, motility, and contractility. Biophys J, 85:3329-35.
23. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. 2002. Digital image processing, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24. Guo W-H, Frey MT, Burnham NA, et al. 2006. Substrate rigidity regulates the formation and maintenance of tissues. Biophys J, 90:2213-20.
25. Gupta R, Geisberger A, Hughes G, et al. 2006. Manipulation of collagen for mechanical characterization. Zyvex Corporation.
26. Hertz H. 1881. Uber den Kontakt elastischer Köper. J Reine Angew Mathematik, 92:156.
27. Hoh JH, Heinz WF, A-Hassan E. 1997. Force Volume. Support Note No. 240. Digital Instruments.
28. Hu JC, Athanasiou KA. 2006. A self-assembling process in articular cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng, 12:969-79.
29. Kasa I. 1976. A curve fitting procedure and its error analysis. IEEE Trans Inst Meas, 25:8-14.
30. Keller D. 1991. Reconstruction of STM and AFM images distorted by finite-size tips. Surface Science, 253:353-64.
31. Lo C-M, Wang H-B, Dembo M, et al. 2000. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J, 79:144-52.
32. Lampin M, Warocquier-Clérout R, Legris C, et al. 1997. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 36:99-108.
33. Murray JD. 2003. Chapter 4. Mathematical biology II: spatial models and biomedical applications. 3rd ed. New York: Springer. p. 192-248.
34. Pelham RJ Jr, Wang Y-I. 1997. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. PNAS, 94:13661-5.
35. Stevens MM, George JH. 2005. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science, 310:1135-8.
36. Svitkina TM, Borisy GG. 1999. Arp2/3 Complex and actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin in dendritic organization and treadmilling of actin filament array in lamellipodia. J Cell Biol, 145:1009-26.
37. Svitkina TM, Bulanova EA, Chaga OY, et al. 2003. Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network. J Cell Biol, 160:409-21.
38. Svitkina TM, Verkhovsky AB, Borisy GG. 1996. Plectin sidearms mediate interaction of intermediate filaments with microtubules and other components of the cytoskeleton. J Cell Biol, 135:991-1007.
39. Svitkina TM, Verkhovsky AB, McQuade KM, et al. 1997. Analysis of the actin-myosin II system in fish epidermal keratocytes: mechanism of cell body translocation. J Cell Biol, 139:397-415.
40. Taylor G. 1969. Electrically driven jets. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 313:453-75.
41. Udpa L, Ayres VM, Yuan F, et al. 2006. Deconvolution of atomic force microscopy data for cellular and molecular imaging. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 23:73-83.
42. Vignjevic D, Yarar D, Welch MD, et al. 2003. Formation of filopodia-like bundles in vitro from a dendritic network. J Cell Biol, 160:951-62.
43. Villarrubia JS. 1994. Morphological estimation of tip geometry for scanned probe microscopy. Surface Science, 321:287-300.
44. Villarrubia JS. 1997. Algorithms for scanned probe microscope image simulation, surface reconstruction, and tip estimation. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 102:425-54.
45. Xu M, Kreeger PK, Shea LD, et al. 2006. Tissue-engineered follicles produce live, fertile offspring. Tissue Eng, 12:2739-46.