Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 11699-11709

  Seçme, Neşe Yalçin ^a   Bayrakdaroǧlu, Ali ^a   Kahraman, Cengiz ^b  

^a NEVSEHIR HACI BEKTAS VELI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

AHP; Fuzzy; Multi criteria decision making; Performance evaluation; TOPSIS; Turkish Banking Sector

Indexed keywords

AHP; FUZZY; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; TOPSIS; TURKISH BANKING SECTOR;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; FINANCE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 67349187398     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.013     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Albayrak, E., & Erensal, Y. C. (2005). A study bank selection decision in Turkey using the extended fuzzy AHP method. In 35th International conference on computers and industrial engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.
2. Aldlaigan A., and Buttle F.A. SYSTRA-SQ: A new measure of bank service quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management 13 (2002) 38-362
3. Bauer P.W., Berger A.N., Ferrier G.D., and Humphrey D.B. Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: A comparison of frontier efficiency methods. Journal of Economic and Business 50 2 (1998) 85-114
4. Beccalli A. Does IT investment improve bank performance? Evidence from Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance 31 (2007) 2205-2230
5. Benitez J.M., Martin J.C., and Roman C. Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry. Tourism Management 28 2 (2007) 544-555
6. Bozbura F.T., Beskse A., and Kahraman C. Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications 32 4 (2007) 1100-1112
7. Buckley J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17 (1985) 233-247
8. Büyüközkan G. Multi-criteria decision making for e-marketplace selection. Internet Research: Electronic networking Applications and Policy 14 2 (2004) 139-154
9. Chan F.T.S., Chan M.H., and Tang N.K.H. Evaluation methodologies for technology selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 107 (2000) 330-337
10. Chang D.-Y. Extent analysis and synthetic decision. Optimization Techniques and Applications 1 (1992) 352
11. Chang D.Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 95 3 (1996) 649-655
12. Cheng C.H. Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research 96 2 (1997) 343-350
13. Cheng C.H., Yang K.L., and Hwang C.L. Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight. European Journal of Operational Research 16 2 (1999) 423-435
14. Demirgüç-Kunt A., and Huizinga H. Determinants of commercial bank interest margins and profitability: Some international evidence. The World Bank Economic Review 13 (1999) 379-408
15. Deng H. Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 21 3 (1999) 215-231
16. Denizer, C., Dinç, M., & Tari{dotless}mci{dotless}lar, M. (2000). Measuring bank efficiency in the pre and post liberatlization environment: Evidence from the Turkish banking system. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2476.
17. Demir Y., and Astarci{dotless}oǧlu M. Determining bank performance via financial prediction: An application in ISE. Süleyman Demirel University. Journal of Business Administration and Economics Faculty 12 1 (2007) 273-292
18. Ertuǧrul I., and Karakaşoǧlu N. Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications 36 1 (2009) 702-715
19. Frei F.X., and Harker P.T. Measuring aggregate process performance using AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 116 (1999) 436-442
20. Güven S., and Persentili E. A linear programming model for bank balance-sheet management. Omega 25 (1997) 449-459
21. Herrera F., and Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic decision analysis steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 115 1 (2000) 67-82
22. Hopkins W.E., and Hopkins A.S. Strategic planning-financial performance relationships in banks: A causal examination. Strategic Management Journal 18 (1997) 635-652
23. Hussain M., and Gunasekaran A. An institutional perspective of non-financial management accounting measures: A review of the financial services industry. Managerial Auditing Journal 17 9 (2002) 518-536
24. Hussain M., Gunasekaran A., and Islam M.M. Implications of non-financial performance measures in Finnish banks. Managerial Auditing Journal 17 8 (2002) 452-463
25. Hwang C.L., and Yoon K. Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications (1981), Springer, Berlin
26. IOMA's Report (2001). Which non-financial performance measures are companies using, IOMA's.
27. IOMA's Report (2002). Time for non-financial performance measures, IOMA's.
28. Işi{dotless}k, I., Uysal, D., & Meleke, U. (2003). Post-entry performance of de novo banks in Turkey. In 10th Annual conference of the ERF. .
29. Ittner C., Lacker D., and Rajan M. The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The Accounting Review 72 2 (1997) 231-255
30. Kahraman C., Cebeci U., and Ruan D. Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics 87 (2004) 171-184
31. Kahraman C., Cebeci U., and Ulukan Z. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management 16 6 (2003) 382-394
32. Kahraman, C., Ulukan, Z., & Tolga, E. (1998). A fuzzy weighted evaluation method using objective and subjective measures. In Proceedings of the international ICSC symposium on engineering of intelligent systems (EIS'98) (Vol. 1, pp. 57-63).
33. Kahraman C., Ruan D., and Doǧan Y. Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection. Information Sciences 157 (2003) 135-153
34. Kulak O., and Kahraman C. Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences 170 (2005) 191-210
35. Kaufmann A., and Gupta M.M. Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic theory and applications (1991), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY
36. Kaya, Y. T. (2001). CAMELS analysis in Turkish banking sector. BRSA MSPD working report 6.
37. Krishnan M.V., Ramaswamy M.M., and Damien P. Customer satisfaction for financial services: The role of products, services, and information technology. Management Science 45 (1999) 1194-1209
38. Lee A.H.I., Chen W.C., and Chang C.J. A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert System with Applications 34 (2008) 96-107
39. Lee H., Kwak W., and Han I. Developing a business performance evaluation system: An analytic hierarchical model. The Engineering Economist 40 (1995) 343-357
40. Lee M., Pham H., and Zhang X. A methodology for priority setting with application to software development process. European Journal of Operational Research 118 (1999) 375-389
41. Leung L.C., and Cao D. On consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 124 (2000) 102-113
42. Li S., Liu F., Liu S., and Whitmore G.A. Comparative performance of Chinese commercial banks, findings and policy implications. Reviews of Quantities Finance and Accounting 16 (2001) 149-170
43. Lin X., and Zhang Y. Bank ownership reform and bank performance in China. Journal of Banking & Finance 33 1 (2009) 20-29
44. Mercan M., Reisman A., Yolalan R., and Emel A.B. The effect of scale and mode of ownership on the financial performance of Turkish banking sector: Result of a DEA-based analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37 (2003) 185-202
45. Neely A. The Performance measurement revaluation: Why now and what next?. International Journal of Operation & Production Management 19 2 (1999) 204-228
46. Oral M., and Yolalan R. An empirical study on measuring operating efficiency and profitability of bank branches. European Journal of Operational Research 46 (1990) 282-294
47. Parkan C., and Wu M. Measurement of the performance of an investment bank using the operational competitiveness rating procedure. Omega 27 (1999) 210-217
48. Parker C. Performance measurement. Work Study 49 2 (2000) 63-66
49. Ravi V., Kurniawan H., Thai P.N.K., and Kumar P.R. Soft computing system for bank performance prediction. Applied Soft Computing 8 (2008) 305-315
50. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
51. Sherman H.D., and Gold F. Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance 9 (1985) 297-315
52. Siskos Y., Zopounidis C., and Pouliezos A. An integrated DSS for financing firms by an industrial development bank in Greece. Decision Support Systems 12 (1994) 151-168
53. Soteriou A.C., and Zenios S.A. Using DEA for Costing Bank products. European Journal of Operational Research 114 2 (1999) 234-248
54. Stam A., Minghe S., and Haines M. Artificial neural network representations for hierarchical preference structures. Computers and Operations Research 23 12 (1996) 1191-1201
55. Suwignjo P., Bittici U.S., and Carrie A.S. Quantative models for performance measurement system (QMPMS). International Journal of Operation Production Management 64 (2000) 231-241
56. Ta H.P., and Har K.Y. A study of bank selection decisions in Singapore using the analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Bank Marketing 18 (2000) 170-180
57. Thanassoulis E., Boussofiane A., and Dyson R.G. A comparison of data envelopment analysis and ratio analysis as tools for performance assessment. Omega 24 (1995) 229-244
58. Thevaranjan, A., Joseph, K., & Srinivasan, D. (1999). Managerial myopia and non-financial measures: The case of customer satisfaction mitigating hard-selling. In Managerial accounting research conference, Orlando.
59. Tözüm H. Performance evaluation of banks. Active: Journal of Banking and Finance 27 (2002) 1-9
60. Van Laarhoven P.J.M., and Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11 (1983) 229-241
61. Vivas A., Pastor J., and Hasan I. European bank performance beyond country borders: What really matter?. Europeran Finance Review 5 (2001) 141-165
62. Wang G., Huang S., and Dismukes J. Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 91 (2004) 1-15
63. Wang L., Chu J., and Wu J. Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Economics 107 (2007) 151-163
64. Wang T.C., and Chen Y.H. Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. International Journal of Management Science 35 (2007) 384-388
65. Yeh Q.J. The application of data envelopment analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. Journal of The Operational Research Society 47 (1996) 980-988
66. Yurdakul M., and İç Y.T. AHP approach in the credit evaluation of the manufacturing firms in Turkey. International Journal of Production Economics 88 (2004) 269-289
67. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8 (1965) 338-353
68. Zhao R., and Govind R. Algebraic characteristics of extended fuzzy number. Information Science 54 (1991) 103-130
69. Zhu K.J., Jing Y., and Chang D.Y. A discussion of extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 116 (1999) 450-456
70. Zimmermann H.J. Fuzzy set theory and its applications. 2nd ed. (1991), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London
71. Zopounidis C., Pouliezos A., and Yannacopoulo D. Designing adds for the assessment of company performance and viability. Computer Science in Economics and Management 5 (1992) 41-56