Forms of mathematical interaction in different social settings: Examples from students', teachers' and teacher-students' communication about mathematics

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 111-132

  Nührenbörger, Marcus ^a   Steinbring, Heinz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Communication and interaction; Construction of mathematical knowledge; Elementary mathematics teaching; Epistemology; Teachers' reflection

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349111731     PISSN: 13864416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-009-9100-9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barnes, D. (1979). From curriculum to communication. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
2. Bauersfeld, H. (2002). Interaktion und Kommunikation. Verstehen und Verständigung. Grundschule, 36(3), 10-13.
3. Benaceraff, P. (1984). What numbers could not be. In P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam (Eds.), Philosophy of mathematics: Selected readings (pp. 272-294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Benke, G., Hošpesová, A., & Tichá, M. (2008). The use of action research in teacher education. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3): Participants in mathematics teacher education. Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 283-308). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
5. Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2004). Using video in teacher education. Oxford: Elsevier.
6. Crespo, S. (2006). Elementary teacher talk in mathematics study group. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(1), 29-56.
7. Freudenthal, H. (1978). Vorrede zu einer Wissenschaft vom Mathematikunterricht. München: Oldenbourg.
8. Goodwin, Ch., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (studies in the social and cultural foundations of language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Krainer, K. (1998). Dimensions of teacher's professional practice: Action, reflection, autonomy and networking. In T. Breiteig & G. Brekke (Eds.), Theory into practice in mathematics education. Proceedings of Norma 98 the second Nordic conference on mathematics education [Plenary lect.] (pp. 36-44). Kristiansand, Norway: Agder College Research Series No. 13.
10. Krummheuer, G. (2000). Analyses: Interpretative research in primary mathematics education. Some preliminary remarks. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 32(5), 124-125.
11. Maher, C. A. (2008). Video recordings as pedagogical tools in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2): Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 65-83). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
12. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice. The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge Falmer.
13. Nicol, C., & Crespo, S. (2004). Learning to see in mathematics classrooms. In A. Johnsen Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3) (pp. 417-424). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
14. Nührenbörger, M. (2007). "Wir machen das zu zweit" - Gemeinsames Lernen im Fach Mathematik. In K. Burk, H. de Boer, & F. Heinzel (Eds.), Lehren und Lernen in jahrgangsgemischten und entwicklungsheterogenen Klassen. Grundschulverband. Arbeitskreis Grundschule (Band S 57) (pp. 144-159). Hemsbach, Germany: Beltz.
15. Nührenbörger, M., & Pust, S. (2006). Mit Unterschieden rechnen. Lernumgebungen und Materialien im differenzierten Anfangsunterricht Mathematik. Seelze: Kallmeyer.
16. Putnam, R., & Boko, H. (2000). What do new views and knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
17. Scherer, P., Söbbeke, E., & Steinbring, H. (2004). Praxisleitfaden zur kooperativen Reflexion des eigenen Mathematikunterrichts. Germany: Universities of Bielefeld and Dortmund.
18. Scherer, P., & Steinbring, H. (2006). Noticing children's learning processes: Teachers jointly reflect on their own classroom interaction for improving mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 157-185.
19. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflecting practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.
20. Seago, N. (2004). Using videos as an object of inquiry for mathematics teaching and learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 259-286). Oxford: Elsevier.
21. Seago, N. (2008). Mathematics teaching profession. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (Vol. 3): Participants in mathematics teacher education. Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 331-354). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
22. Selter, C. (1995). Entwicklung von Bewusstheit - eine zentrale Aufgabe der Grundschullehrerausbildung. Journal für Mathematikdidaktik, 16(1/2), 115-144.
23. Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183.
24. Steinbring, H. (2005). The construction of new mathematical knowledge in classroom interaction - An epistemological perspective (Vol. 38). Berlin: Springer. (Mathematics Education Library).
25. Steinbring, H. (2006). What makes a sign a mathematical sign? An epistemological perspective on mathematical interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 133-162.
26. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.
27. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Wood, T. (2001). Learning to teach mathematics differently: Reflection matters. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 431-438). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.