MATHEMATICS TEACHING PROFESSION

Participants in Mathematics Teacher Education: Individuals, Teams, Communities and Networks: Volume 3

Volumn 3, Issue , 2008, Pages 331-352

  Seago, Nanette ^a  

^a Science   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84985876466     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 83-104). Westport, CT: Ablex.
2. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In B. Davis & E. Simmt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (Vol. 1, pp. 3-14). Edmonton, CN: CMESG/GCEDM.
3. Ball, D. L., Hill, H., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, Fall, 2005, 1-10.
4. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook ofpolicy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.
6. Borko, H., Frykholm, J., Pittman, M., Eiteljorg, E., Nelson, M., Jacobs, J., Clark, K. K., & Schneider, C. (2005). Preparing teachers to foster algebraic thinking. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik: International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 37(1), 43-52.
7. Borko H., & Shavelson, R. J. (1990). Teachers’ decision making. In B. Jones & L. Idols (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 311-346). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession (1986). A nation prepared. New York: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
8. Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E. (1989). Building on the knowledge of students and teachers. In G. Vergnaud, J. Rogalski, & M. Artigue (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 34-45). Paris: Bicentenaire de la révolution française.
9. Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 13-20.
10. Darling-Hammond, L. (1985). Valuing teachers: The making of a profession. Teachers College Record. 87(2), 205-218.
11. de Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
12. Driscoll, M., Zawojewski, J., Humez, A., Nikula, J., Goldsmith, L., & Hammerman, J. (2001). The fostering algebraic thinking toolkit: A guide for staff development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13. Even, R., Tirosh, D., & Markovits, Z. (1996). Teachers subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Research and development. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 119-134). Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia.
14. Ferrini-Mundy, J., Floden, R., McCrory, R., Burrill, G., & Sandow, D. (2004). A conceptual framework for knowledge for teaching school algebra. Unpublished manuscript. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
15. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689.
16. Goffree, F., & Oonk, W. (2001). Digitizing real teaching practice for teacher education programmes: The MILE approach. In F.-L. Lin & T. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 111-146). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
17. Goldsmith, L. T., Seago, N., Driscoll, M. J., Nikula, J., & Blasi, Z. (2006, April). Turning to the Evidence: Examining the impact of two practice-based professional development programs. Symposium paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA.
18. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.
19. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Heck, D. J. (2003, April). Measuring teacher knowledge in mathematics professional development using embedded assessments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
21. Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California's Mathematics Professional Development Institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 330-351.
22. Hill, H. C, & Collopy, R. (2002). What might teachers learn: An evaluation of the potential opportunities to learn in Videocase. An evaluation report to VCMPD. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
23. Holmes Group (1896). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: Author.
24. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2003). Using student work to support professional development in elementary mathematics. Center for Study of Teaching and Policy: University of Washington.
25. Llinares, S., & Krainer, K. (2006). Mathematics (student) teachers and teacher educators as learners. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 429-459). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
26. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary school mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge Falmer.
28. Markovits, Z., & Even, R. (1994). Teaching situations: Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content. In J. P. Ponte & J. F. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th PME International Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 225-232). Lisbon, Portugal: University of Lisbon.
29. Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1995). Teachers’ mathematical experiences as links to children’s needs. In L. Meira & D. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th PME International Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 312-319). Recife, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
30. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (1988). Institutional mission. Washington, DC: Author.
31. NCTM - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
32. NCTM - National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
33. Noddings, N. (1992). Professionalization and mathematics teaching. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 197-208). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
34. Nussbaum, M. C. (1990). The discernment of perception: An Aristotelian conception of private and public rationality. Love's knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35. Schifter, D., Bastable, V., Russell, S. J., Lester, J. B., Davenport, L. R., Yaffee, L., & Cohen, S. (1999a). Building a system of tens: Facilitator guide. Parsippany, NJ: Dale Seymour.
36. Seago, N., & Goldsmith, L. T. (2006). Learning mathematics for teaching. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp 73-80). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University.
37. Seago, N., Mumme, J., & Branca, N. (2004). Learning and teaching linear functions. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
38. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
39. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 1-22.
40. Shulman, L. S. (1989). The pedagogy of a discipline is the highest stage of learning. The Holmes Group Forum, 3(3), 4-5.
41. Sullivan, P., & Mousley, J. (1998). Conceptualising mathematics teaching: The role of autonomy in stimulating teacher reflection. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 105-112). University of Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch.
42. Zaslavsky, O., Chapman, O., & Leikin, R. (2003). Professional development in mathematics education: Trends and tasks. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 877-915). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.