Would i lie to you? on social preferences and lying aversion

Experimental Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 180-192

  Hurkens, Sjaak ^a   Kartik, Navin ^b,c  

^a Barcelona)   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Deception; Experimental economics; Lying; Social preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 67349091419     PISSN: 13864157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10683-008-9208-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. J. Andreoni J. Miller 2002 Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism Econometrica 70 2 737 753 (Pubitemid 34269067)
2. J. Brandts G. Charness 2000 Hot and cold decisions and reciprocity in experiments with sequential games Experimental Economics 2 3 227 238
3. J. Brandts G. Charness 2003 Truth or consequences: an experiment Management Science 49 116 130
4. Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M. (2005). Deception: the role of guilt. Mimeo. UC Santa Barbara and University of Arizona.
5. G. Charness M. Dufwenberg 2006 Promises and partnership Econometrica 74 6 1579 1601
6. Charness, G., & Dufwenberg, M. (2007). Broken promises: an experiment. Mimeo. UC Santa Barbara and University of Arizona.
7. V. Crawford J. Sobel 1982 Strategic information transmission Econometrica 50 6 1431 1451
8. Ederer, F., & Fehr, E. (2008). Deception and incentives - how Dishonesty undermines effort provision. Mimeo. MIT and University of Zurich.
9. E. Fehr K. M. Schmidt 1999 A Theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 3 817 868
10. Gächter, S., & Renner, E. (2006). The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public good experiments. Discussion Papers 2006-16. The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham, September 2006.
11. U. Gneezy 2005 Deception: the role of consequences American Economic Review 95 1 384 394 (Pubitemid 40801729)
12. Rode, J. (2006). Truth and trust in communication: an experimental study of behavior under asymmetric information. Mimeo. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
13. S. Sánchez-Pagés M. Vorsatz 2007 An experimental study of truth-telling in a sender-receiver game Games and Economic Behavior 61 1 86 112
14. Selten, R. (1967). Die Strategiemethode zur Erforschung des eingeschränkt rationalen Verhaltens im Rahmen eines Oligopolexperiments. In H. Sauermann (Ed.), Beiträge zur experimentellen Wirtschaftsforschung. Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
15. A. Sen 1997 Maximization and the act of choice Econometrica 65 4 745 780 (Pubitemid 127465494)
16. Sutter, M. (2007, forthcoming). Deception through telling the truth?! Experimental evidence from individuals and teams. Economic Journal.
17. Vanberg, C. (2008, forthcoming). Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations. Econometrica. http://www. econometricsociety.org/asp/pdfstreamer.asp?ref=298 .
18. Wang, J. T. Y., Spezio, M., & Camerer, C. F. (2008). Pinocchio's pupil: using eyetracking and pupil dilation to understand truth-telling and deception in sender-receiver games. Mimeo. National Taiwan University and Caltech.