A comparative study of the long term results of root coverage with connective tissue graft or enamel matrix protein: 24-Month results

Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Abolfazli, Nader ^a   Saleh Saber, Fariba ^a   Eskandari, Amir ^a   Lafzi, Ardeshir ^a  

^a TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Connective tissue grafts; Coronally advanced flap; EMD; Gingival recession; Root coverage

Indexed keywords

ENAMEL PROTEIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; ENAMEL; FEMALE; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; MALE; TISSUE GRAFT; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DENTAL ENAMEL PROTEINS; FEMALE; GINGIVAL RECESSION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67149115410     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wennstrom, JL. Proceedings of the 1st European workshop on periodontology. In: Lang, NP, Karring T, editors. Mucogingival surgery. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co; 1994.
2. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:220-225 (Pubitemid 38175570)
3. Källestål C, Uhlin S. Buccal attachment loss in Swedish adolescents. J Clin Periodontol. 1992;19:485-491
4. Sbordone L, Ramaglia L, Spagnuolo G, De Luca M. A comparative study of free gingival and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. Periodontal Case Rep. 1988;10:8-12.
5. Paolantonio M, Di Murro C, Cattabriga A, Cattabriga M. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24:51-56 (Pubitemid 127731491)
6. Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20:51-59
7. Hägewald S, Spahr A, Rompola E, Haller B, Heijl L, Bernimoulin JP. Comparative study of Emdogain and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of human gingival recessions. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29:35-41. (Pubitemid 41697732)
8. Modica F, Del Pizzo M, Roccuzzo M, Romagnoli R. Coronally advanced flap for the treatment of buccal gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study. J Periodontol. 2000;71:1693-1698
9. Berlucchi I, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Weinstein RL. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22:583-593
10. Pilloni A, Paolantonio M, Camargo PM. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation. J Periodontol. 2006;77:2031-2039 (Pubitemid 46002083)
11. Castellanos A, De la Rosa M, De la Garza M, Caffesse RG. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions. J Periodontol. 2006;77:7-14. (Pubitemid 43949651)
12. McGuire MK, Nunn M. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters. J Periodontol. 2003;74:1110-1125 (Pubitemid 37161730)
13. Löe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38:610-616
14. Turesky S, Gilmore ND, Glickman I. Reduced plaque formation by the chloromethyl analogue of victamine C. J Periodontol. 1970;41:41-43
15. Bernimoulin JP, Lüscher B, Mühlemann HR. Coronally repositioned periodontal flap. Clinical evaluation after one year. J Clin Periodontol. 1975;2:1-13.
16. Wennström JL. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol. 1996;1:671-701.
17. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Moses O. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2004;75:600-607 (Pubitemid 38635031)
18. Harris RJ. Root coverage with connective tissue grafts: an evaluation of short- and long-term results. J Periodontol. 2002;73:1054-1059
19. Del Pizzo M, Zucchelli G, Modica F, Villa R, Debernardi C. Coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a 2-year study. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:1181-1187 (Pubitemid 41499477)
20. Moses O, Artzi Z, Sculean A, Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Romanos GE, et al. Comparative study of two root coverage procedures: a 24-month follow-up multicenter study. J Periodontol. 2006;77:195-202. (Pubitemid 44725071)
21. Cattaneo V, Rota C, Silvestri M, Piacentini C, Forlino A, Gallanti A, et al. Effect of enamel matrix derivative on human periodontal fibroblasts: proliferation, morphology and root surface colonization. An in vitro study. J Periodontal Res. 2003;38:568-574 (Pubitemid 37494406)
22. Hägewald S, Spahr A, Rompola E, Haller B, Heijl L, Bernimoulin JP. Comparative study of Emdogain and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of human gingival recessions. A prospective controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29:35-41. (Pubitemid 41697732)
23. Ainamo A, Bergenholtz A, Hugoson A, Ainamo J. Location of the mucogingival junction 18 years after apically repositioned flap surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 1992;19:49-52.