A Comparative Study of Root Coverage Obtained with an Acellular Dermal Matrix Versus a Connective Tissue Graft: Results of 107 Recession Defects in 50 Consecutively Treated Patients

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 51-59

  Harris, Randall J ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL SKIN; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GINGIVA DISEASE; GINGIVOPLASTY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PLASTIC SURGERY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; FEMALE; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GINGIVOPLASTY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 0034139844     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Wennström J. Mucogingival therapy. 1996 World Workshop in Periodontics. Ann Periodontol 1996;1:671-701.
2. Miller PD. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(2):9-13.
3. Harris RJ. The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft, A predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol 1992;63:477-486.
4. Harris RJ. The connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft: The results of 100 consecutively-treated defects. J Periodontol 1994;65:448-461.
5. Harris RJ. A comparison of two techniques of obtaining a connective tissue graft from the palate. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:261-272.
6. Spence J, Cotton J, Underwood B, Duncan C. Elementary Statistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983:145-195.
7. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985;56:715-720.
8. Raetzke PB. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the "envelope" technique. J Periodontol 1985;56: 397-402.
9. Nelson S. The subpedicle connective tissue graft, A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces. J Periodontol 1987;58:95-102.
10. Borghetti A, Louise F. Controlled clinical evaluation of the subpedicle connective tissue graft for the coverage of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1994;65:1107-1112.
11. Allen A. Use of the supraperiosteal envelope in soft tissue grafting for root coverage. II. Clinical results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:302-315.
12. Bouchard P, Etienne D, Ouhayoun J, Nilvéus R. Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study of 2 procedures. J Periodontol 1994;65:929-936.
13. Bouchard P, Nilvéus R, Etienne D. Clinical evaluation of tetracycline HCI conditioning in the treatment of gingival recessions. A comparative study. J Periodontol 1997;68:262-269.
14. Wennström JL, Zucchelli G. Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2 year prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23: 770-777.
15. Harris RJ. A comparison of two root coverage techniques, guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. J Periodontol 1998;69:1426-1434.
16. Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with guided tissue regeneration utilizing a bioabsorbable membrane versus the connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft. J Periodontol 1997;68:779-790.