Longitudinal study of the ECAP measured in children with cochlear implants;Avaliação longitudinal do ECAP registrado em crianças usuárias de implante coclear

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 90-96

  Tanamati, Liege Franzini ^a   Bevilacqua, Maria Cecília ^b   Costa, Orozimbo Alves ^c  

^a Fonoaudióloga   (Brazil)

^b Fonoaudióloga do Curso de Fonoaudiologia ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Child; Cochlear implant; Cochlear nerve

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRODE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

EID: 67049146453     PISSN: 18088694     EISSN: 18088686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30837-5     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, Firszt, JB, Hughes ML, Hong SH, Staller SJ. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M Implant to Record the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential. Ear Hear .1999;20 (1):45-59. (Pubitemid 29072423)
2. a ed. London: Singular Publishing Group, Inc; 1998. p.317-356
3. Simmons FB, Lusted HS, Meyers T, Shelton C. Electrically induced auditory brainstem response as a clinical tool in estimating nerve survival. Annals Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl .1984;112:97-100. (Pubitemid 14069996)
4. Gordon KA, Ebinger KA, Gilden JE, Shapiro WH. Neural Response Telemetry in 12 to 24 month old children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2002;189:42-48 (Pubitemid 34522302)
5. Shepherd RK, Matsushima J, Martin RL, Clark GM. Cochlear pathology following Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. II deafened kittens. Hear Res. 1994;81(1-2):150-166
6. Shepherd RK, Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological response with cochlear status. Hear Res. 1997;108:112-144
7. Hardie N.A. The consequences of deafness and chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation on the central auditory pathways. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998;25(5):303-309 (Pubitemid 28221636)
8. Hughes ML, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Wolaver AA, Gervais JP. Comparison of EAP Threshold with MAP Levels in the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant: data from children. Ear Hear. 2000;21(2):164-174 (Pubitemid 30194705)
9. Thai Van H, Chanal JM, Coudert C, Veuillet E, Truy E, Collet L. Relationship between NRT measurement and behavioral levels in children with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant may change over time: preliminary report. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol .2001;58:153-162 (Pubitemid 32237222)
10. Ferrari DV. A Telemetria de Respostas Neurais para registrar o potencial de ação composto eletricamente evocado do nervo auditivo em crianças usuárias de Implante Coclear Multicanal. [Dissertação]. São Paulo (SP): universidade de São Paulo; 2003.
11. Lai WK, Akist M, Akdas F, Diller N. Longitudinal behaviour of neural response telemetry (NRT) data and clinical implications. Int J Audiol. 2004;43(5):252-263 (Pubitemid 38902063)
12. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurotol. 2006;11:7-23. (Pubitemid 43087556)
13. Colletti V, Carner M, Miorelli V, Guida M, Colletti L, Fiorino FG. Cochlear implantation at under 12 months: report on 10 patients. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(3):445-449 (Pubitemid 40327990)
14. Brown CJ. Clinical uses of electrically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11:383-387 (Pubitemid 37176011)
15. a. ed. Editora Campus, Rio de Janeiro; 2004. p. 212.
16. Leak PA, Snyder RL. Effects of Chronic Electrical Stimulation in an animal model of neonatal profound hearing loss. Em: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, editores. Advances in Cochlear Implants. International Interscience Seminars. Manz Wien; 1993. p. 50-53
17. Mitchell A, Miller JM, Finger PA, Heller JM, Raphael Y, Altschuler RA. Effects of chronic high-rate stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig. Hear Res .1997;105(1-2):30-43. (Pubitemid 27104533)
18. Dodson HC, Mohuiddin A. Response of spiral ganglion neurones to cochlear hair cell destruction in the guinea pig. J Neurocytol. 2000;29(7):25-37.
19. Shepherd RK, Hardie NA. Deafness-Induced changes in the auditory pathway: implications for cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2001;6:305-318 (Pubitemid 34195661)
20. Roehm PC, Hansen MR. Strategies to preserve or regenerate spiral ganglion neurons. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2005;13(5):294-300. (Pubitemid 41339037)
21. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Activity-dependent developmental plasticicty of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2003;24(6):485-499 (Pubitemid 37517833)
22. Hughes ML, Werff KRV, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Kelsay DMR, Teagle HFB, Lowder MW. A longitudinal study of Electrode Impedance, the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Behavioral Measures in Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant users. Ear Hear. 2001;22(6):471-486 (Pubitemid 34003341)
23. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay D, Gantz BJ. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem response in nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear.1994;15:168-176 (Pubitemid 24125512)
24. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential. Ear Hear.2000;21:280-290 (Pubitemid 30679794)
25. Dees DC et al. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI 24M Cochlear Implant system. Audiol Neurootol. 2005;10:105-116 (Pubitemid 40976011)
26. Haenggeli A, zhang S, Visher MW, Pelizzone M, Rouiller EM. Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) of the Cochlear Nerve in Response to Pulsatile Electrical Stimulation of the Cochlea in rat: effects of stimulation at high rates. Audiology. 1998;37(6):353-371
27. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Nourski KV, Robinson BK. Electrode configuration influences action potential site and ensemble stochastic response proporties. Hear Res.2003;175(1-2):200-214 (Pubitemid 36870692)
28. Hall RD. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res.1990;49(1-3):155- 168 (Pubitemid 20370259)
29. Charasse B, Chanal JM, Berger-Vachon C, Collet L. Influence of stimulus frequency on NRT recordings. Int J Audiol. 2004;43(4):236-244 (Pubitemid 38520350)
30. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: Data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am.1990a, 88(3):1385-1391 (Pubitemid 20324408)
31. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J. The Relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: data from adults.Ear Hear.2000;21(2):151-163
32. Mason S. Eletrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes. Int J Audiol.2004;43:33-38
33. a ed. London: Singular Publishing Group, Inc. 1998. p.359-389
34. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: Parametric data from the cat. J Acoust Soc Am.1990b,88(5):2205-2210 (Pubitemid 20324408)
35. Brown CJ. using electrically evoked auditory potentials in the clinical management of cochlear implant candidates and recipients. Sem Hear.1996;3(4):389-401.
36. Shpak T, Berlin M, Luntz M. Objective measurements of auditory nerve recovery function in nucleus CI24 implantees in relation to subjective preference of stimulation rate. Acta Otolaryngol.2004;124:679-683 (Pubitemid 39093350)
37. Nelson DA, Donaldson GS. Psychophysical recovery from singlepulse forward masking in electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am .2001;106(6):2921-2933 (Pubitemid 32545136)
38. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B. Preliminary experience with Neural Response Telemetry in the Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant. Am J Otol. 1998;19(3):320-327 (Pubitemid 28196818)