Longitudinal behaviour of neural response telemetry (NRT) data and clinical implications

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 252-263

  Lai, Wai Kong ^a   Aksit, Mehmet ^b   Akdas, Ferda ^b   Dillier, Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Evoked potentials; Neural response telemetry; Speech processor fitting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DATA ANALYSIS; EVOKED RESPONSE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LOUDNESS; MONITORING; NERVE POTENTIAL; NEURAL RESPONSE TELEMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TELEMETRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TELEMETRY;

EID: 3142619139     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050034     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Abbas, P.J., Brown, C.J., Shallop, J.K., Firszt, J.B., Hughes, M.L., et al. 1999. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear, 20, 45-59.
2. Brown, C.J., Hughes, M.L., Luk, B., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A., et al. 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear, 21, 151-163.
3. Charlet de Sauvage, R., Lima da Costa, D., Erre, J.P. & Aran, J.M. 1997. Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea. Hear Res, 110, 119-134.
4. Clark, G.M., Shepherd, R.K., Franz, B.K.-H., Dowell, R.C., Tong, Y.C., et al. 1988. The histopathology of the human temporal bone and auditory central nervous system following cochlear implantation in a patient. Correlation with psychophysics and speech perception results. Acta Otol Suppl, 448, 1-65.
5. Dillier, N., Lai, W.K., Almqvist, B., Frohne, C., Muller-Deile, J., et al. 2002. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111, 407-414.
6. Dorman, M.F., Smith, L.M., Dankowski, K., McCandless, G. & Parkin, J.L. 1992. Long-term measures of electrode impedance and auditory thresholds for the Ineraid cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Res, 35, 1126-1130.
7. Franck, K.H. & Norton, S.J. 2001. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with the neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear Hear, 22, 289-299.
8. Hall, R.D. 1990. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res, 45, 123-136.
9. Hughes, M.L., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A.A. & Gervais, J.P. 2000. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear Hear, 21, 164-174.
10. Johnsson, L.G., House, W.F. & Linthicum, F.H. 1979. Bilateral cochlear implants: histological findings in a pair of temporal bones. Laryngoscope, 89, 759-762.
11. Lai, W.K. 1999. An NRT Cookbook. Basel: Cochlear AG.
12. Smoorenburg, G.F., Willeboer, C. & van Dijk, J.E. 2002. Speech perception in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant users with processor settings based on electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds. Aud Neuro-Otol, 7(6), 335-347.