Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: Effects of stimulation at high rates

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 353-371

  Haenggeli, A ^a,b   Zhang, J S ^a   Fischer, M W ^c   Pelizzone, M ^b   Rouiller, E M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

^b GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Brainstem responses; Cochlear implants; Electrical stimulation; Electrically evoked auditory; Evoked potentials; Fatigue; Forward masking

Indexed keywords

NEOMYCIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; PULSE RATE; RAT;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; NEOMYCIN; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032431985     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206099809072989     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Eddington D K. Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 885–891
2. Eddington D K, Dobelle W H, Brackmann D E, Mladejovsky M G, Parkin J. Place and periodicity pitch by stimulation of multiple scala tym-pani electrodes in deaf volunteers. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Org 1978; 24: 1–5
3. Eddington D K, Dobelle W H, Brackmann D E, Mladejovsky M G, Parkin J L. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intra-cochlear stimulation in man. Ann Otol. Laryngol 1978; 87: 5–39
4. Shannon R V. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II: Channel interaction. Hear Res 1983; 12: 1–16
5. Favre E, Pelizzone M. Channel interactions in patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Hear Res 1993; 66: 150–156
6. Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K, Rabinowitz W M. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236–238
7. Boëx C, Pelizzone M, Montandon P. Improvements in speech recognition with the CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel intracochlear implant. Advances in Cochlear Implants, I J, Hochmair-Desoyer, E D, Hochmair. Manz, Wien 1994; 136–140
8. Pelizzone M, Boëx-Spano C, Sigrist A, François J, Tinembard J, Degive C, Montandon P. First field trials with a portable CIS processor for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1995; 115: 622–628
9. Boëx-Spano C, Pelizzone M, Montandon P. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1996; 17: 61–68
10. Jewett D L. Volume conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1970; 28: 609–618
11. Shaw N A. The effect of pentobarbital on the auditory evoked response in the brainstem of the rat. Neuropharmacol 1986; 25: 63–69
12. Shaw N A. Central auditory conduction time in the rat. Exp Brain Res 1990; 79: 217–220
13. Shaw N A. Auditory evoked potentials recorded from different skull locations in the rat. Int J Neurosci 1993; 70: 277–283
14. Church M W, Gritzke R. Effects of ketamine anesthesia on the rat brainstem auditory evoked potential as a function of dose and stimulus intensity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 67: 570–583
15. Newton E H, Cooper W A, Jr, Coleman J R. Rate and frequency interactions in the auditory brainstem response of the adult rat. Hear Res 1992; 60: 73–79
16. Overbeck G W, Church M W. Effects of tone burst frequency and intensity on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) from albino and pigmented rats. Hear Res 1992; 59: 129–137
17. Van D, en Honert C, Stypulkowski P H. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear Res 1986; 21: 109–126
18. Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Electrically evoked responses in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1989; 28: 230–238
19. Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Binaural interaction in a cochlear implant patient. Hear Res 1990; 48: 287–290
20. Miller C A, Abbas P J, Brown C J. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response to stimulation of different sites in the cochlea. Hear Res 1993; 66: 130–142
21. Wilson B S, Finley C C, Zerbi M, Lawson D T. Speech processors for auditory prostheses. NIH, Seventh Quarterly Progress Report 1994; 1–69
22. Shepherd R K, Clark G M, Black R C. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Acta Otolaryngol, Suppl. 1983; 399: 19–31
23. Shepherd R K, Matsushima J, Millard R E, Clark G M. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation using non-charge balanced stimuli. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 111: 848–860
24. Shepherd R K, Hatsushika S, Clark G M. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1993; 66: 108–120
25. Stypulkowski P H, Van D, en Honert C. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I: Compound action potential recordings. Hear Res 1984; 14: 205–223
26. Hall R D. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 1990; 45: 123–136
27. Leake P A, Snyder R L, Hradek G T, Rebscher S J. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: Effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. Hear Res 1992; 64: 99–117
28. Ni D, Shepherd R K, Seldon H L, Xu S-A, Clark G M, Millard R E. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens. Hear Res 1992; 62: 63–81
29. Miller C A, Abbas P J, Robinson B K. Characterization of wave I of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1993; 69: 35–44
30. Miller C A, Abbas P J, Robinson B K. The use of long-duration current pulses to assess nerve survival. Hear Res 1994; 78: 11–26
31. Miller C A, Woodruff K E, Pfingst B E. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. 1. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures. Hear Res 1995; 92: 85–99
32. Miller C A, Faulkner M J, Pfingst B E. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. 2. Changes in electrophysiological and psychophysical measures over time. Hear Res 1995; 92: 100–111
33. Killian M JP, Klis S FL, Smoorenburg G F. Adaptation in the compound action potential response of the guinea pig VHIth nerve to electric stimulation. Hear Res 1994; 81: 66–82
34. Smith D W, Finley C C, Van D, en Honert C, Olszyk V B, Konrad K EM. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat. I. Absolute threshold. Hear Res 1994; 81: 1–10
35. Vischer M W, Häusler R, Rouiller E M. Distribution of Fos-like immuno-reactivity in the auditory pathway of the Sprague-Dawley rat elicited by cochlear electrical stimulation. Neurosci Res 1994; 19: 175–185
36. Tykocinski M, Shepherd R K, Clark G M. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. Hear Res 1995; 88: 124–142
37. Fullerton B C, Kiang N YS. The effect of brainstem lesions on brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the cat. Hear Res 1990; 49: 363–390
38. Melcher J R. The cellular generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, PhD Thesis 1994; 1–268
39. Melcher J R, Knudson I M, Fullerton B C, Guinan J J, Jr, Norris B E, Kiang N YS. Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. 1. An experimental approach to their identification. Hear Res 1996; 93: 1–27
40. Melcher J R, Guinan J J, Jr, Knudson I M, Kiang N YS. Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. 2. Correlating lesion sites with waveform changes. Hear Res 1996; 93: 28–51
41. Melcher J R, Kiang N YS. Generators of the brainstem auditory evoked potential in cat. 3. Identified cell populations. Hear Res 1996; 93: 52–71
42. Vischer M W, Bajo-Lorenzana V, Zhang J S, Häusler R, Rouiller E M. Activity elicited in the auditory pathway of the rat by electrical stimulation of the cochlea. ORL J Otorhino-laryngol Relat Spec 1995; 57: 305–309
43. Zhang J S, Haenggeli C A, Tempini A, Vischer M W, Moret V, Rouiller E M. Electrically induced Fos-like immuno-reactivity in the auditory pathway of the rat: Effects of survival time, duration, and intensity of stimulation. Brain Res Bull 1996; 39: 75–82
44. Keithley E M, Feldman M L. Spiral ganglion cell counts in an age-graded series of rat cochleas. J Comp Neurol 1979; 188: 429–442
45. Vischer M W, Haenggeli A, Zhang J S, Pelizzone M, Häusler R, Rouiller E M. Effect of high frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants. AmJOtol 1997; 18: S27–S29
46. Zhang J S, Vischer M W, Haenggeli C A, Rouiller E M. Responses of the auditory nerve to high rate pulsatile stimulation: comparison between normal and deafened rats. Neural Processing of Acoustic Signals in the Central Auditory Pathway, J., Syka. Plenum Press, New York 1997; 577–583
47. Brown C J, Abbas P J, Gantz B J. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potential: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1385–1391
48. Javel E, Tong Y C, Shepherd R K, Clark G. Responses of cat auditory nerve fibers to biphasic electrical current pulses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; 128: 26–30, 96 Suppl
49. Charlet de Sauvage R, Lima da Costa D, Erre J-P, Aran J-M. Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea. Hear Res 1997; 110: 119–134
50. McKay C, McDermott H, Clark G M. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2664–2673