Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: Implementation, audit and outcomes

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 43, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages

  Mason, Steve ^a  

^a QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; Intraoperative monitoring; Objective measures

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC REFLEX; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; FACIAL NERVE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NERVE STIMULATION; OPERATING ROOM; PATIENT MONITORING; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELEMETRY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; DEAFNESS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HUMANS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; REFLEX, ACOUSTIC; TELEMETRY;

EID: 13144266699     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abbas, P.J., Brown, C.J., Shallop, J.K., Hughes, M.L., Hong, S.H., et al. 1999. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear, 20, 45-59.
2. Battmer, R.-D., Laszig, R. & Lehnhardt, E. 1990. Electrically elicited stapedius reflex in cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear, 11, 370-374.
3. Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Fryauf-Bertschy, H., Kelsay, D. & Gantz, B.J. 1994. Intra-operative and post-operative electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in Nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear, 15, 168-176.
4. Brown, C.J., Hughes, M.L., Luk, B., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A., et al. 2000. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus CI24M speech processor. Ear Hear, 21, 151-163.
5. Cullington, H.E. (ed.) 2003. Cochlear Implants: Objective Measures. London: Whurr.
6. French, M.L. 1999. Electrical impedance measurements with the CI24M cochlear implant for a child with Mondini dysplasia. Br J Audiol, 33, 61-66.
7. Garnham, J., Gibbin, K.P., Cope, Y. & Mason, S.M. 2003. Retrospective study of intra-operative testing with the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant and use of the back-up device. Cochlear Implants Int, 4(1), 1-10.
8. Garnham, J., Marsden, J. & Mason, S.M. 2001. Profiles of AEVs for intra- and post-operative integrity test measurements in young children with the Nucleus mini 22 cochlear implant. Br J Audiol, 35, 31-42.
9. Hodges, A.V., Butts, S.L. & King, J.E. 2003. Electrically evoked stapedial reflexes: utility in cochlear implant patients. In: H.E. Cullington (ed.) Cochlear Implants: Objective Measures. London: Whurr, pp. 81-95.
10. Hughes, M.L., Brown, C.J., Abbas, P.J., Wolaver, A.A. & Gervais, J.P. 2000. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: data from children. Ear Hear, 21, 164-174.
11. Kileny, P.R. 1991. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses. Am J Otol, 12, 37-42.
12. Mason, S.M. 2003a. Electrophysiological and objective tests. In: B. McCormick & S. Archbold (eds.) Cochlear Implants for Young Children, 2nd edn. London: Whurr, pp. 162-216.
13. Mason, S.M. 2003b. The electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. In: H.E. Cullington (ed.) Cochlear Implants: Objective Measures. London: Whurr, pp. 130-159.
14. Mason, S.M., Cope, Y., Garnham, J., O'Donoghue, G.M. & Gibbin, K.P. 2001. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Br J Audiol, 35, 225-235.
15. Mason, S.M., Dodd, M., Gibbin, K.P. & O'Donoghue, G.M. 2000. Assessment of the functioning of peripheral auditory pathways after cochlear re-implantation in young children using intra-operative objective measures. Br J Audiol, 34, 179-186.
16. Mason, S.M., Garnham, C.W., Sheppard, S., O'Donoghue, G.M. & Gibbin, K.P. 1995. An intraoperative test protocol for objective assessment of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 50, 38-44.
17. Mason, S.M., Sheppard, S., Garnham, C.W., Lutman, M.E., O'Donoghue, G.M., et al. 1994. Improving the relationship of intraoperative EABR threshold to T-level in young children receiving the Nucleus cochlear implant. In: I.J. Hochmair-Desoyer & E.S. Hochmair (eds.) Advances in Cochlear Implants. Wein: Manz, pp. 44-49.
18. Maxwell, A., Mason, S.M. & O'Donoghue, G.M. 1999. Cochlear nerve aplasia: its importance in cochlear implantation. Am J Otol, 20, 335-337.
19. Mens, L.H.M. 2003. Telemetry: features and applications. In: H.E. Cullington (ed.) Cochlear Implants: Objective Measures. London: Whurr, pp. 23-39.
20. Mens, L.H.M., Oostendorp, T. & van den Broek, P. 1994. Identifying electrode failures with cochlear implant generated surface potentials. Ear Hear, 15, 330-338.
21. Shallop, J.K. 1997. Objective measurements and the audiological management of cochlear implant patients. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 53, 85-111.
22. Shallop, J.K., Beiter, A.L., Goin, D.W. & Mischke, R.E. 1990. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear, 11, 5-15.
23. Shallop, J.K., Carter, P., Feinman, G. & Tabor, B. 2003. Averaged electrode voltage measurements in patients with cochlear implants. In: H.E. Cullington (ed.) Cochlear Implants: Objective Measures. London: Whurr, pp. 40-80.
24. Spivak, L.G. & Chute, P.M. 1994. The relationship between electrical acoustic reflex thresholds and behavioral comfort levels in children and adult cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear, 15, 184-192.
25. Stephan, K., Welzl-Muller, K. & Stiglbrunner, H. 1991. Acoustic reflex in patients with cochlear implants (analog stimulation). Am J Otol, 12, 48-51.
26. Van den Borne, B., Snik, A.F.M., Mens, L.H.M., Brokx, J.P.L. & Van den Broek, P. 1996. Stapedius reflex measurements during surgery for cochlear implantation in children. Am J Otol, 17, 554-558.