GroEL-assisted protein folding: Does it occur within the chaperonin inner cavity?

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 2066-2083

  Marchenkov, Victor V ^a   Semisotnov, Gennady V ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PROTEIN RESEARCH   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Chaperones; GroEL ES chaperonin system; Protein aggregation; Protein folding

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONIN; LIGAND; POLYPEPTIDE;

DISSOCIATION; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

CHAPERONES; GROEL/ES CHAPERONIN SYSTEM; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BINDING SITES; CHAPERONIN 10; CHAPERONIN 60; ESCHERICHIA COLI; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING;

EID: 67049087960     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14220067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijms10052066     Document Type: Review

References (114)

1. Anfinsen, C.B. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973, 181, 223-230.
2. Seckler, R.; Jaenicke, R. Protein folding and protein refolding. FASEB J. 1992, 6, 2545-2552.
3. Ellis, J. Proteins as molecular chaperones. Nature 1987, 328, 378-379.
4. Gething, M.J.; Sambrook, J. Protein folding in the cell. Nature 1992, 355, 33-45.
5. Bochkareva, E.S.; Lissin, N.M.; Girshovich, A.S. Transient association of newly synthesized unfolded proteins with the heat-shock GroEL protein. Nature 1988, 336, 254-257.
6. Hayes, S.A.; Dice, J.F. Roles of molecular chaperones in protein degradation. J. Cell Biol. 1996, 132, 255-258.
7. Kandror, O.; Sherman, M.; Goldberg, A. Rapid degradation of an abnormal protein in Escherichia coli proceeds through repeated cycles of association with GroEL. J.Biol.Chem. 1999, 274, 37743-37749.
8. Gething, M.J. Protein folding. The difference with prokaryotes. Nature 1997, 388, 329-331.
9. Lindquist, S.; Craig, E.A. The heat-shock proteins. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1988, 22, 631-677.
10. Bukau, B.; Horwich, A.L. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell 1998, 92, 351-366.
11. Fink, A.L. Chaperone-mediated protein folding. Physiol. Rev. 1999, 79, 425-449.
12. Horwich, A.L.; Fenton, W.A.; Chapman, E.; Farr, G.W. Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 23, 115-145.
13. Jaenicke, R. What does protein refolding in vitro tell us about protein folding in the cell? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci. 1993, 339, 287-294.
14. Bhutani, N.; Udgaonkar, J.B. A thermodynamic coupling mechanism can explain the GroELmediated acceleration of the folding of barstar. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 297, 1037-1044.
15. Braig, K. Chaperonins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1998, 8, 159-165.
16. Feltham, J.L.; Gierasch, L.M. GroEL-substrate interactions: molding the fold, or folding the mold? Cell 2000, 100, 193-196.
17. Hartl, F.U. Protein folding. Secrets of a double-doughnut. Nature 1994, 371, 557-559.
18. Boisvert, D.C.; Wang, J.; Otwinowski, Z.; Horwich, A.L.; Sigler, P.B. The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATP gamma S. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1996, 3, 170-177.
19. Braig, K.; Simon, M.; Furuya, F.; Hainfeld, J.F.; Horwich, A.L. A polypeptide bound by the chaperonin groEL is localized within a central cavity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 3978-3982.
20. Braig, K.; Otwinowski, Z.; Hegde, R.; Boisvert, D.C.; Joachimiak, A.; Horwich, A.L.; Sigler, P.B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 1994, 371, 578-586.
21. Braig, K.; Adams, P.D.; Brunger, A.T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1995, 2, 1083-1094.
22. Chen, S.; Roseman, A.M.; Hunter, A.S.; Wood, S.P.; Burston, S.G.; Ranson, N.A.; Clarke, A.R.; Saibil, H.R. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 1994, 371, 261-264.
23. Fenton, W.A.; Kashi, Y.; Furtak, K.; Horwich, A.L. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 1994, 371, 614-619.
24. Horwich, A.L.; Low, K.B.; Fenton, W.A.; Hirshfield, I.N.; Furtak, K. Folding in vivo of bacterial cytoplasmic proteins: role of GroEL. Cell 1993, 74, 909-917.
25. Houry, W.A.; Frishman, D.; Eckerskorn, C.; Lottspeich, F.; Hartl, F.U. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 1999, 402, 147-154.
26. Hunt, J.F.; Weaver, A.J.; Landry, S.J.; Gierasch, L.; Deisenhofer, J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 1996, 379, 37-45.
27. Ishii, N.; Taguchi, H.; Sasabe, H.; Yoshida, M. Folding intermediate binds to the bottom of bullet-shaped holo-chaperonin and is readily accessible to antibody. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 236, 691-696.
28. Langer, T.; Pfeifer, G.; Martin, J.; Baumeister, W.; Hartl, F.U. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 4757-4765.
29. Roseman, A.M.; Chen, S.; White, H.; Braig, K.; Saibil, H.R. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell 1996, 87, 241-251.
30. Thiyagarajan, P.; Henderson, S.J.; Joachimiak, A. Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. Structure. 1996, 4, 79-88.
31. Viitanen, P.V.; Gatenby, A.A.; Lorimer, G.H. Purified chaperonin 60 (groEL) interacts with the nonnative states of a multitude of Escherichia coli proteins. Protein Sci. 1992, 1, 363-369.
32. Xu, Z.; Horwich, A.L.; Sigler, P.B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES- (ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 1997, 388, 741-750.
33. Clare, D.K.; Bakkes, P.J.; van Heerikhuizen H.; van der Vies, S.M.; Saibil, H.R. Chaperonin complex with a newly folded protein encapsulated in the folding chamber. Nature 2009, 457, 107-110.
34. van Duijn, E.; Bakkes, P.J.; Heeren, R.M.; van den Heuvel, R.H.; van Heerikhuizen, H.; van der Vies, S.M.; Heck, A.J. Monitoring macromolecular complexes involved in the chaperoninassisted protein folding cycle by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 371-376.
35. van Duijn, E.; Barendregt, A.; Synowsky, S.; Versluis, C.; Heck, A.J. Chaperonin complexes monitored by ion mobility mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1452-1459.
36. Ellis, R.J.; Hartl, F.U. Principles of protein folding in the cellular environment. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1999, 9, 102-110.
37. Martin, J.; Mayhew, M.; Langer, T.; Hartl, F.U. The reaction cycle of GroEL and GroES in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Nature 1993, 366, 228-233.
38. Mayhew, M.; da Silva, A.C.; Martin, J.; Erdjument-Bromage, H.; Tempst, P.; Hartl, F.U. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature 1996, 379, 420-426.
39. Radford, S.E. GroEL: More than Just a folding cage. Cell 2006, 125, 831-833.
40. Weissman, J.S.; Rye, H.S.; Fenton, W.A.; Beechem, J.M.; Horwich, A.L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 1996, 84, 481-490.
41. Chen, L.; Sigler, P.B. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell 1999, 99, 757-768.
42. Ewalt, K.L.; Hendrick, J.P.; Houry, W.A.; Hartl, F.U. In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system. Cell 1997, 90, 491-500.
43. Lau, C.K.; Churchich, J.E. Binding of polylysine to GroEL. Inhibition of the refolding of mMDH. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1431, 282-289.
44. Brunschier, R.; Danner, M.; Seckler, R. Interactions of phage P22 tailspike protein with GroE molecular chaperones during refolding in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 2767-2772.
45. Gordon, C.L.; Sather, S.K.; Casjens, S.; King, J. Selective in vivo rescue by GroEL/ES of thermolabile folding intermediates to phage P22 structural proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 27941-27951.
46. Song, J.L.; Wynn, R.M.; Chuang, D.T. Interactions of GroEL/GroES with a heterodimeric intermediate during ?2?2 assembly of mitochondrial branched-chain ?-ketoacid dehydrogenase. cis Capping of the native-like 86-kDa intermediate by GroES. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 22305-22312.
47. Chaudhuri, T.K.; Farr, G.W.; Fenton, W.A.; Rospert, S.; Horwich, A.L. GroEL/GroES-mediated folding of a protein too large to be encapsulated. Cell 2001, 107, 235-246.
48. Paul, S.; Punam, S.; Chaudhuri, T.K. Chaperone-assisted refolding of Escherichia coli maltodextrin glucosidase. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 6000-6010.
49. Farr, G.W.; Fenton, W.A.; Chaudhuri, T.K.; Clare, D.K.; Saibil, H.R.; Horwich, A.L. Folding with and without encapsulation by cis- and trans-only GroEL-GroES complexes. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 3220-3230.
50. Goloubinoff, P.; Christeller, J.T.; Gatenby, A.A.; Lorimer, G.H. Reconstitution of active dimeric ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from an unfolded state depends on two chaperonin proteins and Mg-ATP. Nature 1989, 342, 884-889.
51. Miller, A.D.; Maghlaoui, K.; Albanese, G.; Kleinjan, D.A.; Smith, C. Escherichia coli chaperonins cpn60 (groEL) and cpn10 (groES) do not catalyse the refolding of mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase. Biochem. J. 1993, 291, 139-144.
52. Schmidt, M.; Rutkat, K.; Rachel, R.; Pfeifer, G.; Jaenicke, R.; Viitanen, P.; Lorimer, G.; Buchner, J. Symmetric complexes of GroE chaperonins as part of the functional cycle. Science 1994, 265, 656-659.
53. Corrales, F.J.; Fersht, A.R. Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 4509-4512.
54. Kawata, Y.; Nosaka, K.; Hongo, K.; Mizobata, T.; Nagai, J. Chaperonin GroE and ADP facilitate the folding of various proteins and protect against heat inactivation. FEBS Lett. 1994, 345, 229-232.
55. Sparrer, H.; Lilie, H.; Buchner, J. Dynamics of the GroEL-protein complex: effects of nucleotides and folding mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 258, 74-87.
56. Viitanen, P.V.; Donaldson, G.K.; Lorimer, G.H.; Lubben, T.H.; Gatenby, A.A. Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 9716-9723.
57. Hayer-Hartl, M.K.; Weber, F.; Hartl, F.U. Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 6111-6121.
58. Staniforth, R.A.; Burston, S.G.; Atkinson, T.; Clarke, A.R. Affinity of chaperonin-60 for a protein substrate and its modulation by nucleotides and chaperonin-10. Biochem. J. 1994, 300, 651-658.
59. Kuwajima, K. The molten globule state of alpha-lactalbumin. FASEB J. 1996, 10, 102-109.
60. Martin, J.; Langer, T.; Boteva, R.; Schramel, A.; Horwich, A.L.; Hartl, F.U. Chaperoninmediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate. Nature 1991, 352, 36-42.
61. Semisotnov, G.V.; Rodionova, N.A.; Razgulyaev, O.I.; Uversky, V.N.; Gripas', A.F.; Gilmanshin, R. I. Study of the "molten globule" intermediate state in protein folding by a hydrophobic fluorescent probe. Biopolymers 1991, 31, 119-128.
62. Katsumata, K.; Okazaki, A.; Kuwajima, K. Effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of alphalactalbumin. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 258, 827-838.
63. Marchenkov, V.V.; Sokolovskii, I.V.; Kotova, N.V.; Galzitskaya, O.V.; Bochkareva, E.S.; Girshovich, A.S.; Semisotnov, G.V. The interaction of the GroEL chaperone with early kinetic intermediates of renaturing proteins inhibits the formation of their native structure. Biofizika 2004, 49, 987-994.
64. Perrett, S.; Zahn, R.; Stenberg, G.; Fersht, A.R. Importance of electrostatic interactions in the rapid binding of polypeptides to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 269, 892-901.
65. Hayer-Hartl, M.K.; Ewbank, J.J.; Creighton, T.E.; Hartl, F.U. Conformational specificity of the chaperonin GroEL for the compact folding intermediates of alpha-lactalbumin. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 3192-3202.
66. Katsumata, K.; Okazaki, A.; Tsurupa, G.P.; Kuwajima, K. Dominant forces in the recognition of a transient folding intermediate of alpha-lactalbumin by GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 264, 643-649.
67. Marchenko, N.Y.; Marchenkov, V.V.; Kotova, N.V.; Kaliman, P.A.; Semisotnov, G.V. Complex of GroEL chaperone with fluorescein-labeled denatured pepsin: stoichiometry and role of the ligands. J. V.N. Karazin's Kharkov National Univ. 2005, 1, 53-56.
68. Marchenko, N.I.; Marchenkov, V.V.; Kaisheva, A.L.; Kashparov, I.A.; Kotova, N.V.; Kaliman, P.A.; Semisotnov, G.V. Affinity chromatography of GroEL chaperonin based on denatured proteins: role of electrostatic interactions in regulation of GroEL affinity for protein substrates. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2006, 71, 1357-1364.
69. Viitanen, P.V.; Lubben, T.H.; Reed, J.; Goloubinoff, P.; O'Keefe, D.P.; Lorimer, G.H. Chaperonin-facilitated refolding of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase and ATP hydrolysis by chaperonin 60 (groEL) are K+ dependent. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 5665-5671.
70. Clark, A.C.; Frieden, C. GroEL-mediated folding of structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 268, 512-525.
71. Ben-Zvi, A.P.; Chatellier, J.; Fersht, A.R.; Goloubinoff, P. Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 15275-15280.
72. Weissman, J.S.; Hohl, C.M.; Kovalenko, O.; Kashi, Y.; Chen, S.; Braig, K.; Saibil, H.R.; Fenton, W.A.; Horwich, A.L. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 1995, 83, 577-587.
73. Ying, B.W.; Taguchi, H.; Ueda, T. Co-translational binding of GroEL to nascent polypeptides is followed by post-translational encapsulation by GroES to mediate protein folding. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 21813-21819.
74. Zahn, R.; Buckle, A.M.; Perrett, S.; Johnson, C.M.; Corrales, F.J.; Golbik, R.; Fersht, A.R. Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 15024-15029.
75. Picketts, D.J.; Mayanil, C.S.; Gupta, R.S. Molecular cloning of a Chinese hamster mitochondrial protein related to the "chaperonin" family of bacterial and plant proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 12001-12008.
76. Nielsen, K.L.; Cowan, N.J. A single ring is sufficient for productive chaperonin-mediated folding In Vivo. Mol. Cell 1998, 2, 93-99.
77. Viitanen, P.V.; Lorimer, G.H.; Seetharam, R.; Gupta, R.S.; Oppenheim, J.; Thomas, J.O.; Cowan, N.J. Mammalian mitochondrial chaperonin 60 functions as a single toroidal ring. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 695-698.
78. Chatellier, J.; Hill, F.; Foster, N.W.; Goloubinoff, P.; Fersht, A.R. From minichaperone to GroEL 3: properties of an active single-ring mutant of GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 304, 897-910.
79. Makino, Y.; Taguchi, H.; Yoshida, M. Truncated GroEL monomer has the ability to promote folding of rhodanese without GroES and ATP. FEBS Lett. 1993, 336, 363-367.
80. Taguchi, H.; Makino, Y.; Yoshida, M. Monomeric chaperonin-60 and its 50-kDa fragment possess the ability to interact with non-native proteins, to suppress aggregation; to promote protein folding. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 8529-8534.
81. Fenton, W.A.; Horwich, A.L. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 743-760.
82. Hartl, F.U.; Martin, J.; Neupert, W. Protein folding in the cell: the role of molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp60. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1992, 21, 293-322.
83. Tang, Y.C.; Chang, H.C.; Roeben, A.; Wischnewski, D.; Wischnewski, N.; Kerner, M.J.; Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein. Cell 2006, 125, 903-914.
84. Tang, Y.C.; Chang, H.C.; Chakraborty, K.; Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Essential role of the chaperonin folding compartment in vivo. EMBO J. 2008, 27, 1458-1468.
85. Farr, G.W.; Fenton, W.A.; Horwich, A.L. Perturbed ATPase activity and not "close confinement" of substrate in the cis cavity affects rates of folding by tail-multiplied GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 5342-5347.
86. Kanno, R.; Koike-Takeshita, A.; Yokoyama, K.; Taguchi, H.; Mitsuoka, K. Cryo-EM structure of the native GroEL-GroES complex from Thermus thermophilus encapsulating substrate inside the cavity. Structure 2009, 17, 287-293.
87. Todd, M.J.; Lorimer, G.H.; Thirumalai, D. Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 4030-4035.
88. Aoki, K.; Taguchi, H.; Shindo, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Ogasahara, K.; Yutani, K.; Tanaka, N. Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein binding reaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32158-32162.
89. Lin, Z.; Schwartz, F.P.; Eisenstein, E. The hydrophobic nature of GroEL-substrate binding. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 1011-1014.
90. Tsurupa, G.P.; Ikura, T.; Makio, T.; Kuwajima, K. Refolding kinetics of staphylococcal nuclease and its mutants in the presence of the chaperonin GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 277, 733-745.
91. Corrales, F.J.; Fersht, A.R. The folding of GroEL-bound barnase as a model for chaperoninmediated protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 5326-5330.
92. Clark, A.C.; Hugo, E.; Frieden, C. Determination of regions in the dihydrofolate reductase structure that interact with the molecular chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 5893-5901.
93. Deaton, J.; Sun, J.; Holzenburg, A.; Struck, D.K.; Berry, J.; Young, R. Functional bacteriorhodopsin is efficiently solubilized and delivered to membranes by the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2281-2286.
94. Deaton, J.; Savva, C.G.; Sun, J.; Holzenburg, A.; Berry, J.; Young, R. Solubilization and delivery by GroEL of megadalton complexes of the lambda holin. Protein Sci. 2004, 13, 1778-1786.
95. Clark, A.C.; Ramanathan, R.; Frieden, C. Purification of GroEL with low fluorescence background. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 290, 100-118.
96. Voziyan, P.A.; Fisher, M.T. Chaperonin-assisted folding of glutamine synthetase under nonpermissive conditions: off-pathway aggregation propensity does not determine the cochaperonin requirement. Protein Sci. 2000, 9, 2405-2412.
97. Azem, A.; Kessel, M.; Goloubinoff, P. Characterization of a functional GroEL14(GroES7)2 chaperonin hetero-oligomer. Science 1994, 265, 653-656.
98. Engel, A.; Hayer-Hartl, M.K.; Goldie, K.N.; Pfeifer, G.; Hegerl, R.; Muller, S.; da Silva, A.C.; Baumeister, W.; Hartl, F.U. Functional significance of symmetrical versus asymmetrical GroELGroES chaperonin complexes. Science 1995, 269, 832-836.
99. Llorca, O.; Carrascosa, J.L.; Valpuesta, J.M. Biochemical characterization of symmetric GroELGroES complexes. Evidence for a role in protein folding. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 68-76.
100. Sparrer, H.; Rutkat, K.; Buchner, J. Catalysis of protein folding by symmetric chaperone complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 1096-1100.
101. Todd, M.J.; Viitanen, P.V.; Lorimer, G.H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science 1994, 265, 659-666.
102. Torok, Z.; Vigh, L.; Goloubinoff, P. Fluorescence detection of symmetric GroEL14(GroES7)2 heterooligomers involved in protein release during the chaperonin cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 16180-16186.
103. Marchenko, N.I.; Marchenkov, V.V.; Kotova, N.V.; Semisotnov, G.V.; Bulankina, N.I.; Kaliman, P.A. Effect of ADP and GroES on interaction of molecular chaperonin GroEL with non-native lysozyme. Ukr. Biokhim. Zh. 2003, 75, 88-94.
104. Plotnikov, A.N.; Vasilenko, K.S.; Kirkitadze, M.D.; Kotova, N.V.; Motuz, L.P.; Korotkov, K.V.; Semisotnov, G.V.; Alakhov, Y.B. Biosynthesis and conformational state of 17-kDa and 27-kDa N-terminal fragments of elongation factor EF-2 in solution. Bioorg. Khim. 1996, 22, 489-502.
105. Rye, H.S.; Burston, S.G.; Fenton, W.A.; Beechem, J.M.; Xu, Z.; Sigler, P.B.; Horwich, A.L. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 1997, 388, 792-798.
106. Burston, S.G.; Ranson, N.A.; Clarke, A.R. The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 249, 138-152.
107. Ranson, N.A.; Burston, S.G.; Clarke, A.R. Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 266, 656-664.
108. Marchenkov, V.V.; Marchenko, N.I.; Marchenkova, S.Y.; Semisotnov, G.V. Molecular chaperonins of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Adv. Biol. Chem.(Moscow) 2006, 46, 279-302.
109. Guex, N.; Peitsch, M.C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 2714-2723.
110. Grantham, J.; Llorca, O.; Valpuesta, J.M.; Willison, K.R. Partial occlusion of both cavities of the eukaryotic chaperonin with antibody has no effect upon the rates of beta-actin or alpha-tubulin folding. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 4587-4591.
111. Ehrnsperger, M.; Gaestel, M.; Buchner, J. Analysis of chaperone properties of small Hsp's. Methods Mol. Biol. 2000, 99, 421-429.
112. Markossian, K.A.; Yudin, I.K.; Kurganov, B.I. Mechanism of Suppression of Protein Aggregation by ?-Crystallin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 1314-1345.
113. Palleros, D.R.; Reid, K.L.; Shi, L., Welch, W.J.; Fink, A.L. ATP-induced protein-Hsp70 complex dissociation requires K+ but not ATP hydrolysis. Nature 1993, 365, 664-666.
114. Wendler, P.; Shorter, J.; Snead, D.; Plisson, C.; Clare, D.K.; Lindquist, S.; Saibil, H.R. Motor mechanism for protein threading through Hsp104. Mol. Cell 2009, 34, 81-92.