Regulation of polymerase exchange between Polη and Polδ by monoubiquitination of PCNA and the movement of DNA polymerase holoenzyme

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 105, Issue 14, 2008, Pages 5361-5366

  Zhuang, Zhihao ^a,d   Johnson, Robert E ^b   Haracska, Lajos ^c   Prakash, Louise ^b   Prakash, Satya ^b   Benkovic, Stephen J ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Holoenzyme stability; Translesion DNA synthesis; Ubiquitin binding domain

Indexed keywords

CYCLINE; HOLOENZYME; POLYMERASE DELTA; POLYMERASE ETA;

ARTICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN MOTIF; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; UBIQUITINATION;

DNA POLYMERASE III; DNA-DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE; HOLOENZYMES; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; UBIQUITINATION;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 44449138846     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801310105     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Garg P, Burgers PM (2005) DNA polymerases that propagate the eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 40:115-128.
2. Kraus E, Leung WY, Haber JE (2001) Break-induced replication: A review and an example in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:8255-8262.
3. Cox MM (2002) The nonmutagenic repair of broken replication forks via recombination. Mutat Res 510:107-120.
4. Broomfield S, Hryciw T, Xiao W (2001) DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 486:167-184.
5. Torres-Ramos CA, Prakash S, Prakash L (2002) Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 22:2419-2426.
6. Blastyak A, et al. (2007) Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol Cell 28:167-175.
7. Prakash S, Johnson RE, Prakash L (2005) Eukaryotic translesion synthesis DNA polymerases: Specificity of structure and function. Annu Rev Biochem 74:317-353.
8. Friedberg EC, Lehmann AR, Fuchs RP (2005) Trading places: How do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis? Mol Cell 18:499-505.
9. Yang J, Zhuang Z, Roccasecca RM, Trakselis MA, Benkovic SJ (2004) The dynamic processivity of the T4 DNA polymerase during replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8289-8294.
10. Johnson DE, Takahashi M, Hamdan SM, Lee SJ, Richardson CC (2007) Exchange of DNA polymerases at the replication fork of bacteriophage T7. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:5312-5317.
11. Hamdan SM, et al. (2007) Dynamic DNA helicase-DNA polymerase interactions assure processive replication fork movement. Mol Cell 27:539-549.
12. Indiani C, McInerney P, Georgescu R, Goodman MF, O'Donnell M (2005) A sliding-clamp toolbelt binds high- and low-fidelity DNA polymerases simultaneously. Mol Cell 19:805-815.
13. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S (2002) RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135-141.
14. Stelter P, Ulrich HD (2003) Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425:188-191.
15. Haracska L, Torres-Ramos CA, Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L (2004) Opposing effects of ubiquitin conjugation and SUMO modification of PCNA on replicational bypass of DNA lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 24:4267-4274.
16. Bienko M, et al. (2005) Ubiquitin-binding domains in Y-family polymerases regulate translesion synthesis. Science 310:1821-1824.
17. Wood A, Garg P, Burgers PM (2007) A ubiquitin-binding motif in the translesion DNA polymerase Rev1 mediates its essential functional interaction with ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem 282:20256-20263.
18. Plosky BS, et al. (2006) Controlling the subcellular localization of DNA polymerases ι and η via interactions with ubiquitin. EMBO J 25:2847-2855.
19. Watanabe K, et al. (2004) Rad18 guides pol η to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J 23:3886-3896.
20. Haracska L, Unk I, Prakash L, Prakash S (2006) Ubiquitylation of yeast proliferating cell nuclear antigen and its implications for translesion DNA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6477-6482.
21. Garg P, Burgers PM (2005) Ubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen activates translesion DNA polymerases η and REV1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18361-18366.
22. Parker JL, Bielen AB, Dikic I, Ulrich HD (2007) Contributions of ubiquitin- and PCNA binding domains to the activity of polymerase η in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 35:881-889.
23. Zhuang Z, Yoder BL, Burgers PM, Benkovic SJ (2006) The structure of a ring-opened proliferating cell nuclear antigen-replication factor C complex revealed by fluorescence energy transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:2546-2551.
24. Johansson E, Garg P, Burgers PM (2004) The Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerase δ contains separable domains for processive replication and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) binding. J Biol Chem 279:1907-1915.
25. Haracska L, Kondratick CM, Unk I, Prakash S, Prakash L (2001) Interaction with PCNA is essential for yeast DNA polymerase η function. Mol Cell 8:407-415.
26. Acharya N, Brahma A, Haracska L, Prakash L, Prakash S (2007) Mutations in the ubiquitin binding UBZ motif of DNA polymerase η do not impair its function in translesion synthesis during replication. Mol Cell Biol 27:7266-7272.
27. Kondratick CM, Washington MT, Prakash S, Prakash L (2001) Acidic residues critical for the activity and biological function of yeast DNA polymerase η. Mol Cell Biol 21:2018-2025.
28. Trincao J, et al. (2001) Structure of the catalytic core of S. cerevisiae DNA polymerase η: Implications for translesion DNA synthesis. Mol Cell 8:417-426.
29. Kannouche PL, Wing J, Lehmann AR (2004) Interaction of human DNA polymerase η with monoubiquitinated PCNA: A possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 14:491-500.
30. Bomar MG, Pai MT, Tzeng SR, Li SS, Zhou P (2007) Structure of the ubiquitin-binding zinc finger domain of human DNA Y-polymerase η. EMBO Rep 8:247-251.
31. Bunting KA, Roe SM, Pearl LH (2003) Structural basis for recruitment of translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV/DinB to the β-clamp. EMBO J 22:5883-5892.
32. Huang TT, et al. (2006) Regulation of monoubiquitinated PCNA by DUB autocleavage. Nat Cell Biol 8:339-347.
33. Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L (1999) Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Polη. Science 283:1001-1004.
34. Johnson RE, Prakash L, Prakash S (2006) Yeast and human translesion DNA synthesis polymerases: Expression, purification, and biochemical characterization. Methods Enzymol 408:390-407.
35. Burgers PM (1991) Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication factor C. II. Formation and activity of complexes with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen and with DNA polymerases δ and ε. J Biol Chem 266:22698-22706.