Linking bird, carabid beetle and butterfly life-history traits to habitat fragmentation in mosaic landscapes

Ecography

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 321-333

  Barbaro, Luc ^a   Van Halder, Inge ^a  

^a UMR 1202 BIOGECO   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; BIOGEOGRAPHY; BODY SIZE; BUTTERFLY; DISPERSAL; ENDANGERED SPECIES; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; PHENOLOGY; RARITY; REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TAXONOMY;

AVES; CARABIDAE; COLEOPTERA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 66249135989     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05546.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baguette, M. Van Dyck, H. 2007. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal Landscape Ecol. 22 : 1117 1129. (Pubitemid 47301388)
2. Barbaro, L. et al. 2007. The spatial distribution of birds and carabid beetles in pine plantation forests: the role of landscape composition and structure J. Biogeogr. 34 : 652 664. (Pubitemid 46493426)
3. Barbaro, L. et al. 2008. Multi-scale habitat selection and foraging ecology of the eurasian hoopoe (Upupa epops) in pine plantations Biodivers. Conserv. 17 : 1073 1087.
4. Bibby, C. J. et al. 2000. Bird census techniques. Academic Press.
5. Bink, F. A. 1992. Ecologische atlas van de dagvlinders van Noordwest-Europa. Schuyt and Co.
6. Cleary, D. F. R. et al. 2007. Bird species and traits associated with logged and unlogged forest in Borneo Ecol. Appl. 17 : 1184 1197.
7. Cofre, H. L. et al. 2007. Rarity in Chilean forest birds: which ecological and life-history traits matter? Divers. Distrib. 13 : 203 212.
8. Cole, L. J. et al. 2002. Relationships between agricultural management and ecological groups of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on Scottish farmland Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 93 : 323 336. (Pubitemid 35307327)
9. Cramp, S. et al. 1994. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the western Palearctic I-IX. Oxford Univ. Press.
10. Cushman, S. A. 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus Biol. Conserv. 128 : 231 240. (Pubitemid 41831429)
11. Cushman, S. A. et al. 2008. Do forest community types provide a sufficient basis to evaluate biological diversity? Front. Ecol. Environ. 6 : 13 17.
12. Davies, K. F. et al. 2000. Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81 : 1450 1461. (Pubitemid 30446178)
13. Diaz, S. Cabido, M. 2001. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 646 655. (Pubitemid 32947025)
14. Doledec, S. et al. 1996. Matching species traits to environmental variables: a new three-table ordination method Environ. Ecol. Stat. 3 : 143 166.
15. Dray, S. Dufour, A. B. 2007. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists J. Stat. Software 22 : 1 20.
16. Dray, S. et al. 2003. Co-inertia analysis and the linking of ecological data tables Ecology 84 : 3078 3089. (Pubitemid 38261454)
17. Duelli, P. Obrist, M. K. 2003. Regional biodiversity in an agricultural landscape: the contribution of seminatural habitat islands Basic Appl. Ecol. 4 : 129 138. (Pubitemid 36234298)
18. Ewers, R. M. Didham, R. K. 2006. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation Biol. Rev. 81 : 117 142. (Pubitemid 43209223)
19. Fischer, J. et al. 2006. Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes Front. Ecol. Environ. 4 : 80 86.
20. Grand, J. et al. 2004. A multiscale landscape approach to predicting bird and moth rarity hotspots in a threatened pitch pine-scrub oak community Conserv. Biol. 18 : 1063 1077. (Pubitemid 39059161)
21. Hampe, A. Petit, R. J. 2005. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters Ecol. Lett. 8 : 461 467. (Pubitemid 40641134)
22. Hausner, V. H. et al. 2003. Selecting indicator traits for monitoring land use impacts: birds in northern coastal birch forests Ecol. Appl. 13 : 999 1012. (Pubitemid 37551482)
23. Henle, K. et al. 2004. Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation Biodivers. Conserv. 13 : 207 251. (Pubitemid 38157743)
24. Holzkämper, A. et al. 2006. Optimizing landscape configuration to enhance habitat suitability for species with contrasting habitat requirements Biol. Conserv. 198 : 277 292. (Pubitemid 44416070)
25. Julliard, R. Jiguet, F. 2005. Statut de conservation en 2003 des oiseaux communs nicheurs en France selon 15 ans de programme STOC Alauda 73 : 345 356. (Pubitemid 41763798)
26. Julliard, R. et al. 2003. Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? Global Change Biol. 10 : 148 154.
27. Kotze, D. J. O'Hara, R. B. 2003. Species decline - but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe Oecologia 135 : 138 148. (Pubitemid 36400246)
28. Lafranchis, T. 2000. Les papillons de jour en France, Belgique et Luxembourg et leurs chenilles. Biotope.
29. Laiolo, P. et al. 2004. Can forest management have season-dependent effects on bird diversity? Biodivers. Conserv. 13 : 1925 1941. (Pubitemid 39059008)
30. Loreau, M. et al. 2003. Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 100 : 12765 12770. (Pubitemid 37339973)
31. McGarigal, K. et al. 2002. Fragstats: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Univ. of Massachusetts.
32. McGill, B. J. et al. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 : 178 185.
33. McKinney, M. L. Lockwood, J. L. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 : 450 453. (Pubitemid 29482273)
34. Mellado, A. et al. 2008. Biological traits of stream macroinvertebrates from a semi-arid catchment: patterns along complex environmental gradients Freshwater Biol. 53 : 1 21.
35. Ohwaki, A. et al. 2007. Butterfly assemblages in a traditional agricultural landscape: importance of secondary forests for conserving diversity, life history specialists and endemics Biodivers. Conserv. 16 : 1521 1539. (Pubitemid 46980614)
36. Paradis, E. et al. 1998. Patterns of natal and breeding dispersal in birds J. Anim. Ecol. 67 : 518 536. (Pubitemid 28351543)
37. Pollard, E. Yates, T. J. 1993. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman and Hall.
38. Purtauf, T. et al. 2005. Landscape context of organic and conventional farms: influences on carabid beetle diversity Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 108 : 165 174. (Pubitemid 40678836)
39. Rainio, J. Niemelä, J. K. 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators Biodivers. Conserv. 12 : 487 506. (Pubitemid 36280425)
40. Ribera, I. et al. 2001. Effect of land disturbance and stress on species traits of ground beetles assemblages Ecology 82 : 1112 1129. (Pubitemid 32333457)
41. Riecken, U. Raths, U. 1996. Use of radio telemetry for studying dispersal and habitat use of Carabus coriaceus L Ann. Zool. Fenn. 33 : 109 116. (Pubitemid 26375109)
42. Samways, M. J. Lu, S. S. 2007. Key traits in a threatened butterfly and its common sibling: implications for conservation Biodivers. Conserv. 16 : 4095 4107. (Pubitemid 350105394)
43. Sanderson, F. J. et al. 2006. Long-term population declines in Afro-Palearctic migrant birds Biol. Conserv. 131 : 93 105. (Pubitemid 44304418)
44. Söderström, B. et al. 2001. Grazing effects on between-year variation of farmland bird communities Ecol. Appl. 11 : 1141 1150. (Pubitemid 32731599)
45. Summerville, K. S. et al. 2006. Species traits as predictors of lepidopteran composition in restored and remnant tallgrass prairies Ecol. Appl. 16 : 891 900. (Pubitemid 44066055)
46. Tessier, F. 2000. Catalogue des Coléoptères Carabiques du Lot et Garonne Bull. Soc. Linn. Bordeaux 28 : 1 56.
47. Tscharntke, T. et al. 2002. Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland-cropland landscapes Ecol. Appl. 12 : 354 363. (Pubitemid 36516661)
48. Tscharntke, T. et al. 2008. Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems Ecology 89 : 944 951.
49. Turin, H. 2000. De Nederlandse loopkevers. Verspreiding en oecologie (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Nederlandse fauna 3. Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis.
50. van Halder, I. et al. 2008. Importance of semi-natural habitats for the conservation of butterfly communities in landscapes dominated by pine plantations Biodivers. Conserv. 17 : 1149 1169.
51. Warren, M. S. et al. 2001. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change Nature 414 : 65 69. (Pubitemid 33041623)
52. Weibull, A. C. et al. 2003. Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management Biodivers. Conserv. 12 : 1335 1355.