Species traits as predictors of lepidopteran composition in restored and remnant tallgrass prairies

Ecological Applications

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 891-900

  Summerville, Keith S ^a   Conoan, Christopher J ^a   Steichen, Renae M ^a  

^a DRAKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assembly rules; Biodiversity; Moths; Principal components analysis; Restoration ecology; Tallgrass prairie; Trait filter models

Indexed keywords

HABITAT RESTORATION; MOTH; PRAIRIE; RECOLONIZATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; LEPIDOPTERA; POACEAE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; LEPIDOPTERA; POACEAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

IOWA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 33746008798     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: 10510761     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0891:STAPOL]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bergman, K.-O., J. Askling, O. Ekberg, H. Ignell, H. Wahlman, and P. M. Milberg. 2004. Landscape effects on butterfly assemblages in an agricultural region. Ecography 27:619-629.
2. Blackburn, T. M., and K. J. Gaston. 2003. Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
3. Brändle, M., S. Öhlschläger, and R. Brändle. 2002. Range sizes in butterflies: correlation across scales. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4:993-1004.
4. Brown, J. H. 1995. Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
5. Chao, A. 1987. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783-791.
6. Chase, J. M. 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia 136:489-498.
7. Coleman, B. D., M. A. Mares, M. A. Willig, and Y.-H. Hsieh. 1983. Randomness, area, and species richness. Ecology 63:1121-1133.
8. Cornell, H. V., and J. H. Lawton. 1992. Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to species richness of ecological communities: a theoretical prospective. Journal of Animal Ecology 61:1-12.
9. Cornell, H. V., and J. O. Washburn. 1979. Evolution of the richness-area correlation for cynipid gall wasps on oak trees: a comparison of two geographic areas. Evolution 33:257-274.
10. Covell, C. V. 1983. Eastern moths. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
11. Cowley, M. J. R., C. D. Thomas, D. B. Roy, R. J. Wilson, J. L. León-Cortés, D. Gutiérrez, C. R. Bulman, R. M. Quinn, D. Moss, and K. J. Gaston. 2001. Density-distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale. Journal of Animal Ecology 70:410-426.
12. Dominick, R. B., et al. 1971-2005. The Moths of American north of Mexico. Fascicles 5.1-27.3. The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA.
13. Forbes, W. M. T. 1923. Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring states. Part 1: primitive forms. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, Ithaca, New York, USA.
14. Fukami, T. 2004. Community assembly along a species pool gradient: implications for multiple-scale patterns of species diversity. Population Ecology 46:137-147.
15. Garciá, D., and R. Zamora. 2003. Persistence, multiple demographic strategies, and conservation in long-lived Mediterranean plants. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:921-927.
16. Gaston, K. J. 1988. Patterns in the local and regional dynamics of moth populations. Oikos 53:49-57.
17. Gaston, K. J., and D. Reavey. 1989. Patterns in the life histories and feeding strategies of British macrolepidoptera. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 37:367-382.
18. Graham, M. H. 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84:2809-2815.
19. Holl, K. 1996. The effect of coal surface mine reclamation on diurnal lepidopteran conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:225-236.
20. Holt, R. D. 1993. Ecology at the mesoscale: the influence of regional processes on local communities. Pages 77-88 in R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, editors. Species diversity in ecological communities. Chicago University Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
21. Jordan, W. R., M. E. Gilpin, and J. D. Aber. 1987. Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
22. Kindscher, K., and L. L. Tieszan. 1998. Floristic and soil organic matter changes after 5 and 35 years of native tallgrass prairie restoration. Restoration Ecology 6:181-197.
23. Koh, L. P., N. S. Sodhi, and B. W. Brook. 2004. Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies. Conservation Biology 18:1571-1578.
24. Krauss, J., I. Steffan-Dewenter, and T. Tscharntke. 2003. Local species immigration, extinction, and turnover of butterflies in relation to habitat area and habitat isolation. Oecologia 137:591-603.
25. Lawton, J. H. 1990. Species richness and population dynamics of animal assemblages: patterns in body size, abundance, and space. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 330:283-291.
26. Lewis, M. N., R. M. Steichen, and K. S. Summerville. In press. The diversity of moths in tallgrass prairies of Iowa: a preliminary assessment. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science.
27. Liebold, M. A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau, and A. Gonzalez. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7:601-613.
28. Lockwood, J. L., and S. L. Pimm. 1999. When does restoration succeed? Pages 363-392 in E. Weiher and P. Keddy, editors. Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
29. Longino, J. T., J. Coddington, and R. K. Colwell. 2002. Estimating species richness in three different ways. Ecology 83:689-703.
30. Luoto, M., M. Kuussaari, H. Rita, J. Salminen, and T. von Bonsdorff. 2001. Determinants of distribution and abundance in the clouded appolo butterfly: a landscape ecological approach. Ecography 24:601-618.
31. McCune, B., and J. B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, California, USA.
32. McIntyre, N. E., and T. R. Thompson. 2003. A comparison of Conservation Reserve Program habitat plantings with respect to arthropod prey for grassland birds. American Midland Naturalist 150:291-302.
33. Metzler, E., J. A. Shuey, L. A. Berge, R. A. Henderson, and P. Z. Goldstein. 2005. Contributions to the understanding of tallgrass prairie-dependent butterflies and moths and their biogeography in the United States. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
34. Miller, W. E. 1987. Guide to the Olethreutine moths of midland North America (Tortricidae). United State Department of Agriculture, Handbook 660, Washington, D.C., USA.
35. Nagelkerke, N. J. D. 1991. A note on the general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78:691-692.
36. New, T. R. 1999. Limits to species focusing in insect conservation. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 92:853-860.
37. Novotny, V., S. E. Miller, L. Cizek, J. Leps, M. Janda, Y. Basset, G. D. Weiblen, and K. Darrow. 2003. Colonising aliens: caterpillars (Lepidoptera) feeding on Piper aduncum and P. umbellatum in rainforests of Papua New Guinea. Ecological Entomology 28:704-717.
38. Ouin, A., S. Aviron, J. Dover, and F. Burel. 2004. Complementation/ supplementation of resources for butterflies in agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 103:473-480.
39. Philippi, T. E. 1993. Multiple regression: herbivory. Pages 183-210 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
40. Piegorsch, W. W., and A. J. Bailer. 1997. Statistics for environmental biology and toxicology. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
41. Puyravaud, J.-P., C. Dufour, and A. Subramanian. 2003. Rainforest expansion mediated by successional processes in vegetation thickets in the Western Ghats of India. Journal of Biogeography 30:1067-1081.
42. Ricketts, T. H., E. Dinerstein, D. M. Olson, C. J. Loucks, W. M. Eichbaum, D. A. DellaSalla, K. C. Kavanagh, P. Hhedao, P. T. Hurley, K. M. Carney, R. A. Abell, and S. Walters. 1999. Terrestrial ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment. Island Press, Covalo, California, USA.
43. Robinson, G. S., P. R. Ackery, I. J. Kitching, G. W. Beccaloni, and L. M. Hernández. 2002. Hostplants of moth and butterfly caterpillars North of Mexico. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 69:1-824.
44. Rosburg, T. R. 2001. Iowa's prairie heritage: from the past, through the present, and into the future. Pages 1-14 in N. P. Bernstein and L. J. Ostander, editors. Proceedings of the 17th annual North American Prairie Conference. North Iowa Area Community College, Mason City, Iowa, USA.
45. SAS Institute. 2000. SAS for Windows: release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
46. Shurin, J., and D. S. Srivastava. 2004. New perspectives on local and regional diversity: beyond saturation. Pages 271-290 in M. Holyoak, M. Liebold, and R. Holt, editors. Metacommunity theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
47. Spitzer, K., M. Rejmánek, and T. Soldán. 1984. The fecundity and long-term variability in abundance of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Oecologia 62:91-93.
48. Stoner, K. J. L., and A. Joern. 2004. Landscape vs. local habitat scale influences to insect communities from tallgrass prairie remnants. Ecological Applications 14:1306-1320.
49. Summerville, K. S. 2004. Functional groups and species replacement: testing for the effects of habitat loss on moth communities. Journal of the Lepidopterists Society 58:129-132.
50. Summerville, K. S., M. J. Boulware, J. A. Veech, and T. O. Crist. 2003. Spatial patterns of lepidopteran biodiversity in eastern deciduous forests and implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 17:1045-1057.
51. Summerville, K. S., and T. O. Crist. 2003. Determinants of lepidopteran species diversity and composition in eastern deciduous forests: roles of season, region, and patch size. Oikos 100:134-148.
52. Summerville, K. S., R. M. Steichen, and M. N. Lewis. 2005. Restoring lepidopteran communities to oak savannas: contrasting influences of habitat quantity and quality. Restoration Ecology 13:120-128.
53. Temperton, V. M., R. J. Hobbs, T. Nuttle, , and S. Halle, editors. 2004. Assembly rules and restoration ecology. Island Press, Covelo, California, USA.
54. Townsend, C. R., S. Dolédec, and M. R. Scarsbrook. 1997. Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in streams: a test of habitat template theory. Freshwater Biology 37:367-387.
55. Waltz, A. E. M., and W. W. Covington. 2004. Ecological restoration treatments increase butterfly richness and abundance: mechanisms of response. Restoration Ecology 12:85-96.
56. Weiher, W., and P. Keddy. 1999. Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
57. Winter, W. D., Jr. 2000. Basic techniques for observing and studying moths and butterflies. Memoirs of the Lepidopterists Society Number 5. Lepidopterists Society, Clinton, New York, USA.
58. Yela, J. L., and M. Holyoak. 1997. Effects of moonlight and meteorological factors on light and bait trap catches of noctuid moths. Environmental Entomology 2:1283-1290.
59. Zobel, M. 1997. The relative role of species pool in determining plant species richness: an alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:266-269.
60. Zobel, M., M. Otsus, J. Liira, M. Moora, and T. Möls. 2000. Is small-scale species richness limited by seed availability or microsite availability? Ecology 81:3274-3282.