A generalized knowledge-based discriminatory function for biomolecular interactions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 115-128

  Bernard, Brady ^a   Samudrala, Ram ^b  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomolecular interactions; Complexes; Discriminatory function; Knowledge based; Protein dna; Protein ligand; Protein small molecule

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DNA; LIGANDS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 66249122733     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22323     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004;3:935-949. (Pubitemid 39529931)
2. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916. (Pubitemid 28077703)
3. Velec HF, Gohlke H, Klebe G. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. J Med Chem 2005;48:6296-6303. (Pubitemid 41428984)
4. Robertson TA, Varani G. An all-atom, distance-dependent scoring function for the prediction of protein-DNA interactions from structure. Proteins 2007;66:359-374. (Pubitemid 46053467)
5. Huang S-Y, Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition. Proteins 2008;72:557-579.
6. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883. (Pubitemid 20213222)
7. Sippl MJ. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1993;7:473-501.
8. Chandler D. Introduction to modern statistical mechanics. USA: Oxford University Press, 1987. p 197.
9. Allen FH. The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of amillion crystal structures and rising. Acta Crystallogr B 2002;58(3, Part 1):380-388. (Pubitemid 135702674)
10. Bruno IJ, Cole JC, Edgington PR, Kessler M, Macrae CF, McCabe P, Pearson J, Taylor R. New software for searching the Cambridge Structural Database and visualizing crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr B 2002;58(3, Part 1):389-397. (Pubitemid 135702675)
11. Potterton L, McNicholas S, Krissinel E, Gruber J, Cowtan K, Emsley P, Murshudov GN, Cohen S, Perrakis A, Noble M. Developments in the CCP4 molecular-graphics project. Acta Crystallogr D 2004;60(12, Part 1):2288-2294. (Pubitemid 41742782)
12. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucl Acids Res 2000;28:235-242. (Pubitemid 30047768)
13. Meng EC, Lewis RA. Determination of molecular topology and atomic hybridization states from heavy atom coordinates. J Comput Chem 1991;12:891-898.
14. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605-1612.
15. Bondi A. van der Waals Volumes and Radii. J Phys Chem 1964;68:441-451.
16. Rowland RS, Taylor R. Intermolecular nonbonded contact distances in organic crystal structures: Comparison with distances expected from van der Waals radii. J Phys Chem 1996;100:7384-7391. (Pubitemid 126789411)
17. Zhang J, Wang R. (Available at http://sw16.im.med.umich.edu/software/ xtool/) [Accessed 1 February 2008].
18. Wang R, Lu Y, Wang S. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. J Med Chem 2003;46:2287-2303. (Pubitemid 36637914)
19. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 1998;19:1639-1662. (Pubitemid 128590223)
20. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhu Q, Zhou Y. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. J Med Chem 2005;48:2325-2335. (Pubitemid 40516427)
21. Huang S-Y, Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: II. Validation of the scoring function. J Comput Chem 2006;27:1876-1882. (Pubitemid 44672569)
22. Robertson TA, Varani G. (Available at http://depts.washington.edu/ varani2/downloads/index.shtml) [Accessed 5 February 2008].
23. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120. (Pubitemid 27395541)
24. Wang K, Horst JA, Cheng G, Nickle DC, Samudrala R. Protein meta-functional signatures from combining sequence, structure, evolution and amino acid property information. PLoS Comput Biol 2008;4:e1000181.
25. Laurie ATR, Jackson RM. Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics 2005;21:1908-1916. (Pubitemid 40668026)
26. Kozakov D, Brenke R, Comeau SR, Vajda S. PIPER: an FFT-based protein docking program with pairwise potentials. Proteins 2006;65:392-406. (Pubitemid 44454112)
27. Mintseris J, Pierce B, Wiehe K, Anderson R, Chen R, Weng Z. Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins 2007;69:511-520. (Pubitemid 47628683)