Hydrogen bonding, electrostatic potential, and molecular design

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1234-1244

  Kenny, Peter W ^a  

^a ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; ATOMS; ELECTROSTATICS; VAN DER WAALS FORCES;

CALCULATED VALUES; ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS; HYDROGEN-BOND FORMATION; INTERACTING MOLECULES; MOLECULAR ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS; POLARIZABLE FORCE FIELD; SELF-ASSOCIATIONS; VAN DER WAALS RADIUS;

HYDROGEN BONDS;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DRUG DESIGN; HYDROGEN BOND; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

DRUG DESIGN; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

EID: 66249086550     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci9000234     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Latimer, W. M.; Rodebush, W. H. Polarity and ionization from the standpoint of the Lewis theory of valence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1920, 42, 1419-1433.
2. Pimental, G. C.; McClellan, A. L. The Hydrogen Bond; Freeman: San Francisco, 1960.
3. Jeffrey, G. A. An Introduction to Hydrogen Bonding; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1997.
4. Etter, M. C. Encoding and decoding hydrogen-bond patterns of organic compounds. Acc.Chem Res. 1990, 23, 120-126.
5. Bernstein, J.; Davis, R. E.; Shimoni, L.; Chang, N.-L. Patterns in hydrogen bonding: functionality and graph set analysis in crystals. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1555-1573.
6. Karamertzanis, P. G.; Day, G. M.; Welch, G. W. A.; Kendrick, J.; Leusen, F. J. J.; Neumann, M. A.; Price, S. L. Modeling the interplay of inter-and intramolecular hydrogen bonding in conformational polymorphs. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 244708/1-244708/17.
7. Watson, J. D.; Crick, F. H. C. Molecular structure of nucleic acids. A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature (London) 1953, 171. 737-738.
8. Franklin, R. E.; Gosling, R. G. Molecular configuration in sodium thymonucleate. Nature (London) 1953, 171, 740-741.
9. Pauling, L.; Corey, R. B.; Branson, H. R. The structure of proteins: two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1951, 37, 205-11.
10. Pauling, L.; Corey, R. B. Configurations of polypeptide chains with favored orientations around single bonds: two new pleated sheets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1951, 37, 729-40.
11. Baker, E. N.; Hubbard, R. E. Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 1984, 44, 97-179.
12. Powers, E. T.; Deechongkit, S.; Kelly, J. W. Backbone-backbone H-bonds make context-dependent contributions to protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics: lessons from amide-to-ester mutations. Adv. Protein Chem. 2006, 72, 39-78.
13. Baldwin, R. L. Energetics of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 371, 283-301.
14. Dill, K. A.; Ozkan, S. B.; Shell, M. S.; Weikl, T. R. The protein folding problem. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2008, 37, 289-316.
15. Wells, T. N. C.; Fersht, A. R. Hydrogen bonding in enzymatic catalysis analyzed by protein engineering. Nature London) 1985, 316, 566-657.
16. Schowen, K. B.; Limbach, H.-H.; Denisov, G. S.; Schowen, R. L. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1458, 43-62.
17. Kauzmann, W. Some factors in the interpretation of protein denatur-ation. Adv. Protein Chem. 1959, 14, 1-63.
18. Tanford, C. The Hydrophobic Effect, 2nd ed.; John Wiley: New York, 1980.
19. Tanford, C. How protein chemists learned about the hydrophobic factor. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 1358-1366.
20. Southall, N. T.; Dill, K. A.; Haymet, A. D. J. A view of the hydrophobic effect. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 521-533.
21. Taft, R. W.; Gurka, D.; Joris, L.; Schleyer, P. v R.; Rakshys, J. W. Studies of hydrogen-bonded complex formation with p-fluorophenol. V. Linear free energy relationships with OH reference acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 4801-8.
22. Kamlet, M. J.; Taft, R. W. The solvatochromic comparison method. I. The /3-scale of solvent hydrogen-bond acceptor (HBA) basicities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 377-383.
23. Abraham, M. H. Scales of solute hydrogen-bonding: their construction and application to physicochemical and biochemical processes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 22, 73-83.
24. Laurence, C.; Berthelot, M. Observations on the strength of hydrogen bonding. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 2000, 18, 39-60.
25. Abraham, M. H.; Duce, P. D.; Prior, D. V.; Barratt, D. G.; Morris, J. J.; Taylor, P. J. Hydrogen bonding. Part 9. Solute proton-donor and proton-acceptor scales for use in drug design. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1989, 1355-1375.
26. Seiler, P. Interconversion of lipophilicites from hydrocarbon/water systems into the octanol/water system. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1974, 9, 473-479.
27. Young, R. C.; Mitchell, R. C.; Brown, T. H.; Ganellin, C. R.; Griffiths, Jones, R. M.; Rana, K.K.; Saunders, D.; Smith, I. R.; Sore, N.; Wilks, T. J. Development of a new physicochemical model for brain penetration and its application to the design of centrally acting H2 receptor histamine antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 656-671.
28. Abraham, M. H.; Chadha, H. S.; Whiting, G. S.; Mitchell, R. C. Hydrogen bonding. 32. An analysis of water-octanol and water-alkane partitioning and the AlogP parameter of Seiler. J. Pharm. Sci. 1994, 83, 1085-1100.
29. Toulmin, A.; Wood, J. M.; Kenny, P. W. Toward Prediction of Alkane/ Water Partition Coefficients. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 3720-30.
30. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 1997, 23, 3-25.
31. Palm, K.; Luthman, K.; Ungell, A.-L.; Strandlund, G.; Artursson, P. Correlation of Drug Absorption with Molecular Surface Properties. J. Pharm. Sci. 1996, 85, 32-39.
32. Warren, G. L.; Andrews, C. W.; Capelli, A.-M.; Clarke, B.; LaLonde, J.; Lambert, M. H.; Lindvall, M.; Nevins, N.; Semus, S. F.; Senger, S.; Tedesco, G.; Wall, I. D.; Woolven, J. M.; Peishoff, C. E.; Head, M. S. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5912-5931.
33. Walters, W. P.; Stahl, M. T.; Murcko, M. A. Virtual screening-an overview. Drug Discovery Today 1998, 3, 160-178.
34. Bayly, C. I.; Cieplak, P.; Cornell, W.; Kollman, P. A. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 10269-80.
35. Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
36. Murray, J. S.; Ranganathan, S.; Politzer, P. Correlations between the solvent hydrogen bond acceptor parameter β and the calculated molecular electrostatic potential. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 3734-3739.
37. Kenny, P. W. Prediction of hydrogen bond basicity from computed molecular electrostatic properties: implications for comparative molecular field analysis. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 199-202.
38. Murray, J. S.; Politzer, P. Correlations between the solvent hydrogen-bond-donating parameter R and the calculated molecular surface electrostatic potential. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 6715-17.
39. Hunter, C. A. Quantifying intermolecular interactions: Guidelines for the molecular recognition toolbox. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5310-5324.
40. Lamarche, O.; Platts, J. A. Complementary nature of hydrogen bond basicity and acidity scales from electrostatic and atoms in molecules properties. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 677-684.
41. Boys, S. F.; Bernadi, F. The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors. Mol. Phys. 1970, 19, 553-566.
42. Simon, S.; Duran, M.; Dannenberg, J. J. How does basis set superposition error change the potential surfaces for hydrogen-bonded dimers. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 11024-11031.
43. Kangas, E.; Tidor, B. Electrostatic Complementarity at Ligand Binding Sites: Application to Chorismate Mutase. J. Phys. Chem. 2001, 105, 880-888.
44. Abraham, M. H.; Duce, P. P.; Morris, J. J.; Taylor, P. J. Hydrogen bonding. Part 2. Equilibrium constants and enthalpies of complexation for 72 monomeric hydrogen-bond acids with N-methylpyrrolidinone in 1,1,1- trichloroethane. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1987, 83, 2867-2881.
45. Morris, J. J.; Hughes, L. R.; Glen, A. T.; Taylor, P. J. Non-steroidal antiandrogens. Design of novel compounds based on an infrared study of the dominant conformation and hydrogen-bonding properties of a series of anilide antiandrogens. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 447-455.
46. Gaussian 03, Revision B.05; Gaussian Inc.: 340 Quinnipiac St. Bldg 40, Wallingford, CT 06492, USA. http://www.gaussian.com (accessed Mar 11, 2009).
47. Szabo, A.; Ostlund, N. S. Modern Quantum Chemistry. Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory; Dover: Mineola, 1996.
48. Ditchfield, R.; Hehre, W. J.; Pople, J. A. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. IX. Extended Gaussian-type basis for molecular-orbital studies of organic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 724-728.
49. Frisch, M. J.; Pople, J. A.; Binkley, J. S. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian basis sets. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 3265-3269.
50. Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
51. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev.B1988, 3, 785-789.
52. M0ller, C.; Plesset, M. S. Note on the approximation treatment for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. 1934, 46, 618-622.
53. Frisch, M. J.; Head-Gordon, M.; Pople, J. A. A direct MP2 gradient method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 166, 275-280.
54. Spitznagel, G. W.; Clark, T.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Schleyer, P. v R. Stabilization of methyl anions by first-row substituents. The superiority of diffuse function-augmented basis sets for anion calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1982, 3, 363-71.
55. Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650-4.
56. JMP Version 6.0.0; SAS Institute: SAS Campus Drive, Building S,Cary, NC 27513, USA. http://www.jmp.com (accessed Mar 11, 2009).
57. Bondi, A. Van der Waals volumes and radii. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 441-451.
58. Serjeant, E. P.; Dempsey, B. Ionisation Constants ofOrganic Acids in Aqueous Solution; Pergamon: Oxford, 1979.
59. Jorgensen, W. L.; Pranata, J. Importance of secondary interactions in triply hydrogen bonded complexes: guanine-cytosine vs uracil-2,6- diaminopyridine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2008-10.
60. Elguero, J.; Marzin, C.; Katritzky, A. R.; Linda, P. The Tautomerism of Heterocycles; Academic Press: New York, 1976.
61. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. The prediction of ADMET properties using structure information representations. Chem. Biodiversity 2005, 2, 1428-1437.
62. Prokopenko, N. A.; Bethea, I. A.; Clemens, C. J.; Klimek, A.; Wargo, K.; Spivey, C.; Waziri, K.; Grushow, A. The effect of structure on hydrogen bonding: Hydrogen bonded lactam dimers in CCl4. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 490-495.
63. Johnson, R. A.; Wichern, D. W. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis; Prentice Hall International: Englewood Cliffs, 1988.
64. Hammett, L. P. Effect of structure upon the reactions of organic compounds. Benzene derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 96-103.
65. Seela, F.; Driller, H. Alternating d(G-C)3 and d(C-G)3 hexanucleotides containing 7-deaza-2'-deoxyguanosine or 8-aza-7-deaza-2'-deoxygua-nosine in place of dG. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 901-910.
66. Ganguly, M.; Wang, F.; Kaushik, M.; Stone, M. P.; Marky, L. A.;Gold, B. A study of 7-deaza-2'-deoxyguanosine-2'-deoxycytidine base pairing in DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 6181-6195.
67. Saiki, R. K.; Gelfand, D. H.; Stoffel, S.; Scharf, S. J.; Higuchi, R.;Horn, G. T.; Mullis, K. B.; Erlich, H. A. Primer-directed enzymic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 1988, 239, 487-91.
68. Bachmann, H. S.; Siffert, W.; Frey, U. H. Successful amplification of extremely GC-rich promoter regions using a novel 'slowdown PCR' technique. Pharmacogenetics 2003, 13, 759-766.
69. Gold, B.; Marky, L. M.; Stone, M. P.; Williams, L. D. A review of the role of the sequence-dependent electrostatic landscape in DNA alkylation patterns. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 1402-1414.
70. Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Cole, J. C.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Murray, C. W.; Nissink, J. W. M.; Taylor, R. D.; Taylor, R. Modeling Water Molecules in Protein-Ligand Docking Using GOLD. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 6504-6515.
71. Young, T.; Abel, R.; Kim, B.; Berne, B. J.; Friesner, R. A. Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein-ligand binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 808-813.
72. Maple, J. R.; Cao, Y.; Damm, W.; Halgren, T. A.; Kaminski, G. A.; Zhang, L. Y.; Friesner, R. A. A Polarizable Force Field and Continuum Solvation Methodology for Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2005, 1, 694-715.
73. Xie, W.; Pu, J.; MacKerell, A. D.; Gao, J. Development of a Polarizable Intermolecular Potential Function (PIPF) for Liquid Amides and Alkanes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 1878-1889.
74. Ceccarelli, C.; Jeffrey, G. A.; Taylor, R. A survey of O-H..O hydrogen bond geometries determined by neutron diffraction. J. Mol. Struct. Phys. Chem. 1981, 70, 255-271.
75. Lomas, J. S.; Maurel, F. Water and alcohol(s): what's the difference? A proton NMR and DFT study of hetero-association with pyridine. J.Phys. Org. Chem. 2008, 21, 464-471.
76. Thornber, C. W. Isosterism and molecular modification in drug design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1979, 8, 563-80.
77. Patani, G. A.; LaVoie, E. J. Bioisosterism: A rational approach in drug design. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3147-3176.
78. Sheridan, R. P. The most common chemical replacements in drug-like compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 103-108.
79. Herr, R. J. 5-Substituted 1H-tetrazoles as carboxylic acid isosteres: medicinal chemistry and synthetic methods. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 3379-3393.
80. Birch, A. M.; Kenny, P. W.; Simpson, I.; Whittamore, P. R. O. Matched molecular pair analysis of activity and properties of glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 850-853.
81. Grant, J. A.; Pickup, B. T.; Nicholls, A. A smooth permittivity function for Poisson-Boltzmann solvation methods. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 608-640.
82. Klamt, A.; Jonas, V. Treatment of the outlying charge in continuum solvation models. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 9972-9981.
83. Still, W. C.; Tempczyk, A.; Hawley, R. C.; Hendrickson, T. Semi-analytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 90, 6127-6129.
84. Gilson, M. K.; Honig, B. H. Energetics of charge-charge interactions in proteins. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 1988, 3, 32-52.
85. Mobley, D. L.; Barber, A. E.; Fennell, C. J.; Dill, K. A. Charge asymmetries in hydration of polar solutes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 2405-2414.
86. Fujita, T.; Iwasa, J.; Hansch, C. A new substituent constant, n, derived from partition coefficients. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 5175-5180.
87. Marenich, A. V.; Olson, R. M.; Kelly, C. P.; Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Self-consistent reaction field model for aqueous and nonaqueous solutions based on accurate polarized partial charges. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 2011-2033.
88. Klamt, A.; Eckert, F. COSMO-RS: a novel and efficient method for the a priori prediction of thermophysical data of liquids. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2000, 172, 43-72.
89. Cox, S. R.; Williams, D. E. Representation of the molecular electrostatic potential by a net atomic charge model. J. Comput. Chem. 1981, 2, 304-323.