The power of causal beliefs and conflicting evidence on causal judgments and decision making

Learning and Motivation

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 284-297

  Garcia Retamero, Rocio ^a   Müller, Stephanie M ^a   Catena, Andrés ^a   Maldonado, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Causal attribution; Causal learning; Decision making; Learning; Search processes; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 66049123054     PISSN: 00239690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2009.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alba J.W., Broniarczyk S.M., Shimp T.A., and Urbany J.E. The influence of prior beliefs, frequency cues, and magnitude cues on consumers' perceptions of comparative price data. The Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1994) 219-235
2. Ahn W., and Kalish C.W. The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning. In: Keil F.C., and Wilson R.A. (Eds). Explanation and cognition (2000), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 199-225
3. Ahn W., Kalish C.W., Medin D.L., and Gelman S.A. The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attribution. Cognition 54 (1995) 299-352
4. Alloy L.B., and Tabachnik N. Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 112-149
5. Baumgartner H. On the utility of consumers' theories in judgments of covariation. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1995) 634-643
6. Billman D., Bornstein B.H., and Richards J. Effects of expectancy on assessing covariation in data: "Prior belief" versus "meaning". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 53 (1992) 74-88
7. Catena A., Maldonado A., and Cándido A. The effect of the frequency of judgment and the type of trials on covariation learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 481-495
8. Catena A., Maldonado A., Perales J.C., and Cándido A. Interaction between previous beliefs and cue predictive value in covariation-based causal induction. Acta Psychologica 128 (2008) 339-349
9. Chapman L.J., and Chapman J.P. Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 72 (1967) 193-204
10. Chapman L.J., and Chapman J.P. Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid diagnostic signs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 74 (1969) 271-280
11. Cheng P.W. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 367-405
12. Evans J.St.B.T., Clibbens J., Cattani A., Harris A., and Dennis I. Explicit and implicit processes in multicue judgment. Memory & Cognition 31 (2003) 608-618
13. Evans J.St.B.T., Clibbens J., and Harris A. Prior belief and polarity in multicue learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A (2005) 651-665
14. Fiedler K. Illusory correlations: A simple associative algorithm provides a convergent account of seemingly divergent paradigms. Review of General Psychology 4 (2000) 25-58
15. Fugelsang J.A., and Thompson V.A. A dual-process model of belief and evidence interactions in causal reasoning. Memory & Cognition 31 (2003) 800-815
16. Fugelsang J.A., Stein C.B., Green A.E., and Dunbar K.N. Theory and data interactions in the scientific mind: Evidence from molecular and the cognitive laboratory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (2004) 86-95
17. Garcia-Retamero R. The influence of knowledge about causal mechanisms on compound processing. The Psychological Record 57 (2007) 295-306
18. Garcia-Retamero R., and Dhami M.K. Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 16 (2009) 163-169
19. Garcia-Retamero R., and Hoffrage U. How causal knowledge simplifies decision making. Minds & Machines. Special Volume on Causality, Uncertainty and Ignorance 16 (2006) 365-380
20. Garcia-Retamero R., and Hoffrage U. Influencia del conocimiento causal en los procesos de toma de decisiones. Revista Mexicana de Psicología 26 (2009) 103-111
21. Garcia-Retamero R., Hoffrage U., and Dieckmann A. When one cue is not enough: Combining fast and frugal heuristics with compound cue processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (2007) 1197-1215
22. Garcia-Retamero R., Hoffrage U., Dieckmann A., and Ramos M. Compound cue processing within the fast and frugal heuristic approach in non-linearly separable environments. Learning & Motivation 38 (2007) 16-34
23. Garcia-Retamero R., Takezawa M., and Gigerenzer G. Group communication and decision making strategies. Psicothema 20 (2008) 753-759
24. Garcia-Retamero, R., Takezawa, M., & Gigerenzer, G. (in press). Does imitation benefit cue order learning? Experimental Psychology.
25. Garcia-Retamero R., Wallin A., and Dieckmann A. Does causal knowledge help us be faster and more frugal in our decisions?. Memory & Cognition 35 (2007) 1399-1409
26. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U., and Kleinbölting H. Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review 98 (1991) 506-528
27. Gigerenzer G., and Goldstein D.G. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 103 (1996) 650-669
28. Gigerenzer G., Todd P.M., and The ABC Research Group. Simple heuristics that make us smart (1999), Oxford University Press, New York
29. Griffiths T.L., and Tenenbaum J.B. Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology 51 (2005) 334-384
30. Hogan D.J. The prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis. Occupational Medicine 9 (1994) 5358
31. Hogarth R.M., and Einhorn H.J. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology 24 (1992) 1-55
32. Klayman J. Varieties of confirmation bias. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 32 (1995) 385-417
33. Koehler D.J., and Harvey N. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (2004), Blackwell, Oxford, UK
34. Lien Y., and Cheng P.W. Distinguishing genuine from spurious causes: A coherence hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology 40 (2000) 87-137
35. Maldonado A., Catena A., Cándido A., and Garcia I. The belief revision model: Assymmetrical effects of noncontingency on human covariation learning. Learning & Behavior 27 (1999) 168-180
36. Newell B.R., Lagnado D.A., and Shanks D.R. Straight choices: The psychology of decision making (2007), Psychology Press, Hove, UK
37. Nisbett R.E., and Ross L. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment (1980), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
38. Perales J.C., and Catena A. Human causal induction: A glimpse at the whole picture. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18 (2006) 277-320
39. Perales J.C., Catena A., and Maldonado A. Inferring non-observed correlations from causal scenarios: The role of causal knowledge. Learning and Motivation 35 (2004) 115-135
40. Perales J.C., Catena A., Maldonado A., and Cándido A. The role of mechanism and covariation information in causal belief updating. Cognition 105 (2007) 704-714
41. Spellman B.A. Acting as intuitive scientists: Contingency judgments are made while controlling for alternative potential causes. Psychological Science 7 (1996) 337-342
42. Spellman B.A., Price C.M., and Logan J.M. How two causes are different from one: The use of (un)conditional information in Simpson's paradox. Memory & Cognition 29 (2001) 193-208
43. Waldmann M.R., and Holyoak K.J. Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121 (1992) 222-236
44. Wason P.C. Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (1968) 273-281
45. White P.A. A theory of causal processing. British Journal of Psychology 80 (1989) 431454
46. Wright J.C., and Murphy G.L. The utility of theories in intuitive statistics: The robustness of theory-based judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1984) 301-322