Explicit and implicit processes in multicue judgment

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 608-618

  Evans, Jonathan St B T ^a   Clibbens, John ^a   Cattani, Allegra ^a   Harris, Anita ^a   Dennis, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; SELF REPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0037972444     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196101     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ADELMAN, L. (1981). The influence of formal, substantive and contextual task properties on relative effectiveness of different forms of feedback in multiple-cue probability learning tasks. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 27, 423-442.
2. BALZER, W. K., DOHERTY, M. E., & O'CONNER, R., JR. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 410-433.
3. BERRY, D. C., & DIENES, Z. (1993). Implicit learning. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
4. BREHMER, B. (1974). Hypotheses about relations between scaled variables and the learning of probabilistic inference tasks. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 11, 1-27.
5. BREHMER, B. (1980). In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psychologica, 45, 233-241.
6. COOKSEY, R. W. (1996). The methodology of social judgement theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 141-173.
7. DIENES, Z., & PERNER, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 735-808.
8. DOHERTY, M. E., & KURZ, E. M. (1996). Social judgement theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 109-140.
9. EVANS, J. ST. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
10. EVANS, J. ST. B. T., BARSTON, J. L., & POLLARD, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11, 295-306.
11. EVANS, J. ST. B. T., & OVER, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
12. GILOVICH, T., & GRIFFIN, D. (2002). Introduction - Heuristics and biases: Then and now. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. GOEL, V., BUCHEL, C., FRITH, C., & DOLAN, R. J. (2000). Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning. NeuroImage, 12, 504-514.
14. HARRIES, C., EVANS, J. ST. B. T., & DENNIS, I. (2000). Measuring doctors' self-insight into their treatment decisions. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 455-477.
15. HARRIES, C., EVANS, J. ST. B. T, DENNIS, I., & DEAN, J. (1996). A clinical judgement analysis of prescribing decisions in general practice. Le Travail Humain, 59, 87-111.
16. KAHNEMAN, D., & FREDERICK, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (pp, 49-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. KLAYMAN, J. (1994). Learning from feedback in probabilistic environments. Acta Psychologica, 56, 81-92.
18. KLAYMAN, J., & HA, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
19. LINDELL, M. K. (1976). Cognitive and outcome feedback in multiplecue probability learning tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 739-745.
20. NISBETT, R. E., & WILSON, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-295.
21. REBER, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. REILLY, B. A., & DOHERTY, M. E. (1992). The assessment of self-insight in judgment policies. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 53, 285-309.
23. SLOMAN, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
24. SLOMAN, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (pp. 379-398). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. STANOVICH, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. STANOVICH, K. E., & WEST, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342-357.
27. STEWART, T. R. (1988). Judgement analysis: Procedures. In B. Brehmer & C. R. B. Joyce (Eds.), Human judgement: The SJT view (pp. 41-74). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
28. TAYLOR, L. A., HALL, P. D., COSIER, R. A., & GOODWIN, V. L. (1996). Outcome feedback effects on risk propensity in an MCPLP task. Journal of Management, 22, 299-311.
29. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A. (2002). Two routes to remembering (and another to remembering not). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 325-348.
30. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & BROOKS, L. R. (1990, November). Factors affecting reliance on analytic and nonanalytic knowledge. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
31. WIGTON, R. S. (1996). Social judgement theory and medical judgement. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 175-190.
32. YORK, K. M., DOHERTY, M. E., & KAMOURI, J. (1987). The influence of cue unreliability on judgment in a multiple cue probability learning task. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 39, 303-317.