Translational control from head to tail

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 444-451

  Groppo, Rachel ^a   Richter, Joel D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELONGATION FACTOR; INITIATION FACTOR; INITIATION FACTOR 4E; INITIATION FACTOR 4E BINDING PROTEIN; INITIATION FACTOR 4G; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN;

BINDING AFFINITY; DEVELOPMENT; GENE CONTROL; GENE REPRESSION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MITOSIS; NEOPLASM; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RNA TRANSLATION; STOP CODON; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TRANSLATION INITIATION;

ANIMALS; CODON, TERMINATOR; PEPTIDE CHAIN INITIATION, TRANSLATIONAL; PEPTIDE CHAIN TERMINATION, TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS; RNA CAPS; RNA, MESSENGER;

EID: 66049084037     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.011     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Sutton M.A., Taylor A.M., Ito H.T., Pham A., and Schuman E.M. Postsynaptic decoding of neural activity: eEF2 as a biochemical sensor coupling miniature synaptic transmission to local protein synthesis. Neuron 55 (2007) 648-661. This paper shows that the phosphorylation state of eEF2 changes depending on the type of synaptic transmission (that is action potential-dependent or independent (miniature synaptic transmissions)). Moreover, there was a tight correlation between the amount of eEF2 phosphorylation and translation of a reporter mRNA.
2. Steward O., and Schuman E.M. Protein synthesis at synaptic sites on dendrites. Annu Rev Neurosci 24 (2001) 299-325
3. ••], this paper illustrates translation inhibition of a specific mRNA in Drosophila by 4E-HP simultaneously binding both the cap of the mRNA and the protein bound to sequences in the mRNA 3′UTR.
4. ••].
5. Sonenberg N., and Hinnebusch A.G. New modes of translational control in development, behavior, and disease. Mol Cell 28 (2007) 721-729
6. Besse F., and Ephrussi A. Translational control of localized mRNAs: restricting protein synthesis in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9 (2008) 971-980
7. Mathews M.B., Sonenberg N., and Hershey J.W.B. Origins and principles of translational control. In: Mathews M.B., Sonenberg N., and Hershey J.W.B. (Eds). Translational Control in Biology and Medicine (2007), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 1-40
8. Pestova T.V., Lorsch J.R., and Hellen C.U. The mechanism of translation initiation in eukaryotes. In: Mathews M.B., Sonenberg N., and Hershey J.W.B. (Eds). Translational Control in Biology and Medicine (2007), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 87-128
9. Majumdar R., Bandyopadhyay A., and Maitra U. Mammalian translation initiation factor eIF1 functions with eIF1A and eIF3 in the formation of a stable 40 S preinitiation complex. J Biol Chem 278 (2003) 6580-6587
10. Chaudhuri J., Chowdhury D., and Maitra U. Distinct functions of eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1A and eIF3 in the formation of the 40 S ribosomal preinitiation complex. J Biol Chem 274 (1999) 17975-17980
11. Lamphear B.J., Kirchweger R., Skern T., and Rhoads R.E. Mapping of functional domains in eukaryotic protein synthesis initiation factor 4G (eIF4G) with picornaviral proteases. Implications for cap-dependent and cap-independent translational initiation. J Biol Chem 270 (1995) 21975-21983
12. Pisareva V.P., Pisarev A.V., Komar A.A., Hellen C.U., and Pestova T.V. Translation initiation on mammalian mRNAs with structured 5′UTRs requires DExH-box protein DHX29. Cell 135 (2008) 1237-1250. This paper shows the protein DHX29, a putative DExH helicase, is part of the preinitiation complex, which is necessary for 48S complex scanning of mRNAs with highly structured 5′UTRs.
13. Gingras A.C., Raught B., and Sonenberg N. eIF4 initiation factors: effectors of mRNA recruitment to ribosomes and regulators of translation. Annu Rev Biochem 68 (1999) 913-963
14. Pestova T.V., Borukhov S.I., and Hellen C.U. Eukaryotic ribosomes require initiation factors 1 and 1A to locate initiation codons. Nature 394 (1998) 854-859
15. Pestova T.V., and Kolupaeva V.G. The roles of individual eukaryotic translation initiation factors in ribosomal scanning and initiation codon selection. Genes Dev 16 (2002) 2906-2922
16. Taylor D.J., Frank J., and Kinzy T.G. Structure and function of the eukaryotic ribosome and elongation factors. In: Mathews M.B., Sonenberg N., and Hershey J.W.B. (Eds). Translational Control in Biology and Medicine (2007), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 59-86
17. Fan-Minogue H., Du M., Pisarev A.V., Kallmeyer A.K., Salas-Marco J., Keeling K.M., Thompson S.R., Pestova T.V., and Bedwell D.M. Distinct eRF3 requirements suggest alternate eRF1 conformations mediate peptide release during eukaryotic translation termination. Mol Cell 30 (2008) 599-609
18. Ehrenberg M., Hauryliuk V., Crist C.G., and Nakamura Y. Translation termination, the prion [PSI+], and ribosomal recycling. In: Mathews M.B., Sonenberg N., and Hershey J.W.B. (Eds). Translational Control in Biology and Medicine (2007), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 173-196
19. Raught B., and Gingras A.C. Signaling to translation initiation. In: Mathews M.B., Sonenberg N., and Hershey J.W.B. (Eds). Translational Control in Biology and Medicine (2007), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 369-400
20. Redpath N.T., Price N.T., Severinov K.V., and Proud C.G. Regulation of elongation factor-2 by multisite phosphorylation. Eur J Biochem 213 (1993) 689-699
21. Ryazanov A.G., Shestakova E.A., and Natapov P.G. Phosphorylation of elongation factor 2 by EF-2 kinase affects rate of translation. Nature 334 (1988) 170-173
22. Richter J.D., and Sonenberg N. Regulation of cap-dependent translation by eIF4E inhibitory proteins. Nature 433 (2005) 477-480
23. Pyronnet S., Dostie J., and Sonenberg N. Suppression of cap-dependent translation in mitosis. Genes Dev 15 (2001) 2083-2093
24. Stebbins-Boaz B., Cao Q., de Moor C.H., Mendez R., and Richter J.D. Maskin is a CPEB-associated factor that transiently interacts with elF-4E. Mol Cell 4 (1999) 1017-1027
25. Jung M.Y., Lorenz L., and Richter J.D. Translational control by neuroguidin, a eukaryotic initiation factor 4E and CPEB binding protein. Mol Cell Biol 26 (2006) 4277-4287
26. Nakamura A., Sato K., and Hanyu-Nakamura K. Drosophila cup is an eIF4E binding protein that associates with Bruno and regulates oskar mRNA translation in oogenesis. Dev Cell 6 (2004) 69-78
27. Napoli I., Mercaldo V., Boyl P.P., Eleuteri B., Zalfa F., De Rubeis S., Di Marino D., Mohr E., Massimi M., Falconi M., et al. The fragile X syndrome protein represses activity-dependent translation through CYFIP1, a new 4E-BP. Cell 134 (2008) 1042-1054. This paper describes a new 4E-BP, CYFIP1, which interacts with both eIF4E and 3′UTR bound FMRP to repress translation of FMRP bound mRNAs. It also suggests how CYFIP1 can bind eIF4E even though it lacks the canonical YXXXXLΦ motif.
28. Richter J.D. CPEB: a life in translation. Trends Biochem Sci 32 (2007) 279-285
29. Cao Q., Kim J.H., and Richter J.D. CDK1 and calcineurin regulate Maskin association with eIF4E and translational control of cell cycle progression. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13 (2006) 1128-1134
30. Kim J.H., and Richter J.D. Opposing polymerase-deadenylase activities regulate cytoplasmic polyadenylation. Mol Cell 24 (2006) 173-183
31. Barnard D.C., Ryan K., Manley J.L., and Richter J.D. Symplekin and xGLD-2 are required for CPEB-mediated cytoplasmic polyadenylation. Cell 119 (2004) 641-651
32. Barnard D.C., Cao Q., and Richter J.D. Differential phosphorylation controls Maskin association with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E and localization on the mitotic apparatus. Mol Cell Biol 25 (2005) 7605-7615
33. Marcotrigiano J., Gingras A.C., Sonenberg N., and Burley S.K. Cap-dependent translation initiation in eukaryotes is regulated by a molecular mimic of eIF4G. Mol Cell 3 (1999) 707-716
34. Rom E., Kim H.C., Gingras A.C., Marcotrigiano J., Favre D., Olsen H., Burley S.K., and Sonenberg N. Cloning and characterization of 4EHP, a novel mammalian eIF4E-related cap-binding protein. J Biol Chem 273 (1998) 13104-13109
35. Dubnau J., and Struhl G. RNA recognition and translational regulation by a homeodomain protein. Nature 379 (1996) 694-699
36. Rivera-Pomar R., Niessing D., Schmidt-Ott U., Gehring W.J., and Jackle H. RNA binding and translational suppression by bicoid. Nature 379 (1996) 746-749
37. Niessing D., Blanke S., and Jackle H. Bicoid associates with the 5′-cap-bound complex of caudal mRNA and represses translation. Genes Dev 16 (2002) 2576-2582
38. Struhl G., Johnston P., and Lawrence P.A. Control of Drosophila body pattern by the hunchback morphogen gradient. Cell 69 (1992) 237-249
39. Edwards T.A., Wilkinson B.D., Wharton R.P., and Aggarwal A.K. Model of the brain tumor-Pumilio translation repressor complex. Genes Dev 17 (2003) 2508-2513
40. Sonoda J., and Wharton R.P. Recruitment of Nanos to hunchback mRNA by Pumilio. Genes Dev 13 (1999) 2704-2712
41. Ostareck D.H., Ostareck-Lederer A., Shatsky I.N., and Hentze M.W. Lipoxygenase mRNA silencing in erythroid differentiation: the 3′UTR regulatory complex controls 60S ribosomal subunit joining. Cell 104 (2001) 281-290. This paper was the first to describe the inhibition of 60S subunit joining to the 40S by proteins bound to the 3′UTR of an mRNA.
42. Huttelmaier S., Zenklusen D., Lederer M., Dictenberg J., Lorenz M., Meng X., Bassell G.J., Condeelis J., and Singer R.H. Spatial regulation of beta-actin translation by Src-dependent phosphorylation of ZBP1. Nature 438 (2005) 512-515
43. Ceci M., Gaviraghi C., Gorrini C., Sala L.A., Offenhauser N., Marchisio P.C., and Biffo S. Release of eIF6 (p27BBP) from the 60S subunit allows 80S ribosome assembly. Nature 426 (2003) 579-584
44. Gandin V., Miluzio A., Barbieri A.M., Beugnet A., Kiyokawa H., Marchisio P.C., and Biffo S. Eukaryotic initiation factor 6 is rate-limiting in translation, growth and transformation. Nature 455 (2008) 684-688
45. Basu U., Si K., Warner J.R., and Maitra U. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae TIF6 gene encoding translation initiation factor 6 is required for 60S ribosomal subunit biogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 21 (2001) 1453-1462
46. Filipowicz W., Bhattacharyya S.N., and Sonenberg N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight?. Nat Rev Genet 9 (2008) 102-114
47. Sivan G., Kedersha N., and Elroy-Stein O. Ribosomal slowdown mediates translational arrest during cellular division. Mol Cell Biol 27 (2007) 6639-6646. This paper reports that during mitosis, translation elongation rates are reduced, probably through phosphorylation of eEF2.
48. Collingridge G.L., Isaac J.T., and Wang Y.T. Receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 5 (2004) 952-962
49. Malenka R.C., and Nicoll R.A. Long-term potentiation-a decade of progress?. Science 285 (1999) 1870-1874
50. Kandel E.R. The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses. Science 294 (2001) 1030-1038
51. Richter J.D., and Klann E. Making synaptic plasticity and memory last: mechanisms of translational regulation. Genes Dev 23 (2009) 1-11
52. Ruegsegger U., Leber J.H., and Walter P. Block of HAC1 mRNA translation by long-range base pairing is released by cytoplasmic splicing upon induction of the unfolded protein response. Cell 107 (2001) 103-114
53. Sidrauski C., and Walter P. The transmembrane kinase Ire1p is a site-specific endonuclease that initiates mRNA splicing in the unfolded protein response. Cell 90 (1997) 1031-1039
54. Aragon T., van Anken E., Pincus D., Serafimova I.M., Korennykh A.V., Rubio C.A., and Walter P. Messenger RNA targeting to endoplasmic reticulum stress signalling sites. Nature 457 (2009) 736-740. This paper shows that translational repression and a 3′UTR targeting element within Hac1 mRNA, a key mediator of the unfolded protein response, is crucial for correct splicing and expression.
55. Cui Y., and Denis C.L. In vivo evidence that defects in the transcriptional elongation factors RPB2, TFIIS, and SPT5 enhance upstream poly(A) site utilization. Mol Cell Biol 23 (2003) 7887-7901
56. Sparks K.A., and Dieckmann C.L. Regulation of poly(A) site choice of several yeast mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 26 (1998) 4676-4687
57. Temperley R.J., Seneca S.H., Tonska K., Bartnik E., Bindoff L.A., Lightowlers R.N., and Chrzanowska-Lightowlers Z.M. Investigation of a pathogenic mtDNA microdeletion reveals a translation-dependent deadenylation decay pathway in human mitochondria. Hum Mol Genet 12 (2003) 2341-2348
58. Keiler K.C., Waller P.R., and Sauer R.T. Role of a peptide tagging system in degradation of proteins synthesized from damaged messenger RNA. Science 271 (1996) 990-993
59. Haebel P.W., Gutmann S., and Ban N. Dial tm for rescue: tmRNA engages ribosomes stalled on defective mRNAs. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14 (2004) 58-65
60. Akimitsu N., Tanaka J., and Pelletier J. Translation of nonSTOP mRNA is repressed post-initiation in mammalian cells. EMBO J 26 (2007) 2327-2338. This paper investigates the mammalian response to aberrant nonSTOP mRNAs and suggests premature ribosome fall off represses translation of these mRNAs.
61. Sandberg R., Neilson J.R., Sarma A., Sharp P.A., and Burge C.B. Proliferating cells express mRNAs with shortened 3′ untranslated regions and fewer microRNA target sites. Science 320 (2008) 1643-1647. This paper shows that proliferating and resting cells express short and long forms, respectively, of many mRNAs depending on poly(A) site selection.
62. Licatalosi D.D., Mele A., Fak J.J., Ule J., Kayikci M., Chi S.W., Clark T.A., Schweitzer A.C., Blume J.E., Wang X., et al. HITS-CLIP yields genome-wide insights into brain alternative RNA processing. Nature 456 (2008) 464-469. This paper uses a technique to map protein-RNA binding sites in vivo on a genome-wide scale to show that Nova regulates alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation in the brain.
63. Wang E.T., Sandberg R., Luo S., Khrebtukova I., Zhang L., Mayr C., Kingsmore S.F., Schroth G.P., and Burge C.B. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 456 (2008) 470-476. This paper uses deep sequencing and bioinformatic analysis to show that mRNA isoforms are more diverse than previously thought, even between cell lines and related tissues.