Meeting your match: How attractiveness similarity affects approach behavior in mixed-sex dyads

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 685-697

  Van Straaten, Ischa ^a   Engels, Rutger C M E ^a   Finkenauer, Catrin ^b   Holland, Rob W ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Interpersonal behavior; Mixed sex dyads; Physical attractiveness; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BEAUTY; BODY IMAGE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; SELF CONCEPT; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; STUDENTS;

EID: 65549138540     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167209332965     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Holland, R.W. (2007). The nonconscious cessation of goal pursuit: When goals and negative affect are coactivated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 165-178.
2. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 830-838.
3. Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K.D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323-370. (Pubitemid 33680154)
4. Baumeister, R.F., & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339-363. (Pubitemid 39665854)
5. Bayes, M.A. (1972). Behavioral cues of interpersonal warmth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 333-339.
6. Berry, D.S., & Miller, K.M. (2001). When boy meets girl: Attractiveness and the five-factor model in opposite-sex interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 62-77. (Pubitemid 33632397)
7. Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G.W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173-189.
8. Berry, D.S., & Miller, K.M. (2001). When boy meets girl: Attractiveness and the five-factor model in opposite-sex interactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 62-77. (Pubitemid 33632397)
9. Bot, S.M., Engels, R.C.M.E., & Knibbe, R.A. (2005). The effects of alcohol expectancies on drinking behaviour in peer groups: Observations in a naturalistic setting. Addiction, 100, 1270-1279. (Pubitemid 41248068)
10. Botwin, M.D., Buss, D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65, 107-136. (Pubitemid 127456232)
11. Brislin, R.W., & Lewis, S.A. (1968). Dating and physical attractiveness: Replication. Psychological Reports, 22, 976.
12. Burley, N. (1983). The meaning of assortative mating. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 191-203.
13. Cavior, N., & Boblett, P.J. (1972). The physical attractiveness of dating vs. married couples. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 7, 175-176.
14. Chambers, V.J., Christiansen, J.R., & Kunz, P.R. (1983). Physiognomic homogamy: A test of physical similarity as a factor in mate selection process. Social Biology, 30, 151-157.
15. Chen, M., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215-224.
16. Clark, C.L., Shaver, P.R., & Abrahams, M.F. (1999). Strategic behaviors in romantic relationship initiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 707-720.
17. Curran, J.P., & Lippold, S. (1975). The effects of physical attraction and attitude similarity on attraction in dating dyads. Journal of Personality, 43, 528-539.
18. Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J.A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1-40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290.
20. Dovidio, J.F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540. (Pubitemid 127129652)
21. Eagly, A.H., Ashmore, R.D., Makhijani, M.G., & Longo, L.C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
22. Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: A meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235.
23. Feng, D., & Baker, L. (1994). Spouse similarity in attitudes, personality, and psychological well-being. Behavioral Genetics, 24, 357-364. (Pubitemid 24317303)
24. Folkes, V.S. (1982). Forming relationships and the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 631-636.
25. Frieze, I.H., Olson, J.E., & Russell, J. (1991). Attractiveness and income for men and women in management. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1039-1057.
26. Gonzaga, G.C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E.A., & Smith, M.D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 247-262. (Pubitemid 33594913)
27. Gonzaga, G.C., Turner, R.A., Keltner, D., Campos, B., & Altemus, M. (2006). Romantic love and sexual desire in close relationships. Emotion, 6, 163-179. (Pubitemid 44060353)
28. Gottman, J.M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.
29. Grammer, K. (1990). Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 209-236.
30. Grammer, K., Honda, M., Juette, A., & Schmitt, A. (1999). Fuzziness of nonverbal courtship communication unblurred by motion energy detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 487-508.
31. Grammer, K., Kruck, K., Juette, A., & Fink, B. (2000). Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: The role of control and choice in selecting partners. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 371-390.
32. Haselton, M.G., & Buss, D.M. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 81-91.
33. Henningsen, D.D. (2004). Flirting with meaning: An examination of miscommunication in flirting interactions. Sex Roles, 50, 481-489. (Pubitemid 39038734)
34. Huston, T.L. (1973). Ambiguity of acceptance, social desirability, and dating choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 32-42.
35. Johnstone, R.A. (1997). The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 51-59. (Pubitemid 27114773)
36. Kalick, S.M., & Hamilton, T.E. (1986). The matching hypothesis reexamined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 673-682.
37. Karremans, J.C., & Verwijmeren, T. (2008). Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: The role of romantic relationship status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 939-950.
38. Keller, M.C., Thiessen, D., & Young, R.K. (1996). Mate assortment in dating and married couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 217-221. (Pubitemid 126167544)
39. Kiesler, S.B., & Baral, R.L. (1970). The search for a romantic partner: The effects of self-esteem and physical attractiveness on romantic behavior. In K. J. Gergen & D. Marlowe (Eds.), Personality and social behavior (pp. 155-378). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40. Langlois, J.H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A.J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.
41. Levesque, M.J., Nave, C.S., & Lowe, C.A. (2006). Toward an understanding of gender differences in inferring sexual interest. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 150-158.
42. Li, N.P., Bailey, J.M., Kenrick, D.T., & Linsenmeier, J.A.W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the trade-offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955.
43. Little, A.C., Burt, D.M., & Perrett, D.I. (2006). Assortative mating for perceived facial personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 973-984.
44. Maner, J.K., Rouby, D.A., & Gonzaga, G.C. (2008). Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: The evolved psychology of relationship maintenance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 343-349.
45. Matthews, L.S., Wickrama, K.A.S., & Conger, R.D. (1996). Predicting marital instability from spouse and observer reports of marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 641-655. (Pubitemid 126333128)
46. McAdams, D.P., Jackson, R.J., & Kirshnit, C. (1984). Looking, laughing, and smiling in dyads as a function of intimacy motivation and reciprocity. Journal of Personality, 52, 261-273.
47. McKillip, J., & Reidel, S.L. (1983). External validity of matching on physical attractiveness for same and opposite sex couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 328-337.
48. Mehrabian, A. (1966). Immediacy: An indicator of attitudes in linguistic communication. Journal of Personality, 34, 26-34.
49. Moore, M.M. (1985). Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: Context and consequences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 237-247.
50. Mottet, T.P., & Richmond, V.P. (1998). An inductive analysis of verbal immediacy: Alternative conceptualization of relational verbal approach/avoidance strategies. Communication Quarterly, 46, 25-40.
51. Murstein, B.I. (1972). Physical attractiveness and marital choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 8-12.
52. Price, R.A., & Vandenberg, S.G. (1979). Matching for physical attractiveness in married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 398-400.
53. Reis, H.T., Clark, M.S., & Holmes, J.G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In A. P. Aron & D. J. Mashek (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199-226.
55. Stroebe, W., Insko, C.A., Thompson, V.D., & Layton, B.D. (1971). Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 79-91.
56. Takeuchi, S.A. (2006). On the matching phenomenon in courtship: A probability matching theory of mate selection. Marriage and Family Review, 40, 25-51.
57. Thiessen, D., & Gregg, B. (1980). Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: An evolutionary perspective. Ethology & Sociobiology, 1, 111-140.
58. Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1, 285-293.
59. Todd, P.M. (1997). Searching for the next best mate. In R. Conte, R. Hegselmann, & P. Terna (Eds.), Simulating social phenomena (pp. 419-436). Berlin: Springer.
60. Todd, P.M., & Miller, G.F. (1999). From pride and prejudice to persuasion: Satisficing in mate search. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 287-308). New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Trivers, R.L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136-179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
62. Vandenberg, S.G. (1972). Assortative mating, or who marries whom ? Behavior Genetics, 2, 127-157.
63. Van Straaten, I., Engels, R.C.M.E., Finkenauer, C., & Holland, R.W. (2008). Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: A semi-naturalistic experiment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 902-911.
64. Van Straaten, I., Holland, R.W., Finkenauer, C., Hollenstein, T., & Engels, R.C.M.E. (in press). Gazing behavior during mixed-sex interactions: Sex and attractiveness effects. Archives of Sexual Behavior. March 5, 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-009-9482-x
65. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508-516.
66. Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2007). Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 79-88. (Pubitemid 46208166)
67. White, G.L. (1980). Physical attractiveness and courtship progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 660-668.