When Boy Meets Girl: Attractiveness and the Five-Factor Model in Opposite-Sex Interactions

Journal of Research in Personality

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 62-77

  Berry, Diane S ^a   Miller, Katherine M ^a  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041833646     PISSN: 00926566     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2304     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berry D. S. Attractiveness, attraction, and sexual selection: Evolutionary perspectives on the form and function of physical attractiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 32:2000;273-342
2. Berry D. S., Hansen J. S. Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 71:1996;796-809
3. Berry D. S., Hansen J. S. Personality, nonverbal behavior, and interaction quality in female dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 26:2000;278-292
4. Berry D. S., Landry J. C. Facial maturity and daily social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 72:1997;570-580
5. Botwin M. D., Buss D. M., Shackelford T. K. Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality. 65:1997;107-136
6. Buss D. M. Sex differences in human mate selection: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brian Sciences. 12:1989;1-49
7. Buss D. M. Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research. 35:1998;19-31
8. Buss D. M., Barnes M. F. Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50:1986;559-570
9. Buss D. M., Schmitt D. P. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review. 100:1993;204-232
10. Costa P. T. Jr., McCrae R. R. Manual for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. 1992;Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa
11. Eagly A. H., Ashmore R. D., Makhijani M. G., Longo L. C. What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin. 110:1991;109-128
12. Eagly A. H., Wood W. The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist. 54:1999;408-423
13. Feingold A. Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59:1990;981-993
14. Gangestad S. W. Sexual selection and physical attractiveness: Implications for mating dynamics. Human Nature. 4:1993;205-235
15. Gangestad S. W., Simpson J. A. The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brian Sciences. 23:2000;573-644
16. Garcia S., Stinson L., Ickes W., Bissonnette V., Briggs S. Shyness and attractiveness in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 61:1991;35-49
17. Howard J. A., Blumstein P., Schwartz P. Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53:1987;194-200
18. Ickes W., Bissonnette V., Garcia S., Stinson L. Implementing and using the dyadic interaction paradigm. Review of Personality and Social Psychology. 11:1990;16-44
19. Ickes W., Stinson L., Bissonnette V., Garcia S. Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 59:1990;720-742
20. Jackson L. A. Physical appearance and gender: Sociobiological and sociocultural perspectives. 1992;SUNY Press, Albany
21. Kalick S., Hamilton T. The matching hypothesis re-examined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51:1986;673-682
22. Langlois J. H. From the eye of the beholder to behavioral reality: Development of social behaviors and social relations as a function of physical attractiveness. Herman C. P., Zanna M. P., Higgins E. T. Physical appearance, stigma, and social behavior: The Ontario Symposium. 1981;23-52 Erlbaum, Hillsdale
23. Langlois J. H., Kalakanis L., Rubinstein A. J., Larson A., Hallam M., Snoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin. 126:2000;390-423
24. Langlois J. H., Roggman L. A., Casey R. J., Rieser-Danner L. A., Jenkins V. Y. Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of a stereotype? Developmental Psychology. 23:1987;363-369
25. Lykken D. T., Tellegen A. Is human mating adventitious or the result of lawful choice? A twin study of mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 65:1993;56-68
26. Reis H. T., Nezlek J., Wheeler L. Physical attractiveness in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 38:1980;604-617
27. Reis H. T., Wheeler L., Spiegel N., Kernis M., Nezlek J., Perri M. Physical attractiveness in social interaction: II. Why does appearance affect social experience? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 343:1982;797-996
28. Slater A., Schulenburg C., Brown E., Badenoch M., Butterworth G., Parsons S., Samuels C. Newborn infants prefer attractive faces. Infant Behavior and Development. 21:1998;345-354
29. Snyder M., Tanke E., Berscheid E. Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35:1977;656-666
30. Watson D., Hubbard B., Wiese D. General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality. 68:2000;413-449