Postsecondary education for individuals with disabilities: Legal and practice considerations

Journal of Disability Policy Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 35-45

  Katsiyannis, Antonis ^a   Zhang, Dalun ^b   Landmark, Leena ^b   Reber, Anne ^b  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodations; Federal policy; Policy analysis; Postsecondary education; Section 504

Indexed keywords

EID: 65149093723     PISSN: 10442073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1044207308324896     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aksamit, D., Morris, M., & Leuenberger, J. (1987). Preparation of student services professionals and faculty for serving learning-disabled college students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 53-59.
2. Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg, 527 U.S. 555 (1999).
3. Alexander v. Choate, 105 S.Ct. 712 (1985).
4. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Retrieved October 16, 2007, from http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/statutes/ofccp/ada. htm
5. Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, 970 F. Supp. 1094 (S.D. N.Y. 1997).
6. Benz, M.R., Lindstrom, L., & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509-529.
7. Bourke, A.B., Strehorn, K.C., & Silver, P. (2000). Faculty members' provision of instructional accommodations to students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 26-32.
8. Bowe, F. (1987). Section 504: 10 years later. American Rehabilitation, 13 (2). 2-3, 23-24.
9. Bowe, F.G. (2000). Universal design in education: Teaching nontraditional students. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
10. Burgstahler, S., Duclos, R., & Turcotte, M. (2000). Preliminary findings: Faculty, teaching assistant, and student perceptions regarding accommodating students with disabilities in postsecondary environments. Seattle: University of Washington, DO-IT. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED456718)
11. Denbo, S.M. (2003). Disability lessons in higher education: Accommodating learning-disabled students and student-athletes under the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. American Business Law Journal, 41, 145-203. (Pubitemid 38727201)
12. Doe v. New York University, 666 F.2d. 761 (1981).
13. Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 29 C.F.R. Section 1630 et seq. (1991). Retrieved August 25, 2008, from http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid= d7f61cf0037df27aea51e436be2d6e3c&rgn=div5&view=text&node=29:4.1.4.1. 20&idno=29
14. Field, S., Sarver, M.D., & Shaw, S.F. (2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339-349. (Pubitemid 37537478)
15. Foley, T., Ruban, L., Scott, S., & McGuire, J. (2000). Infusing universal design into instruction: Meeting diverse learning needs in today's college classrooms. Storrs: University of Connecticut, Center on Postsecondary Education and Disability.
16. Gamble, D. (2000). An analysis of disability support services in higher education. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED445445)
17. Guckenberger v. Boston University, 957 F. Supp. 306 (D. Mass. 1997).
18. Henderson, C. (1995). College freshmen with disabilities: A triennial statistical profile. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://eric.ed.gov/ ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content-storage-01/0000000b/80/23/0b/9b.pdf
19. Horn, L., & Berktold, J. (1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes. Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports. Retrieved September 7, 2006 from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content-storage-01/ 0000000b/80/11/89/8c.pdf
20. Izzo, M.V., Hertzfeld, J.E., & Aaron, J.H. (2001). Raising the bar: Student self-determination + good teaching = success. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 24 (1). 26-36.
21. Johnson, D.R., Stodden, R.A., Emanuel, E.J., Luecking, R., & Mack, M. (2002). Current challenges facing secondary education and transition services: What research tells us. Exceptional Children, 68, 519-531.
22. Karpur, A., Clark, H.B., Caproni, P., & Sterner, H. (2005). Transition to adult roles for students with emotional/behavioral disturbances: A follow-up study of student exiters from Steps-to-Success. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28 (1). 36-46.
23. Knauff, J.J. (2001). Dissing disabilities: A student's duty to mitigate maladies. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, no. 1, 85.
24. Lerner, C.S. (2004). Accommodations for the learning disabled: A level playing field or affirmative action for elites. Vanderbilt Law Review, 57, 1043. (Pubitemid 39288716)
25. Leyser, Y., Vogel, S., Wyland, S., & Brulle, A. (1998). Faculty attitudes and practices regarding students with disabilities: Two decades after implementation of Section 504. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 13 (3). 5-9.
26. Lissner, L.S. (1992). Access to higher education for students with disabilities: What is reasonable? What is fundamental? & Who is qualified ? Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://codi.buffalo.edu/graph-based/.legal. cases/.higher.ed.htm
27. Madaus, J.W., & Shaw, S.F. (2004). Section 504: Differences in the regulations for secondary and postsecondary education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40 (2). 81-88. (Pubitemid 39443223)
28. Marlon v. Western New England College, U.S. App. LEXIS 407 (1st Cir. Mass., Jan. 11, 2005).
29. Matthews, P.R., Anderson, D.W., & Skolnick, B.D. (1987). Faculty attitude toward accommodations for college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3 (1). 46-52.
30. McGuinness v. University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 170 F.3d 974 (10th Cir. 1998).
31. Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2133 (1999).
32. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes. Retrieved March 9, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/ pubs99/1999187.pdf
33. National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 1999-2000. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002168.PDF
34. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 2003-2004, with a special analysis of community college students. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006184b.PDF
35. National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Educational Supports. (2002, July 8). Preparation for and support of youth with disabilities in postsecondary education and employment: Implications for policy, priorities and practice. Proceeding and briefing book for the National Summit on Postsecondary Education for People With Disabilities, Washington, DC. Honolulu, HI: Center on Disability Studies. (Available online: http://www.ncset.Hawaii.edu/summits/ july2002/default.htm )
36. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2007). The documentation disconnect for students with learning disabilities: Improving access to postsecondary disability services. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 265-274.
37. New Jersey Commission on Higher Education. (2007). Findings report: Fall 2006 survey of New Jersey campus programs for students with disabilities. New Jersey Commission on Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED500276)
38. Ouellett, M.L. (2004). Faculty development and universal instructional design. Equity and Excellence in Education, 37, 135-144.
39. Palmer, C., & Roessler, R.T. (2000). Requesting classroom accommodations: Self-advocacy and conflict resolution training for college students with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66 (3). 38-43.
40. Parker, D.R., Shaw, S.F., & McGuire, J.M. (2003). Program evaluation for postsecondary disability services. Journal of Developmental Education, 27 (1). 2-10. (Pubitemid 37110467)
41. Pazer v. New York State Board of Law Examiners, 849 F. Supp. 284 (S.D. N.Y. 1994).
42. Powell v. National Board of Medical Examiners, 364. F.3d 79 (2nd Cir. 2004).
43. Price v. National Board of Medical Examiners, 966 F. Supp. 419 (S.D. W. Va. 1997).
44. Pushkin v. Regents of the University of Colorado, 658 F.2d. 1372 (1981).
45. Ranseen, J.D., & Parks, G.S. (2005). Test accommodations for postsecondary students: The quandary resulting from the ADA's disability definition, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11 (1). 83-108. (Pubitemid 40251472)
46. Rao, S., & Gartin, B.C. (2003). Attitudes of university faculty toward accommodations to students with disabilities. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 25 (2). 47-54.
47. Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (1973).
48. Rose, D. (2001). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16 (2). 66-67.
49. Rothberg v. Law School Admission Council, Inc., 300 F. Supp. 2d 1093 (D. Colo. 2004).
50. Rothstein, L. (2004). Disability law and higher education: A road map for where we've been and where we may be headed. Maryland Law Review, 63, 122.
51. Sarver, M.D. (2000). A study of the relationship between personal and environmental factors bearing on self-determination and the academic success of university students with learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.
52. Scott, S.S., & Gregg, N. (2000). Meeting the evolving education needs of faculty in providing access for college students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 158-167.
53. Scott, S., McGuire, J., & Embry, P. (2002). Universal design for instruction fact sheet. Storrs: University of Connecticut, Center on Postsecondary Education and Disability.
54. Scott, S., McGuire, J., & Shaw, S.F. (2001). Principles of universal design for instruction. Storrs: University of Connecticut, Center on Postsecondary and Disability.
55. Scott, S.S., McGuire, J.M., & Shaw, S.F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 369-379. (Pubitemid 37537481)
56. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 34 C.F.R. Part 104, Subpart E - Postsecondary Education. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/rights/reg/ocr/edlite-34cfr104.html#E
57. Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 442 U.S. 397 (1979).
58. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2139 (1999).
59. Sweener, K., Kundert, D., May, D., & Quinn, K. (2002). Comfort with accommodations at the community college level. Journal of Developmental Education, 25 (3). 12-18, 42.
60. Test, D.W., Aspel, N.P., & Everson, J.M. (2006). Transition methods for youth with disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
61. Thomas, S.B. (2000). College students and disability law. Journal of Special Education, 33, 248-257
62. U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Higher education's obligations under Section 504 and Title II of the ADA: Auxiliary aids and services. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/print/about/offices/list/ ocr/docs/auxaids.html
63. U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Demonstration projects to ensure quality higher education for students with disabilities. Retrieved March 20, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/programs/disabilities/awards.html
64. U.S. Department of Education. (2006). Students with disabilities preparing for postsecondary education: Know your rights and responsibilities. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/ transition.html
65. Vasek, D. (2005). Assessing the knowledge base of faculty at a private, four-year institution. College Student Journal, 39, 307-315.
66. Villarreal, P. (2002). Faculty knowledge of disability law: Implications for higher education practice. Waco, TX: Baylor University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED472463)
67. Welch, P. (Ed.). (1995). Strategies for teaching universal design. Boston: Adaptive Environments.
68. Wilhelm, S. (2003). Accommodating mental disabilities in higher education: A practical guide to ADA requirements. Journal of Law and Education, 32, 217-237. (Pubitemid 36530435)
69. Wilkoff, W.L., & Abed, L.W. (1994). Practicing universal design: An interpretation of the ADA. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
70. Wilson, K., Getzel, E., & Brown, T. (2000). Enhancing the postsecondary campus climate for students with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 14, 37-50. (Pubitemid 30662257)
71. Wynne v. Tufts, 932 F. 2d. 19 (1st Cir. 1991).
72. Yell, M.L., Katsiyannis, A., & Hazelkorn, M. (2007). Reflections on the 25th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Board of Education v. Rowley. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39 (9). 1-12.
73. Zukle v. Regents of the University of California, 166 F. 3d 1041 (9th Cir. 1999).