Genetic diversity of Brazilian pig breeds evidenced by microsatellite markers

Livestock Science

Volumn 123, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 8-15

  Sollero, B P ^a   Paiva, S R ^b   Faria, D A ^b   Guimaraes S E F ^c   Castro, S T R ^b   Egito, A A ^b   Albuquerque, M S M ^b   Piovezan, U ^d   Bertani, G R ^e   Mariante, A da S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRASILIA   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA RECURSOS GENÉTICOS E BIOTECNOLOGIA   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

^d EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^e FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Conservation genetics; Farm animal genetic resources; Molecular markers; Sus scrofa

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 64949130737     PISSN: 18711413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2008.09.025     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Álvarez I., Royo L.J., Fernández I., Gutiérrez J.P., Gómez E., and Goyache F. Genetic relationships and admixture among sheep breeds from northern Spain assessed using microsatellites. J. Anim. Sci. 82 (2004) 2246-2252
2. Amos W., Hoffman A., Frodsham A., Zhang L., Best S., and Hill V.S. Automated binning of microsatellite alleles: problems and solutions. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7 (2006) 10-14
3. Behl R., Sheoran N., Behl J., and Vijh R.K. Genetic analysis of Ankamali pigs of India using microsatellite markers and their comparison with other domesticated Indian pig types. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 123 (2006) 131-135
4. Boyce T.M., Zwick M.E., and Aquadro C.F. Mitochondrial DNA in bark weevils: size, structure, and heteroplasmy. Genetics 123 (1989) 825-836
5. Brondani R.P.V., and Grattapaglia D. Cost-effective method to synthesize a fluorescent internal DNA standard for automated fragment sizing. Biotechniques 31 (2001) 793-800
6. Caballero A., and Toro M.A. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genet. Res. 75 (2000) 331-343
7. Cavalcanti S.S. Suinocultura Dinâmica (2000), Rome: Fep - Mvz Ed, Contagem 494 pp
8. Efron B. Bootstrap confidence intervals for a class of parametric problems. Biometrika 72 (1985) 45-58
9. Excoffier L., Laval G., and Schneider S. Arlequin (Version 3.0). An integrated software package for population genetic data analysis. Computational and Molecular Population Genetics Lab (CMPG) (2005), Institute of Zoology, University of Berne, Switzerland
10. Fabuel E., Barragán C., Silió L., Rodríguez M.C., and Toro M.A. Analysis of genetic diversity and conservation priorities in Iberian pigs based on microsatellite markers. Heredity 93 (2004) 104-113
11. Fan B., Wang Z.-G., Li Y.-J., Zhao X.-L., Liu B., Zhao S.-H., Yu M., Li M.-H., Chen S.-L., Xiong T.-A., and Li K. Genetic variation analysis within and among Chinese indigenous swine populations using microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 33 (2002) 422-427
12. Fang M., Hu X., Jiang T., Braunschweig M., Hu L., Du Z., Feng J., Zhang Q., Wu C., and Li N. The phylogeny of Chinese indigenous pig breeds inferred from microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 36 (2005) 7-13
13. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Secondary Guidelines for Development of National Farm Animal Genetic Resources Management Plans Measurement of Domestic Animal Diversity: Recommended Microsatellite Markers New Microsatellite Marker Sets - Recommendations of Joint ISAG/ FAO Standing Committee. In: Bradley D.G., Fries R., Bumstead N., Nicholas F.W., Cothran O.E.G., and Grawford A.M. (Eds). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2004). http://dad.fao.org/en/refer/library/guidelin/marker.pdf Online. Available in: http://dad.fao.org/en/refer/library/guidelin/marker.pdf. Accessed 15/03/2005.
14. Gonela A. Aplicação de Marcadores Microssatélites de Sus scrofa domestica na Caracterização Genética de Populações de Sus scrofa Sp (Porco-Monteiro) e Tayassu Pecari (Queixada). Ribeirão Preto (2003), Universidade de São Paulo 88 f. Tese (Doutorado)
15. Goudet J. Fstat (Version 2.9.3): A computer program to calculate F-statistics (2002), Institute of Ecology, Biology Building, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
16. Grossi S.F., Lui J.F., Garcia J.E., and Meirelles F.V. Genetic diversity in wild (Sus scrofa scrofa) and domestic (Sus scrofa domestica) pigs and their hybrids based on polymorphism of a fragment of the D-loop region in the mitochondrial DNA. Genet. Mol. Res. 5 (2006) 564-568
17. Guimarães S.E.F. Mapping quantitative trait loci on chromosome 6 (SSC6) in a F2 pig population: I - performance traits. World Conference on Animal Production, 2003, Porto Alegre-RS. Anais do World Conference on Animal Production (2003)
18. Herrera R.C.S.P., Souza R., Herrera H.M., and Mauro R.A. Hábitos alimentares do Porco Monteiro (Sus scrofa) no Pantanal da Nhecolândia, Mato Grosso do Sul. Simpósio sobre recursos naturais e sócio-econômicos do Pantanal, 2., Corumbá. Manejo e conservação. Resumos (1996), Embrapa SPI, Brasília 26
19. Jordana J., Alexandrino P., Beja-Pereira A., Bessa I., Canon J., Carretero Y., Dunner S., Laloe D., Moazami-Goudarz K., Sanchez A., and Ferrand N. Genetic structure of eighteen local south European beef cattle breeds by comparative F-statistics analysis. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 120 (2003) 73-87
20. Kim T.H., Kim K.S., Choi B.H., Yoon D.H., Jang G.W., Lee K.T., Chung H.Y., Lee H.Y., Park H.S., and Lee J.W. Genetic structure of pig breeds from Korea and China using microsatellite loci analysis. J. Anim. Sci. 83 (2005) 2255-2263
21. Laval G., Iannuccellia N., Legault C., Milana D., Groenen M.A.M., Giuffrad E., Anderssond L., Nissene P.H., Jârgensene C.B., Beeckmann P., Geldermann H., Foulley J., Chevaleta C., and Ollivier L. Genetic diversity of eleven European pig breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol. 32 (2000) 187-203
22. Lemus-Flores C., Ulloa-Arvizu R., Ramos-Kuri M., Estrada F.J., and Alonso R. Genetic analysis of Mexican hairless pig populations. J. Anim. Sci. 79 (2001) 3021-3026
23. Li S.-J., Yang S.-H., Zhao S.-H., Fan B., Yu M., Wang H.-S., Li M.-H., Liu B., Xiong T.-A., and Li K. Genetic diversity analyses of 10 indigenous Chinese pig populations based on 20 microsatellites. J. Anim. Sci. 82 (2004) 368-374
24. Mariante A.S., McManus C., and Mendonça J.F.B. Country Report on the State of Animal Genetic Resources - Brazil. 1. ed. vol. 1 (2003), Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília 93 pp
25. Marshall T.C., Slate J., Kruk L., and Pemberton J.M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7 (1998) 639-655
26. Martínez A.M., Acosta J., Vega-Pla J.L., and Delgado J.V. Analysis of the genetic structure of the canary goat populations using microsatellites. Livest. Sci. 102 (2006) 140-145
27. Miller S.A., Dykes D.D., and Polesky H.F.A. Simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucl. Act. Res. 16 (1988) 1215
28. Nei M. Genetic distances between populations. Amer. Nat. 106 (1972) 283-292
29. Nei M., Tajima F., and Tateno Y. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J. Mol. Evol. 19 (1983) 153-170
30. Ollivier L., and Toro M.A. In defense of genetic distances/Genetic distances: a useful tool to be applied with caution. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 125 (2008) 3-4
31. Ota T. Dispan, Genetic distance and phylogenetic analysis (1993), Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, The Pennsylvania State University
32. Park, S.D.E., 2001. Trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection. University Of Dublin. [Ph.D. Thesis (In Prep.)].
33. Parker H.G., Kim L.V., Sutter N.B., Carlson S., Lorentzen T.D., Malek T.B., Johnson G.S., Defrance H.B., Ostrander E.A., and Kruglyak L. Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science 302 (2004) 1160-1164
34. Peter C., Burford M., Perez T., Dalamitra S., and Erhardt G. Genetic diversity and subdivision of 57 European and Middle-Eastern sheep breeds. J. Anim. Genet. 38 (2007) 37-44
35. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., and Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155 (2000) 945-959
36. Raymond M.L., and Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 3.1): an exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49 (1995) 1280-1283
37. Saitou N., and Nei M. The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987) 406-425
38. Sancristobal M., Chevalet C., Haley C.S., Joosten R., Rattink A.P., Harlizius B., Groenen M.A.M., Amigues Y., Boscher M.-Y., Russell G., Law A., Davoli R., Russo V., Désautés C., Alderson L., Fimland E., Bagga M., Delgado J.V., Vega-Pla J.L., Martinez A.M., Ramos M., Glodek P., Meyer J.N., Gandini G.C., Matassino D., Plastow G.S., Siggens K.W., Laval G., Archibald A.L., Milan D., Hammond K., and Cardellino R. Genetic diversity within and between European pig breeds using microsatellite markers. Anim. Genet. 37 (2006) 189-198
39. Silva N.M. O Mouro no Brasil (1987), Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR 24 pp
40. Sneath P.H.A., and Sokal R.R. Numerical Taxonomy; The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification (1973), W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA
41. Tagliaro C.H., Franco M.H.L.P., and Brito B.G. Protein polymorphism and genetic relationships in Moura in relation to other breeds of pigs reared in southern brazil. Rev. Bras. Gen. 18 11 (1995) 69-73
42. Tapio M., Tapio I., Grislis Z., Holm L.E., Jeppsson S., Kantanen J., Miceikiene I., Olsaker I., Viinalass H., and Eythorsdottir E. Native breeds demonstrate high contributions to the molecular variation in northern European sheep. Mol. Ecol. 14 (2005) 3951-3963
43. Vianna A.T. Os Suínos - Criação Prática E Econômica. 2 ed. Série Didática vol. 6 (1956), Serviço de Informação Agrícola, Rio De Janeiro 343 pp
44. Weir B.S., and Cockerham C.C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of the population structure. Evolution 38 (1984) 1358-1370
45. Yang S., Wang Z., Liu B., Zhang G., Zaho S., Yu M., Fan B., Li M., Xiong T., and Li K. Genetic variation and relationships of eighteen Chinese indigenous pig breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol. 35 (2003) 657-671